Zhang Yu, Yuan Yuan, Zhang Li-Hua, Zhu Dan, Wang Lu, Wei Lan-Ping, Fan Wen-Sheng, Zhao Chang-Run, Su Yan-Jing, Liao Jian-Qi, Yong Lu, Wei Tian-Chao, Wei Ping, Mo Mei-Lan
College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China.
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Feb 11;9(2):146. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9020146.
Infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) poses massive economic losses in the global poultry industry. Here, we firstly report the construction and immunogenicity comparison of virus-like particles (VLPs) carrying the S, M and E proteins (SME-VLPs); VLPs carrying the S and M proteins (SM-VLPs); and VLPs carrying the M and E proteins (ME-VLPs) from the dominant serotype representative strain GX-YL5 in China. The neutralizing antibody response induced by the SME-VLPs was similar to that induced by the inactivated oil vaccine (OEV) of GX-YL5, and higher than those induced by the SM-VLPs, ME-VLPs and commercial live vaccine H120. More importantly, the SME-VLPs elicited higher percentages of CD4 and CD8 T lymphocytes than the SM-VLPs, ME-VLPs and OEV of GX-YL5. Compared with the OEV of GX-YL5, higher levels of IL-4 and IFN-γ were also induced by the SME-VLPs. Moreover, the mucosal immune response (sIgA) induced by the SME-VLPs in the tear and oral swabs was comparable to that induced by the H120 vaccine and higher than that induced by the OEV of GX-YL5. In the challenge experiment, the SME-VLPs resulted in significantly lower viral RNA levels in the trachea and higher protection scores than the OEV of GX-YL5 and H120 vaccines, and induced comparable viral RNA levels in the kidneys, and tear and oral swabs to the OEV of GX-YL5. In summary, among the three VLPs, the SME-VLPs carrying the S, M and E proteins of IBV could stimulate the strongest humoral, cellular and mucosal immune responses and provide effective protection, indicating that it would be an attractive vaccine candidate for IB.
传染性支气管炎病毒(IBV)给全球家禽业造成了巨大的经济损失。在此,我们首次报道了携带S、M和E蛋白的病毒样颗粒(SME-VLPs)、携带S和M蛋白的病毒样颗粒(SM-VLPs)以及携带M和E蛋白的病毒样颗粒(ME-VLPs)的构建及其免疫原性比较,这些病毒样颗粒来自中国优势血清型代表性毒株GX-YL5。SME-VLPs诱导的中和抗体反应与GX-YL5灭活油乳剂疫苗(OEV)诱导的相似,且高于SM-VLPs、ME-VLPs和商业活疫苗H120诱导的中和抗体反应。更重要的是,SME-VLPs诱导的CD4和CD8 T淋巴细胞百分比高于SM-VLPs、ME-VLPs以及GX-YL5的OEV。与GX-YL5的OEV相比,SME-VLPs还诱导产生了更高水平的IL-4和IFN-γ。此外,SME-VLPs在泪液和口腔拭子中诱导的黏膜免疫反应(sIgA)与H120疫苗诱导的相当,且高于GX-YL5的OEV诱导的。在攻毒实验中,SME-VLPs导致气管中的病毒RNA水平显著低于GX-YL5的OEV和H120疫苗,保护评分更高,并且在肾脏、泪液和口腔拭子中诱导的病毒RNA水平与GX-YL5的OEV相当。总之,在这三种病毒样颗粒中,携带IBV S、M和E蛋白的SME-VLPs能刺激最强的体液、细胞和黏膜免疫反应并提供有效保护,表明它将是一种有吸引力的IB疫苗候选物。