Barsties V Latoszek Ben, Göllner Margrit, Mathmann Philipp, Neumann Katrin
Speech-Language Pathology, SRH University of Applied Health Sciences, Düsseldorf, Germany; Department of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology, University Hospital Münster, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Department of Speech-Language Pathology, Dr. Becker Rhein-Sieg-Klinik, Nümbrecht, Germany.
J Voice. 2023 May;37(3):469.e11-469.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.01.024. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
The Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI), a 19-item psychometric self-report questionnaire, enables individuals with vocal fatigue (VF) to be identified and their complaints to be characterized. The purpose of this study was to improve the German-language version (VFI-G) and to evaluate further vocal fatigue-related characteristics of dysphonic and control populations.
The VFI-G was restructured by replacing the three factors that structured the original: (1) tiredness of voice and voice avoidance; (2) physical discomfort; and (3) improvement of symptoms with rest, with two clusters developed on the basis of the results of a factor analysis by Nanjundeswaran et al. (2019). The two new clusters are: (1) tiredness and avoidance plus physical discomfort; and (2) symptom improvement through rest. One hundred one (101) individuals with voice disorders and 100 vocally healthy controls from a previous study that cross-validated the VFI-G participated in this study. In order to assess the validity of our newly adjusted VFI-G, independent samples t test, receiver operating characteristic curve, likelihood ratios and the Youden Index were calculated. The association of the two VF clusters with subject characteristics such as age, sex, type of voice disorder, and level of vocal usage was also analyzed using either a Pearson correlation or a one-way ANOVA for each of the two populations.
Significantly higher scores were obtained in voice-disordered subjects in both clusters (all P values < 0.001) than in healthy-voice subjects. The threshold for cluster 1 of the VFI-G was determined as ≥17.5 (74.3% sensitivity and 88.0% specificity). The results of cluster 2 are identical to that of factor 3 of the previous cross-validation study of the VFI-G. Most subject characteristics show no significant association with cluster 1 of the VFI-G, but cluster 2 seems to be moderately associated with age, type of voice disorder and level of vocal usage in the dysphonic population.
The restructured VFI-G showed improved validity and can be recommended for use in the assessment of VF. Cluster 2 is also moderately associated with several vocal fatigue-related subject characteristics of the dysphonic population.
嗓音疲劳指数(VFI)是一份包含19个条目的心理测量自评问卷,可用于识别嗓音疲劳(VF)个体并描述其症状。本研究旨在完善德语版(VFI-G)并评估嗓音障碍人群和对照组中与嗓音疲劳相关的其他特征。
VFI-G进行了结构调整,用基于Nanjundeswaran等人(2019年)的因子分析结果得出的两个聚类取代了原来构成问卷的三个因子:(1)嗓音疲劳和嗓音回避;(2)身体不适;(3)休息后症状改善。来自之前一项对VFI-G进行交叉验证研究的101名嗓音障碍个体和100名嗓音健康的对照者参与了本研究。为评估新调整的VFI-G的有效性,计算了独立样本t检验、受试者工作特征曲线、似然比和尤登指数。还分别对两组人群使用Pearson相关性分析或单因素方差分析,分析了两个VF聚类与年龄、性别、嗓音障碍类型和嗓音使用水平等受试者特征之间的关联。
嗓音障碍受试者在两个聚类中的得分均显著高于嗓音健康受试者(所有P值<0.001)。VFI-G聚类1的阈值确定为≥17.5(灵敏度为74.3%,特异度为88.0%)。聚类2的结果与之前VFI-G交叉验证研究中因子3的结果相同。大多数受试者特征与VFI-G的聚类1无显著关联,但聚类2似乎与嗓音障碍人群的年龄、嗓音障碍类型和嗓音使用水平存在中度关联。
重新构建的VFI-G显示出更好的有效性,可推荐用于嗓音疲劳的评估。聚类2也与嗓音障碍人群中一些与嗓音疲劳相关的受试者特征存在中度关联。