Suppr超能文献

是否使用“产科暴力”一词:对斯沃茨和拉佩曼文章的评论。

To Use or Not to Use the Term "Obstetric Violence": Commentary on the Article by Swartz and Lappeman.

机构信息

Université du Québec À Montréal (UQAM), Canada.

University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Violence Against Women. 2021 Jun;27(8):1009-1018. doi: 10.1177/1077801221996456. Epub 2021 Mar 5.

Abstract

Based on the article by Swartz and Lappeman, we propose in this commentary to reflect on three central components linked to the concept of obstetric violence: the withdrawal of intentionality as a founding element of its recognition, the preponderant place given to the perspective of women and those affected by it, as well as the recognition of its sexist, gendered, and systemic character. We also discuss the epistemic injustice associated with obstetric violence. We stress the importance of including both health workers and health systems in the equation, even though they may be offended by the use of the term. We conclude by recalling that significant leadership must be exercised by health care workers and institutions to put an end to this form of violence.

摘要

基于 Swartz 和 Lappeman 的文章,我们在这篇评论中提出反思与产科暴力概念相关的三个核心组成部分:将意图的撤回作为其识别的基本要素、给予女性和受其影响的人的观点以主导地位,以及承认其具有性别歧视、性别化和系统性的特征。我们还讨论了与产科暴力相关的认识不公正。我们强调将卫生工作者和卫生系统都纳入这一问题的重要性,即使他们可能会对使用这个术语感到不满。最后,我们回顾了卫生保健工作者和机构必须发挥重要领导作用,以结束这种形式的暴力。

相似文献

2
The Dangers of Minimizing Obstetric Violence.《轻视产科暴力的危害》
Violence Against Women. 2023 Jul;29(9):1899-1908. doi: 10.1177/10778012211037379. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
6
Invisible wounds: obstetric violence in the United States.无形的创伤:美国的产科暴力
Reprod Health Matters. 2016 May;24(47):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.rhm.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
9
Evidence of 'obstetric violence' in India: an integrative review.印度“产科暴力”的证据:综合评价。
J Biosoc Sci. 2020 Jul;52(4):610-628. doi: 10.1017/S0021932019000695. Epub 2019 Nov 14.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验