• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Both Default and Multiple-Demand Regions Represent Semantic Goal Information.默认网络和多重需求区域都代表语义目标信息。
J Neurosci. 2021 Apr 21;41(16):3679-3691. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1782-20.2021. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
2
Roles of the Default Mode and Multiple-Demand Networks in Naturalistic versus Symbolic Decisions.默认模式网络和多重需求网络在自然决策与符号决策中的作用。
J Neurosci. 2021 Mar 10;41(10):2214-2228. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1888-20.2020. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
3
A gradient from long-term memory to novel cognition: Transitions through default mode and executive cortex.从长期记忆到新颖认知的渐变:通过默认模式和执行皮层的转变。
Neuroimage. 2020 Oct 15;220:117074. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117074. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
4
Default mode network shows distinct emotional and contextual responses yet common effects of retrieval demands across tasks.默认模式网络表现出不同的情绪和情境反应,但在不同任务中存在共同的检索需求效应。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 May;45(7):e26703. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26703.
5
Distinctive and Complementary Roles of Default Mode Network Subsystems in Semantic Cognition.默认模式网络亚系统在语义认知中的独特和互补作用。
J Neurosci. 2024 May 15;44(20):e1907232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1907-23.2024.
6
The role of default mode network in semantic cue integration.默认模式网络在语义线索整合中的作用。
Neuroimage. 2020 Oct 1;219:117019. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117019. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
7
Flexing the principal gradient of the cerebral cortex to suit changing semantic task demands.灵活调整大脑皮层的主梯度以适应不断变化的语义任务需求。
Elife. 2022 Sep 28;11:e80368. doi: 10.7554/eLife.80368.
8
Exploring the role of the posterior middle temporal gyrus in semantic cognition: Integration of anterior temporal lobe with executive processes.探索颞中回后部在语义认知中的作用:颞叶前部与执行过程的整合。
Neuroimage. 2016 Aug 15;137:165-177. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.051. Epub 2016 May 25.
9
Large-scale reconfiguration of connectivity patterns among attentional networks during context-dependent adjustment of cognitive control.在基于上下文的认知控制调整过程中,注意力网络之间的连接模式进行大规模重新配置。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Aug 15;42(12):3821-3832. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25467. Epub 2021 May 14.
10
Functional integration and segregation during semantic cognition: Evidence across age groups.语义认知中的功能整合与分离:跨年龄组证据。
Cortex. 2024 Sep;178:157-173. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.06.015. Epub 2024 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Disentangling the neural correlates of semantic and domain-general control: The roles of stimulus domain and task process.厘清语义与领域通用控制的神经关联:刺激领域与任务过程的作用。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Feb 12;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00092. eCollection 2024.
2
Reduced temporal and spatial stability of neural activity patterns predict cognitive control deficits in children with ADHD.神经活动模式在时间和空间上稳定性的降低预示着多动症儿童的认知控制缺陷。
Nat Commun. 2025 Mar 8;16(1):2346. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57685-x.
3
Default Mode Network Functional Connectivity As a Transdiagnostic Biomarker of Cognitive Function.默认模式网络功能连接作为认知功能的跨诊断生物标志物
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2025 Apr;10(4):359-368. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.12.016. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
4
Macroscale brain states support the control of semantic cognition.宏观脑状态支持语义认知的控制。
Commun Biol. 2024 Aug 1;7(1):926. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06630-7.
5
Reduced temporal and spatial stability of neural activity patterns predict cognitive control deficits in children with ADHD.神经活动模式在时间和空间上稳定性的降低预示着多动症儿童的认知控制缺陷。
bioRxiv. 2024 May 30:2024.05.29.596493. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.29.596493.
6
Semantic processing in older adults is associated with distributed neural activation which varies by association and abstractness of words.老年人的语义处理与分布的神经激活有关,这种激活因词汇的关联性和抽象性而异。
Geroscience. 2024 Dec;46(6):6195-6212. doi: 10.1007/s11357-024-01216-x. Epub 2024 May 31.
7
Default mode network shows distinct emotional and contextual responses yet common effects of retrieval demands across tasks.默认模式网络表现出不同的情绪和情境反应,但在不同任务中存在共同的检索需求效应。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 May;45(7):e26703. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26703.
8
Distinctive and Complementary Roles of Default Mode Network Subsystems in Semantic Cognition.默认模式网络亚系统在语义认知中的独特和互补作用。
J Neurosci. 2024 May 15;44(20):e1907232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1907-23.2024.
9
How does the "default mode" network contribute to semantic cognition?“默认模式”网络如何促进语义认知?
Brain Lang. 2024 May;252:105405. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2024.105405. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
10
The Brain's Topographical Organization Shapes Dynamic Interaction Patterns That Support Flexible Behavior Based on Rules and Long-Term Knowledge.大脑的拓扑组织塑造了动态交互模式,这些模式支持基于规则和长期知识的灵活行为。
J Neurosci. 2024 May 29;44(22):e2223232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2223-23.2024.

默认网络和多重需求区域都代表语义目标信息。

Both Default and Multiple-Demand Regions Represent Semantic Goal Information.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom

Department of Psychology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Neurosci. 2021 Apr 21;41(16):3679-3691. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1782-20.2021. Epub 2021 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1782-20.2021
PMID:33664130
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8055078/
Abstract

We used a semantic feature-matching task combined with multivoxel pattern decoding to test contrasting accounts of the role of the default mode network (DMN) in cognitive flexibility. By one view, DMN and multiple-demand cortex have opposing roles in cognition, with DMN and multiple-demand regions within the dorsal attention network (DAN) supporting internal and external cognition, respectively. Consequently, while multiple-demand regions can decode current goal information, semantically relevant DMN regions might decode conceptual similarity regardless of task demands. Alternatively, DMN regions, like multiple-demand cortex, might show sensitivity to changing task demands, since both networks dynamically alter their patterns of connectivity depending on the context. Our task required human participants (any sex) to integrate conceptual knowledge with changing task goals, such that successive decisions were based on different features of the items (color, shape, and size). This allowed us to simultaneously decode semantic category and current goal information using whole-brain searchlight decoding. As expected, multiple-demand cortex, including DAN and frontoparietal control network, represented information about currently relevant conceptual features. Similar decoding results were found in DMN, including in angular gyrus and posterior cingulate cortex, indicating that DMN and multiple-demand regions can support the same function rather than being strictly competitive. Semantic category could be decoded in lateral occipital cortex independently of task demands, but not in most regions of DMN. Conceptual information related to the current goal dominates the multivariate response within DMN, which supports flexible retrieval by modulating its response to suit the task demands, alongside regions of multiple-demand cortex. We tested contrasting accounts of default mode network (DMN) function using multivoxel pattern analysis. By one view, semantically relevant parts of DMN represent conceptual similarity, regardless of task context. By an alternative view, DMN tracks changing task demands. Our semantic feature-matching task required participants to integrate conceptual knowledge with task goals, such that successive decisions were based on different features of the items. We demonstrate that DMN regions can decode the current goal, as it is applied, alongside multiple-demand regions traditionally associated with cognitive control, speaking to how DMN supports flexible cognition.

摘要

我们使用语义特征匹配任务结合多体素模式解码来测试默认模式网络(DMN)在认知灵活性中的作用的对比理论。根据一种观点,DMN 和多需求皮层在认知中具有相反的作用,DMN 和背侧注意网络(DAN)中的多个需求区域分别支持内部和外部认知。因此,虽然多需求区域可以解码当前目标信息,但语义相关的 DMN 区域可能会解码概念相似性,而不管任务需求如何。或者,DMN 区域可能像多需求皮层一样对不断变化的任务需求敏感,因为这两个网络都根据上下文动态改变它们的连接模式。我们的任务要求人类参与者(任何性别)将概念知识与不断变化的任务目标相结合,以便连续的决策基于项目的不同特征(颜色、形状和大小)。这使我们能够使用全脑搜索光解码同时解码语义类别和当前目标信息。不出所料,多需求皮层,包括 DAN 和额顶控制网络,代表了与当前相关概念特征的信息。在 DMN 中也发现了类似的解码结果,包括在角回和后扣带回皮层,表明 DMN 和多需求区域可以支持相同的功能,而不是严格竞争。语义类别可以在不需要任务的情况下在外侧枕叶皮层中解码,但在大多数 DMN 区域中则不能。与当前目标相关的概念信息在 DMN 内的多元反应中占主导地位,这通过调节其对任务需求的反应来支持灵活的检索,与多需求皮层区域一起。我们使用多体素模式分析测试了默认模式网络(DMN)功能的对比理论。根据一种观点,DMN 的语义相关部分代表概念相似性,而不管任务上下文如何。根据另一种观点,DMN 跟踪不断变化的任务需求。我们的语义特征匹配任务要求参与者将概念知识与任务目标相结合,以便连续的决策基于项目的不同特征。我们证明 DMN 区域可以解码当前目标,因为它是应用的,以及与认知控制传统相关的多需求区域,说明 DMN 如何支持灵活的认知。