• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗高血压治疗的依从性及其决定因素:一项系统评价。

Adherence to Antihypertensive Therapy and Its Determinants: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Ferreira Pedro D, Simoes Jose A, Velho Denise C

机构信息

Family Medicine, ULS Santo António, USF Santa Maria, Porto, PRT.

Department of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, PRT.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 May 2;16(5):e59532. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59532. eCollection 2024 May.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.59532
PMID:38826951
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11144025/
Abstract

Hypertension is a globally prevalent condition, and low adherence to antihypertensive therapy is considered one of the main causes of poor blood pressure (BP) control. Non-adherence to antihypertensive treatment is a complex issue that can arise from various factors; however, gaining an understanding of this provides key targets for intervention strategies. This study aimed to provide an overview of the current status and recent developments regarding our understanding of the determinants of patients' adherence to antihypertensives. A systematic review was performed using the electronic databases MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), and "Índex das Revistas Médicas Portuguesas", which included studies published between 2017 and 2021 following the PICOS model: (P) Adult patients with the diagnosis of primary hypertension, using at least one antihypertensive agent; (I) all interventions on both pharmacological and non-pharmacological level; (C) patient's adherence against their non-adherence; (O) changes in adherence to the therapeutic plan; and (S) any study design (except review articles) written in English, French, Spanish or Portuguese. Articles were reviewed by two researchers and their quality was assessed. Subsequently, determinants were classified according to their consistent or inconsistent association with adherence or non-adherence. Only 45 of the 635 reports identified met the inclusion criteria. Adherence was consistently associated with patient satisfaction with communication, patient-provider relationship, their treatment, and use of eHealth and mHealth strategies; a patient's mental and physical health, including depression, cognitive impairment, frailty, and disability, previous hospitalization, occurrence of vital events; drug treatment type and appearance; and unwillingness due to health literacy, self-efficacy, and both implicit and explicit attitudes towards treatment. There were discrepancies regarding the association of other factors to adherence, but these inconsistent factors should also be taken into account. In conclusion, the barriers to adherence are varied and often interconnected between socioeconomic, patient, therapy, condition, and healthcare system levels. Healthcare teams should invest in studying patients' non-adherence motives and tailoring interventions to individual levels, by using a multifaceted approach to assess adherence. Further research is needed to analyze the impact of implicit attitudes, the use of new technological approaches, and the influence of factors that are inconsistently associated with non-adherence, to understand their potential in implementing adherence strategies.

摘要

高血压是一种全球普遍存在的病症,对抗高血压治疗的低依从性被认为是血压控制不佳的主要原因之一。不坚持抗高血压治疗是一个复杂的问题,可能由多种因素引起;然而,了解这一点为干预策略提供了关键目标。本研究旨在概述目前关于患者对抗高血压药物依从性决定因素的认识现状和最新进展。使用电子数据库MEDLINE/PubMed、科学引文索引、科学电子图书馆在线(SciELO)和《葡萄牙医学杂志索引》进行了系统综述,其中包括2017年至2021年期间发表的遵循PICOS模型的研究:(P)诊断为原发性高血压的成年患者,使用至少一种抗高血压药物;(I)药理学和非药理学层面的所有干预措施;(C)患者的依从性与不依从性;(O)治疗计划依从性的变化;(S)以英语、法语、西班牙语或葡萄牙语撰写的任何研究设计(综述文章除外)。文章由两名研究人员进行评审并评估其质量。随后,根据与依从性或不依从性的一致或不一致关联对决定因素进行分类。在635份识别出的报告中,只有45份符合纳入标准。依从性始终与患者对沟通、医患关系、治疗以及电子健康和移动健康策略使用的满意度相关;患者的身心健康,包括抑郁、认知障碍、虚弱和残疾、既往住院史、重大事件的发生;药物治疗类型和外观;以及由于健康素养、自我效能感以及对治疗的隐性和显性态度而导致的不愿意。其他因素与依从性的关联存在差异,但这些不一致的因素也应予以考虑。总之,依从性的障碍多种多样,并且在社会经济、患者、治疗、病情和医疗保健系统层面之间往往相互关联。医疗团队应通过采用多方面方法评估依从性,投入研究患者不依从的动机并针对个体层面量身定制干预措施。需要进一步研究以分析隐性态度的影响、新技术方法的使用以及与不依从性不一致相关因素的影响,以了解它们在实施依从性策略中的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/470d/11144025/d8c77bbb0686/cureus-0016-00000059532-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/470d/11144025/d8c77bbb0686/cureus-0016-00000059532-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/470d/11144025/d8c77bbb0686/cureus-0016-00000059532-i01.jpg

相似文献

1
Adherence to Antihypertensive Therapy and Its Determinants: A Systematic Review.抗高血压治疗的依从性及其决定因素:一项系统评价。
Cureus. 2024 May 2;16(5):e59532. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59532. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Effect of Interactive eHealth Interventions on Improving Medication Adherence in Adults With Long-Term Medication: Systematic Review.互动式电子健康干预对改善长期用药成人用药依从性的效果:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 8;23(1):e18901. doi: 10.2196/18901.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
6
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
7
The Effectiveness of Self-Management of Hypertension in Adults Using Mobile Health: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.使用移动健康技术管理成年人高血压的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Mar 27;8(3):e17776. doi: 10.2196/17776.
8
Factors associated with antihypertensive medication non-adherence: a systematic review.与抗高血压药物治疗依从性不佳相关的因素:一项系统综述
J Hum Hypertens. 2017 Nov;31(11):687-694. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2017.48. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
9
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
[Frailty and pharmacotherapy].[衰弱与药物治疗]
Inn Med (Heidelb). 2025 Sep 3. doi: 10.1007/s00108-025-01980-8.
2
Psychosocial Determinants of Non-adherence to Antihypertensive Therapy: A Cross-Sectional Study in Pakistani Tertiary Care Hospitals.高血压治疗依从性不佳的社会心理决定因素:巴基斯坦三级护理医院的横断面研究
Cureus. 2025 Feb 28;17(2):e79862. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79862. eCollection 2025 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
The use of an electronic medication organizer device with alarm to improve medication adherence of older adults with hypertension.使用带报警功能的电子药物管理设备来提高老年高血压患者的药物依从性。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2021 Sep 24;19:eAO6011. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2021AO6011. eCollection 2021.
2
Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants.全球高血压患病率趋势及 1990 至 2019 年治疗和控制进展情况:1040 万参与者、1201 项人群代表性研究的汇总分析
Lancet. 2021 Sep 11;398(10304):957-980. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01330-1. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
3
Factors associated to the adherence to the non-pharmachological treatment of hypertension in primary health care.
与初级卫生保健中高血压非药物治疗依从性相关的因素。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2021 Aug 18;74(suppl 6):e20200173. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0173. eCollection 2021.
4
Association Between Patient-Clinician Relationships and Adherence to Antihypertensive Medications Among Black Adults: An Observational Study Design.患者-临床医生关系与黑人成年人抗高血压药物依从性之间的关联:一项观察性研究设计。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jul 20;10(14):e019943. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019943. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
5
The association between social support and medication adherence in patients with hypertension: A systematic review.高血压患者社会支持与药物治疗依从性之间的关联:一项系统综述。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2021 Apr-Jun;19(2):2300. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2021.2.2300. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
6
Real-world Antihypertensive Treatment Patterns, Treatment Adherence, and Blood Pressure Control in the Elderly: An Italian Awareness-raising Campaign on Hypertension by Senior Italia FederAnziani, the Italian Society of Hypertension and the Italian Federation of General Practitioners.真实世界的降压治疗模式、治疗依从性和老年人血压控制:由 Senior Italia FederAnziani、意大利高血压学会和意大利全科医生联合会发起的一项关于高血压的意大利提高认识运动。
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2021 Sep;28(5):457-466. doi: 10.1007/s40292-021-00465-7. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
7
Effect of number of medications and complexity of regimens on medication adherence and blood pressure management in hospitalized patients with hypertension.住院高血压患者的药物数量和治疗方案的复杂性对药物依从性和血压管理的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 10;16(6):e0252944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252944. eCollection 2021.
8
Global epidemiology, health burden and effective interventions for elevated blood pressure and hypertension.全球高血压流行病学、健康负担及有效干预措施
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021 Nov;18(11):785-802. doi: 10.1038/s41569-021-00559-8. Epub 2021 May 28.
9
Adherence to Treatment by Initial Antihypertensive Mono and Combination Therapies.初始抗高血压单药和联合治疗的治疗依从性。
Am J Hypertens. 2021 Oct 27;34(10):1083-1091. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpab083.
10
Nonadherence to antihypertensive medications amongst patients with uncontrolled hypertension: A retrospective study.未经控制的高血压患者对抗高血压药物的不依从:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Apr 9;100(14):e24654. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024654.