Suppr超能文献

开发并评估一种自我报告工具,以预测高血压未控制的老年患者中低药物续配依从性。

Development and evaluation of a self-report tool to predict low pharmacy refill adherence in elderly patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

机构信息

Center for Health Research, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, Louisiana 70121, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 2013 Aug;33(8):798-811. doi: 10.1002/phar.1275. Epub 2013 May 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop and evaluate a short self-report tool to predict low pharmacy refill adherence in older patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis of survey and administrative data from the Cohort Study of Medication Adherence Among Older Adults (CoSMO).

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 394 adults with uncontrolled blood pressure; mean ± SD age was 76.6 ± 5.6 years, 33.0% were black, 66.0% were women, and 23.4% had a low medication possession ratio (MPR).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We considered 164 self-reported candidate items for development of a prediction rule for low (less than 0.8) versus high (0.8 or more) MPR from pharmacy refill data. Risk prediction models were evaluated by using best subsets analyses, and the final model was chosen based on clinical relevance and model parsimony. Bootstrap simulations assessed internal validity. The performance of the final four-item model was compared to the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) and the nine-item Hill-Bone Compliance Scale. The four-item self-report tool for predicting pharmacy refill adherence showed moderate discrimination (C statistic 0.704, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.683-0.714) and good model fit (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ² = 1.238, p=0.743). Sensitivity and specificity were 67.4% and 67.8%, respectively. The concordance (C) statistics for MMAS-8 and the Hill-Bone Compliance Scale were lower at 0.665 (95% CI 0.632-0.683) and 0.660 (95% CI 0.622-0.674), respectively.

CONCLUSION

A four-item self-report tool moderately discriminated low from high pharmacy refill adherers, and its test performance was comparable with existing eight- and nine-item adherence scales. Parsimonious self-report tools predicting low pharmacy refill in patients with uncontrolled blood pressure could facilitate hypertension management in the elderly.

摘要

目的

开发并评估一种简短的自我报告工具,以预测血压控制不佳的老年患者的低药房 refill 依从性。

设计

对老年人药物依从性队列研究(CoSMO)的调查和行政数据进行横断面分析。

参与者

共 394 名血压控制不佳的成年人;平均年龄 ± 标准差为 76.6 ± 5.6 岁,33.0%为黑人,66.0%为女性,23.4%的药物占有比(MPR)较低。

测量和主要结果

我们考虑了 164 项自我报告的候选项目,以从药房 refill 数据中开发用于预测低(小于 0.8)与高(0.8 或更高)MPR 的规则。使用最佳子集分析评估风险预测模型,并根据临床相关性和模型简约性选择最终模型。 bootstrap 模拟评估内部有效性。将最终的四项自我报告工具与八项 Morisky 药物依从性量表(MMAS-8)和九项 Hill-Bone 依从性量表进行比较。用于预测药房 refill 依从性的四项自我报告工具显示出中等的区分度(C 统计量 0.704,95%置信区间 [CI],0.683-0.714)和良好的模型拟合度(Hosmer-Lemeshow χ²=1.238,p=0.743)。敏感性和特异性分别为 67.4%和 67.8%。MMAS-8 和 Hill-Bone 依从性量表的一致性(C)统计量分别为 0.665(95% CI 0.632-0.683)和 0.660(95% CI 0.622-0.674),较低。

结论

四项自我报告工具适度区分低 refill 与高 refill 依从者,其测试性能与现有的八项和九项依从性量表相当。用于预测血压控制不佳的老年患者低药房 refill 的简约自我报告工具可以促进老年人的高血压管理。

相似文献

4
Risk Factors for Low Pharmacy Refill Adherence Among Older Hypertensive Men and Women by Race.
Am J Med Sci. 2018 Nov;356(5):464-475. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
10
Exploring the Agreement Between Self-Reported Medication Adherence and Pharmacy Refill-Based Measures in Patients with Kidney Disease.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Dec 30;16:3465-3477. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S388060. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Medication adherence scales in non-communicable diseases: A scoping review of design gaps, constructs and validation processes.
PLoS One. 2025 May 14;20(5):e0321423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321423. eCollection 2025.
2
4
A Systematic Review of the Hill-Bone Compliance to Blood Pressure Therapy Scale.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Sep 28;17:2401-2420. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S412198. eCollection 2023.
6
The Impact of Adherence to Disease-Modifying Therapies on Functional Outcomes in Veterans with Multiple Sclerosis.
J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2021 Jul 6;13:11795735211028769. doi: 10.1177/11795735211028769. eCollection 2021.
7
Medication Adherence: Expanding the Conceptual Framework.
Am J Hypertens. 2021 Sep 22;34(9):895-909. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpab046.
9
Multifaceted strategies to improve blood pressure control in a primary care clinic: A quality improvement project.
Int J Cardiol Hypertens. 2020 Oct 27;7:100060. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchy.2020.100060. eCollection 2020 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Heart disease and stroke statistics--2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association.
Circulation. 2012 Jan 3;125(1):e2-e220. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823ac046. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
2
Health-related quality of life and antihypertensive medication adherence among older adults.
Age Ageing. 2010 Jul;39(4):481-7. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afq040. Epub 2010 May 31.
3
US trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, 1988-2008.
JAMA. 2010 May 26;303(20):2043-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.650.
4
Antihypertensive medication adherence, ambulatory visits, and risk of stroke and death.
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jun;25(6):495-503. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1240-1. Epub 2010 Feb 18.
6
Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics are not clinically useful predictors of refill adherence in patients with hypertension.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 Sep;2(5):451-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.841635. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
7
Comparison of two self-rating instruments for medication adherence assessment in hypertension revealed insufficient psychometric properties.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Mar;63(3):299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.011. Epub 2009 Sep 17.
8
Medication adherence: its importance in cardiovascular outcomes.
Circulation. 2009 Jun 16;119(23):3028-35. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.768986.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验