Ulupınar Süleyman, Özbay Serhat
Ermenek District National Education Directorate, Turkiye Cumhuriyeti Milli Egitim Bakanligi, Karaman, Turkey.
Faculty of Sport Sciences, Erzurum Technical University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Res Sports Med. 2022 May-Jun;30(3):244-255. doi: 10.1080/15438627.2021.1895784. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
This study aimed to investigate the energy pathway contributions and physiological and performance responses between a 10 × 6-second intermittent sprint test (IST) and a 60-second single maximal test (SMT). Seventeen highly trained male Greco-Roman wrestlers participated in this study. Participants completed the 60-second upper-body Wingate tests, both intermittent and single forms. The contributions of the oxidative, glycolytic, and ATP-PCr pathways were estimated using mathematical methods based on lactate values and oxygen consumption kinetics of rest, exercise, and recovery phases. The main findings indicated that total energy expenditure (TEE) and the contribution of oxidative, glycolytic, and ATP-PCr pathways were 514 kJ, 45%, 11%, and 44% for IST (overall: sprints + rest intervals); 333 kJ, 14%, 17%, and 69% for IST (sprints only); and 159 kJ, 31%, 38%, and 31% for SMT, respectively. TEE and ATP-PCR pathway contributions were higher in the IST (both overall and sprint only), whereas glycolytic pathway contribution and delta lactate were higher in the SMT. Absolute oxidative contribution was similar, but relative oxidative contribution was higher in the SMT. Additionally, mean power was higher in the IST than SMT, whereas peak power, peak and mean heart rate, and ratings of perceived exertion were similar.
本研究旨在调查10×6秒间歇性冲刺测试(IST)和60秒单次最大测试(SMT)之间的能量途径贡献以及生理和运动表现反应。17名训练有素的男子古典式摔跤运动员参与了本研究。参与者完成了60秒的上肢温盖特测试,包括间歇性和单次形式。基于休息、运动和恢复阶段的乳酸值和耗氧动力学,使用数学方法估算氧化、糖酵解和ATP-PCr途径的贡献。主要研究结果表明,IST(总体:冲刺+休息间隔)的总能量消耗(TEE)以及氧化、糖酵解和ATP-PCr途径的贡献分别为514千焦、45%、11%和44%;IST(仅冲刺)的分别为333千焦、14%、17%和69%;SMT的分别为159千焦、31%、38%和31%。IST(总体和仅冲刺)的TEE和ATP-PCR途径贡献更高,而SMT的糖酵解途径贡献和乳酸变化更高。绝对氧化贡献相似,但SMT的相对氧化贡献更高。此外,IST的平均功率高于SMT,而峰值功率、峰值和平均心率以及主观用力程度评分相似。