• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年游泳运动员仰泳转蛙泳转身表现:流体动力特征和出水策略。

Backstroke to Breaststroke Turning Performance in Age-Group Swimmers: Hydrodynamic Characteristics and Pull-Out Strategy.

机构信息

Faculty of Sport Science, Burapha University, Chonburi 20131, Thailand.

Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D) and Porto Biomechanics Laboratory (LABIOMEP-UP), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 14;18(4):1858. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041858.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18041858
PMID:33672908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7918682/
Abstract

We compared the hydrodynamic characteristics and pull-out strategies of four backstroke-to-breaststroke turning techniques in young swimmers. Eighteen 11 and 12-year-old swimmers participated in a 4 week intervention program including 16 contextual interference sessions. The hydrodynamic variables were assessed through inverse dynamics, and the pull-out strategy kinematics were assessed with tracking markers followed by 12 land cameras and 11 underwater cameras. Swimmers randomly completed sixteen 30 m maximal backstroke-to breaststroke-open, somersault, bucket and crossover turns (four in each technique) with a 3 min rest. The data showed higher drag force, cross-sectional area and drag coefficient values for the first (compared with the second) gliding position. The crossover turn revealed the highest push-off velocity (2.17 ± 0.05 m·s), and the somersault turn demonstrated the lowest foot plant index (0.68 ± 0.03; 68%), which could have affected the first gliding, transition and second gliding depths (0.73 ± 0.13, 0.86 ± 0.17 and 0.76 ± 0.17 m). The data revealed the consistency of the time spent (4.86 ± 0.98 s) and breakout distance (6.04 ± 0.94 m) among the four turning techniques, and no differences were observed between them regarding time and average velocity up to 7.5 m. The hydrodynamic characteristics and pull-out strategy of the backstroke-to-breaststroke turns performed by the age group swimmers were independent of the selected technique.

摘要

我们比较了四种仰泳转蛙泳转身技术在年轻游泳运动员中的流体力学特征和出水策略。18 名 11 岁和 12 岁的游泳运动员参加了一个为期 4 周的干预计划,包括 16 个情境干扰课程。通过反向动力学评估流体动力学变量,通过跟踪标记评估出水策略运动学,然后使用 12 个陆地摄像机和 11 个水下摄像机。游泳运动员随机完成了 16 次 30 米最大仰泳-蛙泳-开放式、翻滚、桶式和交叉式转身(每种技术各 4 次),每次休息 3 分钟。数据显示,第一次(与第二次相比)滑行位置的阻力、截面积和阻力系数较高。交叉式转身显示出最高的蹬离速度(2.17 ± 0.05 m·s),而翻滚式转身显示出最低的脚植指数(0.68 ± 0.03;68%),这可能影响了第一次滑行、过渡和第二次滑行的深度(0.73 ± 0.13、0.86 ± 0.17 和 0.76 ± 0.17 m)。数据显示,四种转身技术的出水时间(4.86 ± 0.98 s)和出水距离(6.04 ± 0.94 m)保持一致,在出水时间和平均速度达到 7.5 m 之前,四种转身技术之间没有差异。年龄组游泳运动员进行的仰泳转蛙泳转身的流体力学特征和出水策略与所选技术无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/486d/7918682/6f72afe05ec7/ijerph-18-01858-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/486d/7918682/4e0a0cb5953d/ijerph-18-01858-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/486d/7918682/68b543353f37/ijerph-18-01858-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/486d/7918682/6f72afe05ec7/ijerph-18-01858-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/486d/7918682/4e0a0cb5953d/ijerph-18-01858-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/486d/7918682/68b543353f37/ijerph-18-01858-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/486d/7918682/6f72afe05ec7/ijerph-18-01858-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Backstroke to Breaststroke Turning Performance in Age-Group Swimmers: Hydrodynamic Characteristics and Pull-Out Strategy.青少年游泳运动员仰泳转蛙泳转身表现:流体动力特征和出水策略。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 14;18(4):1858. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041858.
2
Biomechanical Features of Backstroke to Breaststroke Transition Techniques in Age-Group Swimmers.年龄组游泳运动员仰泳转蛙泳过渡技术的生物力学特征
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Mar 10;4:802967. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.802967. eCollection 2022.
3
Modeling and predicting the backstroke to breaststroke turns performance in age-group swimmers.建模和预测年龄组游泳运动员的仰泳转蛙泳表现。
Sports Biomech. 2023 Dec;22(12):1700-1721. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2021.2005127. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
4
Determination of the drag coefficient during the first and second gliding positions of the breaststroke underwater stroke.蝶泳水下划水第一和第二滑行位置时阻力系数的测定。
J Appl Biomech. 2010 Aug;26(3):324-31. doi: 10.1123/jab.26.3.324.
5
Backstroke-to-Breaststroke Turns Muscular Activity. A Study Conducted in Age Group Swimmers.仰泳转蛙泳的肌肉活动。一项针对年龄组游泳运动员的研究。
J Sports Sci Med. 2022 Sep 1;21(3):402-412. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2022.402. eCollection 2022 Sep.
6
Understanding the effects of training on underwater undulatory swimming performance and kinematics.了解训练对水下波动游泳性能和运动学的影响。
Sports Biomech. 2024 Jun;23(6):772-787. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2021.1891276. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
7
Pacing in World-Class Age Group Swimmers in 100 and 200 m Freestyle, Backstroke, Breaststroke, and Butterfly.世界级年龄组游泳运动员 100 米和 200 米自由泳、仰泳、蛙泳和蝶泳的配速。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 30;17(11):3875. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113875.
8
Computational fluid dynamics vs. inverse dynamics methods to determine passive drag in two breaststroke glide positions.计算流体动力学与逆动力学方法用于确定两种蛙泳滑行姿势下的被动阻力
J Biomech. 2015 Jul 16;48(10):2221-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 May 9.
9
Kinematical Comparison of the 200 m Backstroke Turns between National and Regional Level Swimmers.全国和地区级游泳运动员 200 米仰泳转身的运动学比较。
J Sports Sci Med. 2013 Dec 1;12(4):730-7. eCollection 2013.
10
Effect of the starting and turning performances on the subsequent swimming parameters of elite swimmers.出发和转身表现对优秀游泳运动员后续游泳参数的影响。
Sports Biomech. 2017 Mar;16(1):34-44. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2016.1179782. Epub 2016 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of the fastest backstroke age group swimmers competing in the World Masters Championships 1986-2024.分析 1986-2024 年世界大师锦标赛中最快的仰泳年龄组游泳运动员。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 26;14(1):17214. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68222-z.
2
Differences in Race Characteristics between World-Class Individual-Medley and Stroke-Specialist Swimmers.世界级个人混合泳和短距离自由泳选手的种族特征差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 20;19(20):13578. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013578.
3
Kinematic Analysis of the Underwater Undulatory Swimming Cycle: A Systematic and Synthetic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
A Biophysical Analysis on the Arm Stroke Efficiency in Front Crawl Swimming: Comparing Methods and Determining the Main Performance Predictors.关于自由泳划臂效率的生物力学分析:方法比较与主要性能预测指标的确定。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 26;16(23):4715. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234715.
2
Modulation of upper limb joint work and power during sculling while ballasted with varying loads.在使用不同负荷进行压载划桨时上肢关节功和功率的调节。
J Exp Biol. 2017 May 1;220(Pt 9):1729-1736. doi: 10.1242/jeb.154781. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
3
Upper limb joint forces and moments during underwater cyclical movements.
水下波动游泳周期的运动学分析:系统综合综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 26;19(19):12196. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912196.
4
Backstroke-to-Breaststroke Turns Muscular Activity. A Study Conducted in Age Group Swimmers.仰泳转蛙泳的肌肉活动。一项针对年龄组游泳运动员的研究。
J Sports Sci Med. 2022 Sep 1;21(3):402-412. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2022.402. eCollection 2022 Sep.
5
Biomechanical Features of Backstroke to Breaststroke Transition Techniques in Age-Group Swimmers.年龄组游泳运动员仰泳转蛙泳过渡技术的生物力学特征
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Mar 10;4:802967. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.802967. eCollection 2022.
水下周期性运动过程中的上肢关节力和力矩。
J Biomech. 2016 Oct 3;49(14):3355-3361. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.08.027. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
4
Computational fluid dynamics vs. inverse dynamics methods to determine passive drag in two breaststroke glide positions.计算流体动力学与逆动力学方法用于确定两种蛙泳滑行姿势下的被动阻力
J Biomech. 2015 Jul 16;48(10):2221-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 May 9.
5
Kinematic, kinetic and EMG analysis of four front crawl flip turn techniques.四种自由泳转身技术的运动学、动力学和肌电图分析。
J Sports Sci. 2015;33(19):2006-15. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1026374. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
6
The Effect of Depth on Drag During the Streamlined Glide: A Three-Dimensional CFD Analysis.在流线型滑翔中深度对阻力的影响:三维 CFD 分析。
J Hum Kinet. 2012 Jun;33:55-62. doi: 10.2478/v10078-012-0044-2. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
7
Determination of the drag coefficient during the first and second gliding positions of the breaststroke underwater stroke.蝶泳水下划水第一和第二滑行位置时阻力系数的测定。
J Appl Biomech. 2010 Aug;26(3):324-31. doi: 10.1123/jab.26.3.324.
8
Analysis of the lateral push-off in the freestyle flip turn.自由泳转身后的侧向踢水动作分析。
J Sports Sci. 2010 Sep;28(11):1175-81. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2010.485207.
9
Hydrodynamic glide efficiency in swimming.游泳的水动力滑行效率。
J Sci Med Sport. 2010 Jul;13(4):444-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2009.04.009. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
10
Active and passive drag: the role of trunk incline.主动和被动阻力:躯干倾斜的作用。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009 May;106(2):195-205. doi: 10.1007/s00421-009-1007-8. Epub 2009 Feb 18.