• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直升机紧急医疗服务和医院治疗水平影响小儿创伤患者的生存率。

Helicopter Emergency Medical Service and Hospital Treatment Levels Affect Survival in Pediatric Trauma Patients.

作者信息

Bläsius Felix Marius, Horst Klemens, Brokmann Jörg Christian, Lefering Rolf, Andruszkow Hagen, Hildebrand Frank

机构信息

Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital RWTH, 52074 Aachen, Germany.

Emergency Department, University Hospital RTWH, 52074 Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 18;10(4):837. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040837.

DOI:10.3390/jcm10040837
PMID:33670679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7922049/
Abstract

(1) Background: Data on the effects of helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) transport and treatment on the survival of severely injured pediatric patients in high-level trauma centers remain unclear. (2) Methods: A national dataset from the TraumaRegister DGU was used to retrospectively compare the mortality rates among severely injured pediatric patients (1-15 years) who were transported by HEMS to those transported by ground emergency medical service (GEMS) and treated at trauma centers of different treatment levels (levels I-III). (3) Results: In total, 2755 pediatric trauma patients (age: 9.0 ± 4.8 years) were included in this study over five years. Transportation by HEMS resulted in a significant survival benefit compared to GEMS (odds ratio (OR) 0.489; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.282-0.850). Pediatric trauma patients treated in level II or III trauma centers showed 34% and fourfold higher in-hospital mortality risk than those in level I trauma centers (level II: OR 1.34, 95% CI: 0.70-2.56; level III: OR 4.63, 95% CI: 1.33-16.09). (4) Conclusions: In our national pediatric trauma cohort, both HEMS transportation and treatment in level I trauma centers were independent factors of improved survival in pediatric trauma patients.

摘要

(1) 背景:关于直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)转运和治疗对高级别创伤中心严重受伤儿科患者生存率影响的数据仍不明确。(2) 方法:使用来自创伤登记数据库DGU的全国数据集,回顾性比较由HEMS转运的严重受伤儿科患者(1至15岁)与由地面紧急医疗服务(GEMS)转运并在不同治疗级别(I至III级)创伤中心接受治疗的患者的死亡率。(3) 结果:在五年期间,本研究共纳入2755例儿科创伤患者(年龄:9.0±4.8岁)。与GEMS相比,HEMS转运带来了显著的生存获益(优势比(OR)0.489;95%置信区间(CI):0.282 - 0.850)。在II级或III级创伤中心接受治疗的儿科创伤患者的院内死亡风险比I级创伤中心的患者分别高34%和四倍(II级:OR 1.34,95% CI:0.70 - 2.56;III级:OR 4.63,95% CI:1.33 - 16.09)。(4) 结论:在我们的全国儿科创伤队列中,HEMS转运和在I级创伤中心治疗都是提高儿科创伤患者生存率的独立因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22d7/7922049/0ec127837b24/jcm-10-00837-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22d7/7922049/0ec127837b24/jcm-10-00837-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22d7/7922049/0ec127837b24/jcm-10-00837-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Helicopter Emergency Medical Service and Hospital Treatment Levels Affect Survival in Pediatric Trauma Patients.直升机紧急医疗服务和医院治疗水平影响小儿创伤患者的生存率。
J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 18;10(4):837. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040837.
2
Ten years of helicopter emergency medical services in Germany: do we still need the helicopter rescue in multiple traumatised patients?德国直升机紧急医疗服务十年:对于多处创伤患者,我们仍需要直升机救援吗?
Injury. 2014 Oct;45 Suppl 3:S53-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.018.
3
Helicopters and injured kids: Improved survival with scene air medical transport in the pediatric trauma population.直升机与受伤儿童:儿科创伤人群通过现场空中医疗转运提高了生存率。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 May;80(5):702-10. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000971.
4
Survival benefit of helicopter emergency medical services compared to ground emergency medical services in traumatized patients.直升机紧急医疗服务与地面紧急医疗服务相比对创伤患者的生存益处。
Crit Care. 2013 Jun 21;17(3):R124. doi: 10.1186/cc12796.
5
Impact of Helicopter Emergency Medical Service in Traumatized Patients: Which Patient Benefits Most?直升机紧急医疗服务对创伤患者的影响:哪些患者获益最大?
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 15;11(1):e0146897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146897. eCollection 2016.
6
Speed is not everything: Identifying patients who may benefit from helicopter transport despite faster ground transport.速度并非一切:确定那些尽管地面转运速度更快但可能从直升机转运中获益的患者。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Apr;84(4):549-557. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001769.
7
Outcomes after helicopter versus ground emergency medical services for major trauma--propensity score and instrumental variable analyses: a retrospective nationwide cohort study.直升机与地面紧急医疗服务用于重大创伤后的结局——倾向评分与工具变量分析:一项全国性回顾性队列研究
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Nov 29;24(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0335-z.
8
Helicopter versus ground emergency medical services for the transportation of traumatically injured children.直升机与地面紧急医疗服务用于创伤性受伤儿童的转运
J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Feb;50(2):347-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.09.040. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
9
Association between physician-staffed helicopter versus ground emergency medical services and mortality for pediatric trauma patients: A retrospective nationwide cohort study.医生配备直升机与地面紧急医疗服务对儿科创伤患者死亡率的影响:一项回顾性全国队列研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 12;15(8):e0237192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237192. eCollection 2020.
10
Helicopter and ground emergency medical services transportation to hospital after major trauma in England: a comparative cohort study.英国重大创伤后直升机和地面紧急医疗服务转运至医院的比较队列研究。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2020 Jul 16;5(1):e000508. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000508. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Medical Helicopter and Ground Medical Crews in Polytrauma Management: An Evaluative Perspective.医疗直升机和地面医护人员在多发伤管理中的作用:评估视角
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2024 Dec 24;15:315-328. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S486167. eCollection 2024.
2
Pediatric intensive care unit admissions network-rationale, framework and method of operation of a nationwide collaborative pediatric intensive care research network in Germany.儿科重症监护病房入院网络——德国全国性协作儿科重症监护研究网络的基本原理、框架及运作方法
Front Pediatr. 2024 Jan 10;11:1254935. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1254935. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of prehospital physician presence on survival after severe trauma: Systematic review and meta-analysis.院前医生到场对严重创伤后存活的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Oct;87(4):978-989. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002444.
2
Differences in survival outcome for severely injured paediatric trauma by type of trauma centre.不同类型创伤中心收治的严重受伤儿童创伤患者的生存结局差异。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2017 Aug;53(8):808-813. doi: 10.1111/jpc.13514. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
3
A pilot study of quality of life in German prehospital emergency care physicians.
Trauma patient transport to hospital using helicopter emergency medical services or road ambulance in Sweden: a comparison of survival and prehospital time intervals.
瑞典使用直升机紧急医疗服务或公路救护车将创伤患者转运至医院:生存和院前时间间隔比较。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 Dec 16;31(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01168-9.
4
Pediatric Trauma and Trauma Team Activation in a Swiss Pediatric Emergency Department: An Observational Cohort Study.瑞士儿科急诊科的儿科创伤与创伤团队启动:一项观察性队列研究
Children (Basel). 2023 Aug 11;10(8):1377. doi: 10.3390/children10081377.
5
Adherence to the transfer recommendations of the German Trauma Society in severely injured children: a retrospective study from the TraumaRegister DGU.严重创伤患儿遵循德国创伤学会转运建议的情况:来自创伤登记处 DGU 的回顾性研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 27;13(1):12152. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39335-8.
6
Factors influencing on-scene time in a physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS): a retrospective observational study.影响医师配备直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)现场时间的因素:一项回顾性观察研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 Apr 14;31(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01085-x.
7
Electrochemical Microneedles: Innovative Instruments in Health Care.电化学微针:医疗保健领域的创新器械。
Biosensors (Basel). 2022 Sep 28;12(10):801. doi: 10.3390/bios12100801.
8
Visualized analysis of research on helicopter emergency medical service.直升机紧急医疗服务研究的可视化分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 9;101(36):e30463. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030463.
9
Tracheal Tube Misplacement after Emergency Intubation in Pediatric Trauma Patients: A Retrospective, Exploratory Study.小儿创伤患者紧急插管后气管导管误置:一项回顾性探索性研究
Children (Basel). 2022 Feb 18;9(2):289. doi: 10.3390/children9020289.
德国院前急救医生生活质量的一项试点研究。
J Res Med Sci. 2016 Dec 26;21:133. doi: 10.4103/1735-1995.196615. eCollection 2016.
4
Comparison of outcomes in severe pediatric trauma at adult trauma centers with different trauma case volumes.不同创伤病例数量的成人创伤中心中重度小儿创伤的结局比较。
J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Nov;52(11):1831-1835. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.01.066. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
5
Current use and outcomes of helicopter transport in pediatric trauma: a review of 18,291 transports.直升机转运在儿童创伤中的当前应用及结局:对18291例转运病例的综述
J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Jan;52(1):140-144. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.10.030. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
6
Advanced airway management in an anaesthesiologist-staffed Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS): A retrospective analysis of 1047 out-of-hospital intubations.由麻醉医生配备的直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)中的高级气道管理:对1047例院外插管的回顾性分析。
Resuscitation. 2016 Aug;105:66-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.04.020. Epub 2016 May 27.
7
Helicopters and injured kids: Improved survival with scene air medical transport in the pediatric trauma population.直升机与受伤儿童:儿科创伤人群通过现场空中医疗转运提高了生存率。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 May;80(5):702-10. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000971.
8
Mortality Among Injured Children Treated at Different Trauma Center Types.不同类型创伤中心治疗的受伤儿童的死亡率。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Sep;150(9):874-81. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1121.
9
[Significance of Helicopter Emergency Medical Service in Prehospital Trauma Care].[直升机紧急医疗服务在院前创伤护理中的意义]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2015 Aug;153(4):387-91. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1545801. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
10
Outcome after resuscitation beyond 30 minutes in drowned children with cardiac arrest and hypothermia: Dutch nationwide retrospective cohort study.心脏骤停和体温过低的溺水儿童复苏超过30分钟后的结局:荷兰全国性回顾性队列研究
BMJ. 2015 Feb 10;350:h418. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h418.