Department of Medicine Tulane University School of Medicine New Orleans LA.
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana Baton Rouge LA.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Mar 16;10(6):e018986. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018986. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
Background In pursuit of novel mechanisms underlying persistent low medication adherence rates, we assessed contributions of implicit and explicit attitudes, beyond traditional risk factors, in explaining variation in objective and subjective antihypertensive medication adherence. Methods and Results Implicit and explicit attitudes were assessed using the difference scores from the computer-based Single Category Implicit Association Test and the subscales of the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire, respectively. Antihypertensive medication adherence was measured using pharmacy refill proportion of days covered (PDC: mean PDC, low PDC <0.8) and the self-report 4-item Krousel-Wood Medication Adherence Scale (K-Wood-MAS-4: mean K-Wood-MAS-4, low adherence via K-Wood-MAS-4 ≥1). Hierarchical logistic and linear regression models controlled for traditional risk factors including social determinants of health, explicit, and implicit attitudes in a stepwise fashion. Community-dwelling insured participants (n=85: 44.7% female; 20.0% Black; mean age, 62.3 years; 43.5% low PDC, and 31.8% low adherence via K-Wood-MAS-4) had mean (SD) explicit and implicit attitude scores of 7.188 (5.683) and 0.035 (0.334), respectively. Low PDC was inversely associated with more positive explicit (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.98; =0.022) and implicit (aOR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02-0.80; =0.029) attitudes, which accounted for an additional 8.6% (=0.016) and 6.5% (=0.029) of variation in low PDC, respectively. Lower mean K-Wood-MAS-4 scores (better adherence) were associated only with more positive explicit attitudes (adjusted β, -0.04; 95% CI, -0.07 to -0.01; =0.026); explicit attitudes explained an additional 5.6% (=0.023) of K-Wood-MAS-4 variance. Conclusions Implicit and explicit attitudes explained significantly more variation in medication adherence beyond traditional risk factors, including social determinants of health, and should be explored as potential mechanisms underlying adherence behavior.
为了探索导致持续低药物依从性的新机制,我们评估了内隐和外显态度对解释客观和主观降压药物依从性差异的作用,这些作用超出了传统的风险因素。
使用基于计算机的单类别内隐联想测验的差值分数和药物信念问卷的分量表分别评估内隐和外显态度。使用药房配药比例覆盖天数(PDC:平均 PDC,低 PDC<0.8)和自我报告的 4 项 Krousel-Wood 药物依从性量表(K-Wood-MAS-4:平均 K-Wood-MAS-4,通过 K-Wood-MAS-4≥1 表示低依从性)来测量降压药物的依从性。在逐步的方式中,使用传统的风险因素(包括社会决定因素)、外显和内隐态度对社区居住的有保险参与者(n=85:44.7%女性;20.0%黑人;平均年龄 62.3 岁;43.5%低 PDC,31.8%通过 K-Wood-MAS-4 表示低依从性)进行分层逻辑回归和线性回归模型。社区居住的有保险参与者(n=85:44.7%女性;20.0%黑人;平均年龄 62.3 岁;43.5%低 PDC,31.8%通过 K-Wood-MAS-4 表示低依从性)具有平均(SD)外显和内隐态度得分分别为 7.188(5.683)和 0.035(0.334)。低 PDC 与更积极的外显态度呈负相关(调整后的比值比 [aOR],0.87;95%CI,0.78-0.98;=0.022)和内隐态度(aOR,0.12;95%CI,0.02-0.80;=0.029),这分别解释了低 PDC 变化的额外 8.6%(=0.016)和 6.5%(=0.029)。较低的平均 K-Wood-MAS-4 评分(更好的依从性)仅与更积极的外显态度相关(调整后的 β,-0.04;95%CI,-0.07 至 -0.01;=0.026);外显态度解释了 K-Wood-MAS-4 方差的额外 5.6%(=0.023)。
内隐和外显态度解释了药物依从性的更多变化,超出了传统的风险因素,包括社会决定因素,应作为依从行为的潜在机制进行探索。