Gao Meng, Cao Zhihua, Meng Ziheng, Tan Chunbo, Zhu Huizhong, Huang Lu
School of Geomatics, Liaoning Technical University (LNTU), Fuxin 123000, China.
The 54th Research Institute of China Electronics Technology Group Corporation, Shijiazhuang 050000, China.
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jun 26;23(13):5935. doi: 10.3390/s23135935.
With the continuous construction and development of the BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS), its positioning performance is constantly being improved. In this study, the positioning performance of different frequency combinations of BDS-3/GPS/Galileo in the Asia-Pacific region was investigated. The precision products of Wuhan University and the observation data of nine MGEX stations were selected to compare and analyze the B1I\B1C\B2a\B3I and L1\E1 pseudo-range Standard Point Positioning (SPP) and B1IB2a\B1IB3I\B1CB2a\B1CB3I\B2aB3I\L1L2\E1E5a precise point positioning (PPP) performance, while B1I\B3I\L1 SPP and B1IB3I PPP were investigated using BDS-2 with QZSS supplemented with BDS-3 and GPS. The experimental results showed that the positioning precision of BDS-3/GPS/Galileo SPP was in the order of B1C > E1 > L1 > B1I > B3I > B2a, and it was not significantly improved after BDS-2 and QZSS were added. Moreover, for the PPP of different frequency combinations, the convergence speed was in the order of L1L2 > B1IB3I > E1E5a > B1CB3I > B1CB2a > B1IB2a > B2aB3I. After adding BDS-2, B1IB3I improved by about 11% in static mode and 27% in kinematic mode, which was similar to the L1L2 frequency combination. The positioning precision of different frequency combinations of BDS-3/GPS/Galileo was B1IB3I > B1CB3I > L1L2 > E1E5a > B1B2a > B1CB2a > B2aB3I. In static mode, after adding BDS-2, B1IB3I did not show significant improvement in the plane direction, and showed ~61% improvement in the elevation direction, and ~67% in the three-dimensional (3D) direction. In kinematic mode, after adding BDS-2, B1IB3I was improved by about 16% in the E direction, the N direction did not show significant change, it improved by ~38% in the U direction and by ~70% in the 3D direction. In general, the positioning performance of BDS-3 was slightly better than those of GPS and Galileo in the Asia-Pacific region, and it is believed that with the continuous development of BDS, its positioning performance will surely be improved further.
随着北斗导航卫星系统(BDS)的不断建设与发展,其定位性能持续提升。本研究对亚太地区BDS-3/GPS/伽利略不同频率组合的定位性能进行了研究。选取了武汉大学的精密产品以及9个MGEX站的观测数据,对B1I\B1C\B2a\B3I和L1\E1伪距单点定位(SPP)以及B1IB2a\B1IB3I\B1CB2a\B1CB3I\B2aB3I\L1L2\E1E5a精密单点定位(PPP)性能进行比较分析,同时利用BDS-2并辅以QZSS以及BDS-3和GPS对B1I\B3I\L1 SPP和B1IB3I PPP进行研究。实验结果表明,BDS-3/GPS/伽利略SPP的定位精度顺序为B1C>E1>L1>B1I>B3I>B2a,添加BDS-2和QZSS后提升不显著。此外,对于不同频率组合的PPP,收敛速度顺序为L1L2>B1IB3I>E1E5a>B1CB3I>B1CB2a>B1IB2a>B2aB3I。添加BDS-2后,B1IB3I在静态模式下提升约11%,在动态模式下提升约27%,与L1L2频率组合相近。BDS-3/GPS/伽利略不同频率组合的定位精度为B1IB3I>B1CB3I>L1L2>E1E5a>B1B2a>B1CB2a>B2aB3I。在静态模式下,添加BDS-2后,B1IB3I在平面方向提升不显著,在高程方向提升约61%,在三维(3D)方向提升约67%。在动态模式下,添加BDS-2后,B1IB3I在E方向提升约16%,N方向变化不显著,在U方向提升约38%,在3D方向提升约70%。总体而言,在亚太地区BDS-3的定位性能略优于GPS和伽利略,且随着BDS的不断发展,其定位性能必将进一步提升。