1974 School of Historical and Philosophical Inquiry, University of Queensland, QLD, Australia.
J Hum Lact. 2021 May;37(2):348-356. doi: 10.1177/0890334421994776. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
Wet-nurses themselves rarely left written accounts. In this article, I have reconstructed their experiences and work situations breastfeeding other women's infants in colonial Australia through examining available sources concerning their employment situations and the fate of their infants when they were boarded out, as they commonly were. The employment of wet-nurses by royal households or prominent families has long been the topic of historical accounts, whereas the situation of the more numerous wet-nurses further down the social spectrum has received disproportionately little examination. In this article, I do not discuss informal, altruistic wet nursing by family or neighbors but, rather, the situation of those women for whom it was an occupation, by its very nature short term. Primary material sighted for this study included a considerable number of advertisements for positions placed by employers, their intermediaries (e.g., family physicians) and wet-nurses themselves, and newspaper reports when the wet-nurse's children came to the attention of the courts. Death for boarded-out infants who succumbed to inappropriate feeding and substandard care was typically ascribed to "natural causes."
奶妈自己很少留下书面记录。在本文中,我通过考察有关她们就业情况的现有资料以及她们所哺乳的婴儿被送养时(通常是这样)的命运,重构了她们在殖民时期澳大利亚哺乳其他妇女婴儿的经历和工作情况。皇室家庭或知名家庭雇佣奶妈一直是历史记载的主题,而社会地位较低的更多数目的奶妈则受到不成比例的较少关注。在本文中,我不讨论家庭或邻居之间非正式的、利他的母乳喂养,而是讨论那些将其作为职业的女性的情况,从本质上讲,这种情况是短期的。这项研究中看到的主要材料包括雇主、他们的中间人(例如家庭医生)和奶妈自己发布的大量职位广告,以及当奶妈自己的孩子引起法庭注意时的报纸报道。对于因不当喂养和不合格护理而夭折的送养婴儿,通常归因于“自然原因”。