Yang Lawrence H, Blasco Drew, Lieff Sarah A, Le PhuongThao D, Li YiPing, Broeker Marianne, Mascayano Franco, Bello Iruma, Nossel Ilana, Dixon Lisa
From the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University (Dr. Yang; Mss. Blasco and Lieff); Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University (Dr. Yang and Mr. Mascayano); Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (Dr. Le); Clinical Psychology, Teacher's College, Columbia University (Mss. Li and Broeker); Division of Behavioral Health Services and Policy Research (Mr. Mascayano and Dr. Nossel), New York State Psychiatric Institute (Drs. Bello and Dixon), New York, NY; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY (Drs. Bello, Nossel, and Dixon).
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2021;29(2):131-141. doi: 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000288.
Early intervention services (EIS; in the United States, Coordinated Specialty Care) can lead to substantial improvements in psychiatric symptoms and social functioning for individuals with first-episode psychosis who engage in treatment. Nevertheless, stigma associated with early intervention services can limit their full potential benefits by preventing or reducing participation. Drawing from Corrigan's "why try" model positing relationships between public and self-stigma, engagement in treatment services, and the EIS treatment model, this article proposes a framework that delineates how distinct forms of stigma are linked to given stages of treatment engagement in first-episode psychosis. We identify three phases of engagement: (1) community outreach, which has associations with public stigma; (2) the referral and evaluation process, which primarily has associations with self-stigma; and (3) EIS, which have associations with self-stigma and its psychosocial consequences. For each phase, we describe evidence-based strategies typically provided by EIS programs, using OnTrackNY as an exemplary model, to illustrate potential linkages in our conceptual framework. By specifying how distinct forms of stigma are associated with EIS treatment stages, this framework is intended to guide EIS programs in explicitly addressing stigma to optimize recovery of individuals with first-episode psychosis.
早期干预服务(在美国为综合专科护理)可以使接受治疗的首发精神病患者的精神症状和社会功能得到显著改善。然而,与早期干预服务相关的污名化可能会通过阻碍或减少参与而限制其潜在益处。本文借鉴科里根的“为何尝试”模型,该模型假定了公众污名与自我污名、参与治疗服务以及早期干预服务治疗模式之间的关系,提出了一个框架,阐述了不同形式的污名如何与首发精神病治疗参与的特定阶段相联系。我们确定了参与的三个阶段:(1)社区外展,与公众污名相关;(2)转诊和评估过程,主要与自我污名相关;(3)早期干预服务,与自我污名及其心理社会后果相关。对于每个阶段,我们描述了早期干预服务项目通常提供的循证策略,并以纽约OnTrack项目为例,来说明我们概念框架中的潜在联系。通过明确不同形式的污名如何与早期干预服务治疗阶段相关联,该框架旨在指导早期干预服务项目明确应对污名化问题,以优化首发精神病患者的康复效果。