Department of Healthy Living, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Schipholweg 77, 2316 ZL Leiden, The Netherlands.
Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University, Amsterdam UMC, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 11;18(4):1775. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041775.
Intervention mapping (IM) is a method to systematically design interventions that is applied regularly within the public health domain. This study investigates whether IM is effectively used within the occupational safety and health domain as well. Specifically, this study explores the relation between the fidelity regarding the use of the IM protocol for intervention development, the implementation process and the effectiveness of the occupational risk prevention and health promotion interventions. A systematic review was conducted including articles on development, implementation, and effects of occupational risk prevention and health promotion interventions that were developed according to the IM-protocol. By means of a checklist, two authors reviewed the articles and rated them on several indicators regarding the fidelity of the IM-protocol, the implementation process, and the intervention effect. A literature search resulted in a total of 12 interventions as described in 38 articles. The fidelity to the IM-protocol was relatively low for participation throughout the development process and implementation planning. No relationship was found between fidelity of the IM-protocol and the intervention effect. A theory-based approach (as one of the core elements of IM) appears to be positively related to a successful implementation process. Results of the review suggest that organizing a participative approach and implementation planning is difficult in practice. In addition, results imply that conducting matrices of change objectives as part of the intervention development, although challenging and time-consuming, may ultimately pay off, resulting in a tailored intervention that matches the target group.
干预映射(IM)是一种系统地设计干预措施的方法,在公共卫生领域经常应用。本研究调查了 IM 在职业安全与健康领域是否也得到了有效应用。具体来说,本研究探讨了干预开发过程中 IM 协议使用的保真度、实施过程和职业风险预防和健康促进干预措施的有效性之间的关系。本研究进行了系统评价,纳入了根据 IM 协议开发的职业风险预防和健康促进干预措施的发展、实施和效果的文章。通过检查表,两位作者对文章进行了回顾,并对 IM 协议的保真度、实施过程和干预效果的几个指标进行了评分。文献检索共得到 12 项干预措施,描述在 38 篇文章中。整个开发过程和实施计划的参与度对 IM 协议的保真度相对较低。没有发现 IM 协议的保真度与干预效果之间存在关系。基于理论的方法(IM 的核心要素之一)似乎与成功的实施过程呈正相关。综述结果表明,在实践中组织参与式方法和实施计划具有一定难度。此外,结果表明,作为干预开发的一部分,进行变化目标矩阵,尽管具有挑战性且耗时,但最终可能会得到回报,从而制定出适合目标群体的针对性干预措施。