• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国癌症中心的心理健康与药物依赖服务

Mental Health and Chemical Dependency Services at US Cancer Centers.

作者信息

Niazi Shehzad K, Spaulding Aaron, Brennan Emily, Meier Sarah K, Crook Julia E, Cornell Lauren F, Ailawadhi Sikander, Clark Matthew M, Rummans Teresa A

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry & Psychology.

Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, and.

出版信息

J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Mar 4;19(7):829-838. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7657.

DOI:10.6004/jnccn.2020.7657
PMID:33662936
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is standard of care and an accreditation requirement to screen for and address distress and psychosocial needs in patients with cancer. This study assessed the availability of mental health (MH) and chemical dependency (CD) services at US cancer centers.

METHODS

The 2017-2018 American Hospital Association (AHA) survey, Area Health Resource File, and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hospital Compare databases were used to assess availability of services and associations with hospital-level and health services area (HSA)-level characteristics.

RESULTS

Of 1,144 cancer centers surveyed, 85.4% offered MH services and 45.5% offered CD services; only 44.1% provided both. Factors associated with increased adjusted odds of offering MH services were teaching status (odds ratio [OR], 1.76; 95% CI, 1.18-2.62), being a member of a hospital system (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.31-3.07), and having more beds (OR, 1.04 per 10-bed increase; 95% CI, 1.02-1.05). Higher population estimate (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99), higher percentage uninsured (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.86-0.95), and higher Mental Health Professional Shortage Area level in the HSA (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-1.00) were associated with decreased odds of offering MH services. Government-run (OR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.30-6.22) and nonprofit centers (OR, 3.48; 95% CI, 1.78-6.79) showed increased odds of offering CD services compared with for-profit centers. Those that were members of hospital systems (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.14-2.29) and had more beds (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03) also showed increased odds of offering these services. A higher percentage of uninsured patients in the HSA (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.88-0.97) was associated with decreased odds of offering CD services.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' ability to pay, membership in a hospital system, and organization size may be drivers of decisions to co-locate services within cancer centers. Larger organizations may be better able to financially support offering these services despite poor reimbursement rates. Innovations in specialty payment models highlight opportunities to drive transformation in delivering MH and CD services for high-need patients with cancer.

摘要

背景

筛查并关注癌症患者的痛苦及心理社会需求是护理标准及认证要求。本研究评估了美国癌症中心心理健康(MH)和药物依赖(CD)服务的可及性。

方法

使用2017 - 2018年美国医院协会(AHA)调查、区域卫生资源文件以及医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心医院比较数据库来评估服务的可及性以及与医院层面和卫生服务区域(HSA)层面特征的关联。

结果

在接受调查的1144家癌症中心中,85.4%提供MH服务,45.5%提供CD服务;只有44.1%同时提供这两种服务。与提供MH服务的调整后几率增加相关的因素包括教学地位(优势比[OR],1.76;95%置信区间[CI],1.18 - 2.62)、作为医院系统的成员(OR,2.00;95% CI,1.31 - 3.07)以及拥有更多床位(每增加10张床位OR为1.04;95% CI,1.02 - 1.05)。较高的人口估计数(OR,0.98;95% CI,0.97 - 0.99)、较高的未参保百分比(OR,0.90;95% CI,0.86 - 0.95)以及HSA中较高的心理健康专业人员短缺区域水平(OR,0.99;95% CI,0.98 - 1.00)与提供MH服务的几率降低相关。与营利性中心相比,政府运营的中心(OR,2.85;95% CI,1.30 - 6.22)和非营利性中心(OR,3.48;95% CI,1.78 - 6.79)提供CD服务的几率增加。那些是医院系统成员(OR,1.61;95% CI,1.14 - 2.29)且床位更多(OR,1.02;95% CI,1.01 - 1.03)的中心提供这些服务的几率也增加。HSA中未参保患者的较高百分比(OR,0.92;95% CI,0.88 - 0.97)与提供CD服务的几率降低相关。

结论

患者的支付能力、医院系统成员身份和机构规模可能是癌症中心内服务并置决策的驱动因素。尽管报销率较低,但较大的机构可能更有能力在经济上支持提供这些服务。专科支付模式的创新凸显了推动为高需求癌症患者提供MH和CD服务变革的机会。

相似文献

1
Mental Health and Chemical Dependency Services at US Cancer Centers.美国癌症中心的心理健康与药物依赖服务
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Mar 4;19(7):829-838. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7657.
2
Mental health and chemical dependency services at US transplant centers.美国移植中心的心理健康和药物依赖服务。
Am J Transplant. 2020 Apr;20(4):1152-1161. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15659. Epub 2019 Dec 1.
3
Hospital Characteristics Associated With Penalties in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program.与医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心医院获得性条件减少计划相关的医院特征。
JAMA. 2015 Jul 28;314(4):375-83. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.8609.
4
Availability of Trauma-Specific Services in US Substance Use Disorder and Other Mental Health Treatment Facilities: 2015-2019.美国物质使用障碍和其他心理健康治疗机构中创伤专科服务的可及性:2015-2019 年。
Psychiatr Q. 2022 Sep;93(3):703-715. doi: 10.1007/s11126-022-09987-2. Epub 2022 May 25.
5
Hospital-Level Changes in Adult ICU Bed Supply in the United States.美国成人重症监护病房床位供应的医院层面变化
Crit Care Med. 2017 Jan;45(1):e67-e76. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002051.
6
Provision of chaplaincy services in U.S. hospitals: A strategic conformity perspective.美国医院牧师服务的提供:战略一致性视角。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2023;48(4):342-351. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000382. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
7
Comparing the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program and the Accreditation of Cancer Program: A Cross-sectional Study.比较医院获得性疾病减少计划与癌症计划认证:一项横断面研究。
Inquiry. 2018 Jan-Dec;55:46958018770294. doi: 10.1177/0046958018770294.
8
Chest pain center accreditation is associated with better performance of centers for Medicare and Medicaid services core measures for acute myocardial infarction.胸痛中心认证与急性心肌梗死的医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心核心指标的更好表现相关。
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Jul 15;102(2):120-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.03.028. Epub 2008 May 14.
9
The association between for-profit hospital ownership and increased Medicare spending.营利性医院所有权与医疗保险支出增加之间的关联。
N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 5;341(6):420-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199908053410606.
10
Medicare Program; hospital inpatient prospective payment systems for acute care hospitals and the long-term care hospital prospective payment system changes and FY2011 rates; provider agreements and supplier approvals; and hospital conditions of participation for rehabilitation and respiratory care services; Medicaid program: accreditation for providers of inpatient psychiatric services. Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.医疗保险计划;急性护理医院的住院患者前瞻性支付系统以及长期护理医院前瞻性支付系统的变更和2011财年费率;提供者协议和供应商批准;以及康复和呼吸护理服务的医院参与条件;医疗补助计划:住院精神科服务提供者的认证。最终规则和有意见征求期的暂行最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2010 Aug 16;75(157):50041-681.

引用本文的文献

1
ICD support groups: Are they still relevant now?国际疾病分类支持小组:它们现在仍然相关吗?
Heart Rhythm O2. 2025 Apr 3;6(6):874-879. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2025.03.021. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Acceptance and commitment therapy in metastatic gastrointestinal cancer: patient and caregiver qualitative study.转移性胃肠道癌的接纳与承诺疗法:患者及照护者的质性研究
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2025 May 9. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2025-005548.
3
How Racialized Approaches to Opioid Use Disorder and Opioid Misuse Management Hamper Pharmacoequity for Cancer Pain.
针对阿片类药物使用障碍和阿片类药物滥用管理的种族化方法如何阻碍癌症疼痛的药物公平性。
J Clin Oncol. 2025 Jan;43(1):10-14. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00705. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
4
Creating a Palliative Care Clinic for Patients with Cancer Pain and Substance Use Disorder.为癌症疼痛和物质使用障碍患者创建姑息治疗诊所。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Aug;68(2):e138-e145. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.04.011. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
5
Should We Use COMM (Current Opioid Misuse Measure) to Screen for Opioid Abuse in Patients With Cancer Pain?我们是否应该使用 COMM(当前阿片类药物滥用测量)来筛查癌症疼痛患者的阿片类药物滥用?
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023 Nov;21(11):1132-1140.e3. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7054.