Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Ambientale, del Territorio, Edile e di Chimica, Politecnico di Bari, Via E. Orabona, 4, I-70125 Bari, Italy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 13;18(4):1820. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041820.
Anaerobic digestion (AD) of organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) is considered an excellent solution for both waste management and energy generation, although the impacts of waste collection and transportation on the whole management system are not negligible. AD is often regarded as a centralized solution for an entire community, although recently, there has been some debate on the adoption of decentralized, smaller facilities. This study aims to evaluate the techno-economic feasibility of an AD plant at the local scale for the treatment of organic waste generated from urban districts. Depending on the type of feedstock, two scenarios were evaluated and compared with the reference scenario, based on composting treatment: (1) mono-AD of OFMSW and (2) co-AD of OFMSW and sewage sludge (SS). Furthermore, different district extensions of the metropolitan area were considered with the goal of determining the optimal size. Results showed the advantage of the two scenarios over the reference one. Scenario 1 proved to be the most suitable solution, because the introduction of SS in Scenario 2 increased costs and payback time, rather than generating a higher waste amount and lower biogas yield. The preferred district extension was the medium-sized one. Capital cost strongly affected the economic analysis, but revenue from the city for the management operation of the organic waste could significantly decrease costs. Further studies about the differences in the type of feedstock or the introduction of other criteria of analysis (such as environmental) are considered necessary.
厌氧消化(AD)有机垃圾(OFMSW)被认为是一种很好的解决方案,用于废物管理和能源发电,尽管废物收集和运输对整个管理系统的影响不可忽视。AD 通常被视为整个社区的集中解决方案,尽管最近,对于采用分散的、较小的设施,已经有一些争议。本研究旨在评估 AD 工厂在地方尺度上处理城市地区产生的有机废物的技术经济可行性。根据原料类型,评估了两种方案,并与基于堆肥处理的参考方案进行了比较:(1)OFMSW 的单级 AD 和(2)OFMSW 和污水污泥(SS)的共级 AD。此外,还考虑了不同的都市区扩展,以确定最佳规模。结果表明,两种方案优于参考方案。方案 1 被证明是最合适的解决方案,因为在方案 2 中引入 SS 增加了成本和投资回报期,而不是产生更多的废物量和更低的沼气产量。首选的区域扩展是中型区域。资本成本对经济分析有很大影响,但城市对有机废物管理运营的收入可以显著降低成本。需要进一步研究不同类型的原料或引入其他分析标准(如环境)的差异。