National Time Service Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi'an 710600, China.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Feb 25;21(5):1596. doi: 10.3390/s21051596.
A quality evaluation of precise products for BDS-3 constellations is presented for the first time in this contribution. Then, the tropospheric delay retrieval and positioning performance of BDS-3 precise point positioning (PPP) solutions using the precise products (gbm, wum, iac, sha, cnt) with observations from 24 stations from DOY 280 to 317 in 2020 was comprehensively investigated. The orbit comparisons present consistencies of 0.09-0.22 m for the C19-C37 satellites and of 0.5-1.2 m for the C38-C46 satellites among the final products. The standard deviation (STD) values of the clock differences of iac showed the best agreement with those of gbm, followed by wum, sha. The clock differences performance of cnt was the worst. For BDS-3 PPP solutions with five Analysis centers (ACs) products, the median convergence times of static PPP mode incorporating the gbm, wum, iac, sha, and cnt products were 31.0, 33.5, 34.5, 37.8, and 72.0 min, respectively; the median convergence times of kinematic PPP model incorporating the same products were 40.5, 41.0, 50.5, 55.0, and 94.0 min, respectively. The positioning accuracies in the static and kinematic modes were approximately 1-4 cm, 2-6 cm in the horizontal and vertical components, respectively. With the final products in kinematic mode, the performance of PPP with real-time products (cnt) is poorer than all PPP with final products. The median of ZTD accuracies of the five products gbm, wum, iac, sha, and cnt were 7.84, 7.58, 7.04, 7.19, and 10.1 mm, respectively, and the accuracy differences were very small among five AC products (gbm, wum, iac, sha).
本文首次对 BDS-3 星座精密产品进行质量评估。然后,综合利用 2020 年 24 个测站 DOY280 至 317 日观测数据的精密产品(gbm、wum、iac、sha、cnt),对 BDS-3 精密单点定位(PPP)解的对流层延迟反演和定位性能进行了全面研究。轨道比较结果表明,最终产品中 C19-C37 卫星的一致性为 0.09-0.22 m,C38-C46 卫星的一致性为 0.5-1.2 m。iac 钟差的标准差(STD)值与 gbm 的吻合度最好,其次是 wum 和 sha,cnt 的钟差性能最差。对于包含 gbm、wum、iac、sha 和 cnt 产品的五个分析中心(AC)的 BDS-3 PPP 解,静态 PPP 模式的中位数收敛时间分别为 31.0、33.5、34.5、37.8 和 72.0 min,动态 PPP 模式的中位数收敛时间分别为 40.5、41.0、50.5、55.0 和 94.0 min。静态和动态模式的定位精度分别约为 1-4 cm 和 2-6 cm,水平和垂直分量。在动态模式下使用最终产品,实时产品(cnt)的 PPP 性能比所有使用最终产品的 PPP 性能都差。gbm、wum、iac、sha 和 cnt 这五个产品的 ZTD 精度中位数分别为 7.84、7.58、7.04、7.19 和 10.1 mm,五个 AC 产品(gbm、wum、iac、sha)之间的精度差异非常小。