Mao Yun-He, Sun Wei-Hao, Xiong Yan, Chen Gang, Li Qi, Tang Xin, Fu Wei-Li, Li Jian
Department of Orthopaedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China.
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2021 Feb 25;34(2):114-20. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2021.02.004.
To compare therapeutic efficacy of modified single-needle arthroscopic repair technique and Fast-Fix technique in repairing longitudinal meniscus injuries.
From July 2016 to July 2017, patients with longitudinal meniscus injuries who underwent meniscal repair surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Ninety-one patients treated with modified single-needle technique and 77 patients were treated with Fast-Fix technique, the average age were (26.7±7.6) and (27.9±6.1) years old respectively, the average lengths of follow-up were (32.5±9.2) and (33.2±11.9) months, respectively. Operation cost, suture time, intraoperative failure rate and postoperative failure rate were used as clinical outcomes, MRI of knee joint was used as main diagnosis and evaluation basis; 2000 IKDC subjective score, Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale were compared between two groups preoperatively, 12 months after operation and at the latest follow-up. Intraoperative and postopertaive complications were observed.
Compared with Fast-Fix group, patients in modified single-needle technique group had lower operation costs [(645.7±133.1 vs.(12 184.8±4 709.8), <0.01)], and average time per suture was shorter[(4.5±2.1) vs.(5.9±2.7), <0.001)];and there were no significant difference in intraoperative failure rate and postoperative failure rate between two groups. There were no statistical differences in subjective function score, Lysholm score, Tegner activity knee joint at 12 months after opertaion and the latest follow-up (>0.05);These scores between two groups at the latest followup were significantly improved compared with those of before operation(<0.000 1).
Modified single-needle arthrscopicrepair technique could achieve the similar therapeutic efficacy as Fast-Fix technique, and it has advantageds of simple opertion and more economical. This study recommends clinical application of modified single-needle arthrscopic repair technique in treating meniscus injuries.
比较改良单针关节镜修复技术与Fast-Fix技术修复半月板纵行损伤的疗效。
回顾性分析2016年7月至2017年7月期间接受半月板修复手术的半月板纵行损伤患者。采用改良单针技术治疗的患者91例,采用Fast-Fix技术治疗的患者77例,平均年龄分别为(26.7±7.6)岁和(27.9±6.1)岁,平均随访时间分别为(32.5±9.2)个月和(33.2±11.9)个月。将手术费用、缝合时间、术中失败率和术后失败率作为临床结局指标,以膝关节MRI作为主要诊断和评估依据;比较两组术前、术后12个月及末次随访时的2000IKDC主观评分、Lysholm评分和Tegner活动量表评分。观察术中及术后并发症。
与Fast-Fix组相比,改良单针技术组患者的手术费用更低[(645.7±133.1) 比(12184.8±4709.8),<0.01],平均每针缝合时间更短[(4.5±2.1) 比(5.9±2.7),<0.001];两组术中失败率和术后失败率差异无统计学意义。术后12个月及末次随访时两组的主观功能评分、Lysholm评分、Tegner活动量表评分差异无统计学意义(>0.05);两组末次随访时的这些评分与术前相比均有显著改善(<0.0001)。
改良单针关节镜修复技术可取得与Fast-Fix技术相似的治疗效果,且具有操作简单、更经济的优点。本研究推荐改良单针关节镜修复技术在半月板损伤治疗中的临床应用。