Suppr超能文献

精神病超高风险的污名:更新的系统综述。

Stigma of ultra-high risk for psychosis: an updated systematic review.

机构信息

Laboratório de Neurociências, Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Department of Psychiatry Ibn Omrane, Razi Hospital, The Tunisian Center of Early Intervention in Psychosis, Manouba, Tunisia. Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Tunis El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia.

出版信息

Braz J Psychiatry. 2024;46:e20233385. doi: 10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3385. Epub 2024 Jan 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the stigma associated with schizophrenia has also been directed towards people at ultra-high risk of psychosis (UHR), the present review aimed to synthetize the literature to update and extend our understanding of this topic.

METHODS

A systematic review compliant with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for articles published until April 30, 2023, using a combination of search terms describing at-risk mental states for psychosis, stigma, and related terms.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight studies were included. Twenty-nine addressed individuals with UHR directly, and nine conducted interviews with non-patients regarding UHR. A total of 2,560 individuals with UHR were assessed, with a mean sample size of 88.3 participants. Most were quantitative non-randomized/observational studies with young adults, 71.4% used the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes, and 25% used the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States. Overall, the studies mainly involved patients of UHR clinics from high-income Western countries. The described stigma can be grouped into five forms, the most frequently explored of which was perceived public stigma, followed by public stigma, self-stigma/internalized stigma, stigma stress, and associative stigma. Quantitative nonrandomized studies predominated: only one was an interventional study. Most of the results confirmed the presence of stigma toward individuals with UHR.

CONCLUSION

Despite the knowledge gaps and scarcity of research on UHR-related stigma, the results suggest that stigma toward people with UHR exists and that it is already present at early stages of psychosis.

摘要

目的

确定与精神分裂症相关的污名是否也指向精神病超高风险人群(UHR),本综述旨在综合文献,以更新和扩展我们对这一主题的理解。

方法

在 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 和 Web of Science 数据库中,按照系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目的指南进行了系统综述,使用了描述精神病风险心理状态、污名和相关术语的组合搜索词,检索截至 2023 年 4 月 30 日发表的文章。

结果

共纳入 38 项研究。29 项直接针对 UHR 个体,9 项对非患者进行了关于 UHR 的访谈。共评估了 2560 名 UHR 个体,平均样本量为 88.3 名参与者。大多数为年轻成年人的定量非随机/观察性研究,71.4%使用精神分裂症风险综合征的结构化访谈,25%使用风险精神状态的综合评估。总体而言,这些研究主要涉及来自高收入西方国家 UHR 诊所的患者。描述的污名可以分为五种形式,其中最常探讨的是感知到的公众污名,其次是公众污名、自我污名/内化污名、污名压力和关联污名。定量非随机研究占主导地位:只有一项是干预性研究。大多数结果证实了对 UHR 个体存在污名。

结论

尽管对 UHR 相关污名的知识空白和研究稀缺,但结果表明,对 UHR 人群的污名确实存在,而且已经存在于精神病的早期阶段。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d21a/11302994/60413de93131/bjp-46-e20233385-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验