Suppr超能文献

测量技术会影响气流受限患者中转移因子(TICO)对沙丁胺醇的反应。

Measurement technique influences the response of transfer factor (TICO) to salbutamol in patients with airflow limitation.

作者信息

Chinn D J, Askew J, Rowley L, Cotes J E

机构信息

Department of Occupational Health and Hygiene, Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 1988 Jan;1(1):15-21.

PMID:3366232
Abstract

Single-breath transfer factor obtained using a multibreath estimate of alveolar volume (TI) was measured before and after salbutamol in twenty patients with reversible airflow limitation. The effective breathholding time was calculated by four methods due respectively to Ogilvie and colleagues as modified by the American Thoracic Society (ATS), ATS Epidemiological Standardization Project (ESP), Jones and Meade in which allowance was made for the time of sample collection and a simplified method in which the allowance for sampling was in terms of volume, not time. Two patients could perform the test procedure only after salbutamol. Amongst the remainder the transfer factor calculated using a single-breath estimate of alveolar volume (TI') was on average 12% less than TI. Carbon monoxide transfer coefficient (KCO), TI and TI' were highest by the ESP method and lowest by the Ogilvie method. Inhalation of salbutamol (200 gamma) did not affect TI' by any method or TI and KCO by the Jones and Meade method but results by the other methods were reduced; in the case of the modified Ogilvie method the reduction was 3.9%. This error was due to overestimation of effective breathholding time by neglecting the reduction of 39% which occurred in the time of sample collection. The time of inspiration was unchanged whilst the time of deadspace washout was reduced by 16%. After bronchodilatation the absence of a change in TI' was due to the overestimation of effective breathholding time being offset by an increase in the proportion of alveolar volume measured by the single-breath procedure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

对20例可逆性气流受限患者,在使用沙丁胺醇前后,测量采用肺泡容积多呼吸估计值(TI)得到的单次呼吸转移因子。有效屏气时间通过四种方法计算,分别是经美国胸科学会(ATS)修改的奥格尔维及其同事的方法、ATS流行病学标准化项目(ESP)方法、琼斯和米德的方法(该方法考虑了样本采集时间)以及一种简化方法(该方法根据容积而非时间考虑采样因素)。两名患者仅在使用沙丁胺醇后才能进行测试程序。在其余患者中,采用肺泡容积单次呼吸估计值(TI')计算的转移因子平均比TI低12%。一氧化碳转移系数(KCO)、TI和TI'在ESP方法下最高,在奥格尔维方法下最低。吸入沙丁胺醇(200微克)对任何方法计算的TI'以及琼斯和米德方法计算的TI和KCO均无影响,但其他方法的结果降低;在改良奥格尔维方法中,降低了3.9%。该误差是由于忽略了样本采集时间减少39%导致有效屏气时间高估。吸气时间未变,而死腔冲洗时间减少了16%。支气管扩张后,TI'无变化是由于有效屏气时间的高估被单次呼吸程序测量的肺泡容积比例增加所抵消。(摘要截短至250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验