Department of Orthodontics, Gazi University Dentistry Faculty, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Gazi University Dentistry Faculty, Ankara, Turkey.
J Orofac Orthop. 2021 Nov;82(6):403-412. doi: 10.1007/s00056-021-00281-7. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
The goal was to evaluate the effects of Angle class II malocclusion treatment using the Forsus fatigue resistant device (FRD, 3M, St. Paul, MN, USA) on the position and angulation of mandibular third molars and retromolar space.
In all, 58 class II patients (mean age 13.6 ± 1.8 years) treated with the FRD (FRD group) were compared with 51 class I patients (mean age 13.5 ± 1.6 years) who underwent orthodontic treatment (control group). A total of 109 mandibular third molars in the FRD group and 91 in the control group were evaluated. Changes in the retromolar space, angulation of the second (ɣ) and third molars (β), and the angle between these teeth (α) were assessed with panoramic radiographs taken at the beginning and the end of the treatment. Data were statistically analyzed.
At the end of the treatment, there were significant increases in ɣ and β in the FRD group and ɣ in the control group (p < 0.05). The decrease in α in the FRD group and increase in the control group were not significant (p > 0.05); however, this change led to a small significant change between the groups (p < 0.05). The retromolar space significantly increased in the FRD group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). No significant correlation was found between retromolar space and third molar uprighting in any of the groups (p > 0.05).
Class II correction with FRD led to mesialization of the lower arch which provided an increase in the retromolar space. Little improvement in the uprighting of the third molars occurred.
评估 Forsus 疲劳阻力装置(FRD,3M,明尼苏达州圣保罗)治疗安氏 II 类错颌畸形对下颌第三磨牙位置和磨牙后区间隙的影响。
共有 58 名接受 FRD(FRD 组)治疗的安氏 II 类错颌患者(平均年龄 13.6±1.8 岁)与 51 名接受正畸治疗的安氏 I 类错颌患者(平均年龄 13.5±1.6 岁)(对照组)进行比较。FRD 组共评估 109 颗下颌第三磨牙,对照组评估 91 颗。使用治疗前后的全景片评估磨牙后区间隙、第二磨牙(ɣ)和第三磨牙(β)的倾斜角以及这两颗牙齿之间的角度(α)的变化。对数据进行统计学分析。
治疗结束时,FRD 组的ɣ和β以及对照组的ɣ均显著增加(p<0.05)。FRD 组的α减小,对照组的α增加,但无统计学意义(p>0.05);然而,这一变化导致两组间有较小的显著差异(p<0.05)。FRD 组的磨牙后区间隙显著大于对照组(p<0.05)。在任何一组中,磨牙后区间隙与第三磨牙直立均无显著相关性(p>0.05)。
FRD 矫正安氏 II 类错颌导致下颌弓的近中移动,从而增加磨牙后区间隙。第三磨牙的直立度略有改善。