Centre for Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382355, India; Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A1G1, Canada; Department of Liberal Arts, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Telangana 502285, India.
Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A1G1, Canada; Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada.
Curr Biol. 2021 Apr 26;31(8):1678-1686.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.097. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
Motor skill retention is typically measured by asking participants to reproduce previously learned movements from memory. The analog of this retention test (recall memory) in human verbal memory is known to underestimate how much learning is actually retained. Here we asked whether information about previously learned movements, which can no longer be reproduced, is also retained. Following visuomotor adaptation, we used tests of recall that involved reproduction of previously learned movements and tests of recognition in which participants were asked whether a candidate limb displacement, produced by a robot arm held by the subject, corresponded to a movement direction that was experienced during active training. The main finding was that 24 h after training, estimates of recognition memory were about twice as accurate as those of recall memory. Thus, there is information about previously learned movements that is not retrieved using recall testing but can be accessed in tests of recognition. We conducted additional tests to assess whether, 24 h after learning, recall for previously learned movements could be improved by presenting passive movements as retrieval cues. These tests were conducted immediately prior to recall testing and involved the passive playback of a small number of movements, which were spread across the workspace and included both adapted and baseline movements, without being marked as such. This technique restored recall memory for movements to levels close to those of recognition memory performance. Thus, somatic information may enable retrieval of otherwise inaccessible motor memories.
运动技能保持通常通过要求参与者从记忆中再现先前学习的动作来测量。在人类言语记忆中,这种保留测试(回忆记忆)的类似物被认为低估了实际保留的学习量。在这里,我们询问先前学习的运动信息,这些信息不再可再现,是否也被保留。在视觉运动适应后,我们使用了回忆测试,涉及再现先前学习的运动,以及识别测试,参与者被要求判断由受试者持有的机器人臂产生的候选肢体位移是否对应于在主动训练期间经历的运动方向。主要发现是,在训练 24 小时后,识别记忆的估计比回忆记忆的估计准确约两倍。因此,有关于先前学习的运动的信息,这些信息不能通过回忆测试检索,但可以在识别测试中访问。我们进行了额外的测试,以评估在学习 24 小时后,通过将被动运动作为检索线索,是否可以改善对先前学习的运动的回忆。这些测试是在回忆测试之前进行的,涉及少数运动的被动播放,这些运动分布在工作空间中,包括适应和基线运动,而没有标记为这样。该技术将运动的回忆记忆恢复到接近识别记忆性能的水平。因此,躯体信息可能能够检索原本无法访问的运动记忆。