Suppr超能文献

应用基于 gB 的实时定量 PCR 检测猪鼻拭子和口腔液标本中的伪狂犬病(奥耶斯基病)病毒 DNA。

Pseudorabies (Aujeszky's disease) virus DNA detection in swine nasal swab and oral fluid specimens using a gB-based real-time quantitative PCR.

机构信息

Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.

Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.

出版信息

Prev Vet Med. 2021 Apr;189:105308. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105308. Epub 2021 Feb 24.

Abstract

In this study, the detection of PRV DNA in nasal swab (n = 440) and oral fluid (n = 1,545) samples collected over time from experimentally PRV vaccinated and/or PRV inoculated pigs (n = 40) was comparatively evaluated by real-time PCR. Serum samples (n = 440) were tested by PRV gB/gE blocking ELISAs (Pseudorabies Virus gB Antibody Test Kit and Pseudorabies Virus gpI Antibody Test Kit, IDEXX Laboratories, Inc., Westbrook, ME) to monitor PRV status over time. Following exposure to a gE-deleted modified live vaccine (Ingelvac® Aujeszky MLV, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, CT) and/or a wild-type virus (3 CR Ossabaw), PRV gB DNA was detected in oral fluid specimens in a pattern similar to that of nasal swabs. For quantitative analyses, PRV PCR quantification cycle (Cq) results were re-expressed as "efficiency standardized Cqs (ECqs)" as a function of PCR efficiency using plate-specific positive amplification controls. ROC analyses of the PRV gB PCR ECqs results showed a similar performance of the PRV gB PCR for nasal swab and oral fluid specimens (area under the ROC curve = 85 % vs 83 %) and, based on an ECq cutoff of 0.01 a diagnostic specificity of 100 % and diagnostic sensitivities for oral fluid and nasal swab specimens of 53 % (95 % CI: 43 %, 62 %) and 70 % (95 % CI: 55 %, 83 %), respectively. Thus, the results described herein demonstrated the detection of PRV gB DNA in swine oral fluid and supported the use of this specimen in PRV diagnosis and surveillance.

摘要

本研究通过实时 PCR 比较评估了从经 PRV 疫苗接种和/或 PRV 接种的实验猪(n=40)随时间采集的鼻拭子(n=440)和口腔液(n=1545)样本中 PRV DNA 的检测。血清样本(n=440)通过 PRV gB/gE 阻断 ELISA(猪伪狂犬病病毒 gB 抗体检测试剂盒和猪伪狂犬病病毒 gpI 抗体检测试剂盒,IDEXX 实验室,Inc.,韦斯特布鲁克,ME)进行检测,以监测随时间推移的 PRV 状态。在接触 gE 缺失的活疫苗(Ingelvac® Aujeszky MLV,Boehringer Ingelheim,Ridgefield,CT)和/或野生型病毒(3 CR Ossabaw)后,PRV gB DNA 以类似于鼻拭子的模式在口腔液标本中被检测到。对于定量分析,将 PRV PCR 定量循环(Cq)结果重新表示为“效率标准化 Cq(ECq)”,作为使用板特异性阳性扩增对照的 PCR 效率的函数。PRV gB PCR ECq 结果的 ROC 分析显示,PRV gB PCR 对鼻拭子和口腔液标本具有相似的性能(ROC 曲线下面积=85%对 83%),并且基于 ECq 截止值 0.01,口腔液和鼻拭子标本的诊断特异性分别为 100%和 53%(95%CI:43%,62%)和 70%(95%CI:55%,83%)。因此,本文所述的结果表明可以在猪口腔液中检测到 PRV gB DNA,并支持使用该样本进行 PRV 诊断和监测。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验