Bernardo Noemia Liege Maria da Cunha, Soares Luciano, Leite Silvana Nair
School of Health Sciences, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, PPGFAR Universidade do Vale do Itajaí, Itajaí 88300000, Brazil.
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88040000, Brazil.
Pharmacy (Basel). 2021 Feb 12;9(1):39. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9010039.
The decentralization of the Brazilian health system required that municipalities took responsibility for the local Pharmaceutical Policy and Services (PPS) system. This article presents and analyses an innovative experience of diagnosis of municipal PPS as a sociotechnical system. We adopted a multi-methods approach and various data sources. Sociotechnical theory was the framework of the methodology of evaluation and design of systems, analyzing the External System (health system, stakeholders, financing) and Internal System (goals, management, workforce, infrastructure, processes, technology and culture). The "objective" component of the PPS system was identified as the central element. The lack of a unified objective and of a central coordination and unmanaged pharmaceutical services prevented integrated internal planning and planning with other sectors. Stakeholders and documents referred only to technical elements of the system: Infrastructure, technical process, and technology. The social components of the workforce and culture were not mentioned. The organizational culture established was the culture of isolation: "Each one does his own". The pharmacists working in the municipal health system did not know each other. There was no integration strategy between pharmacists and their work processes. Consequently, the municipal PPS had limited scope as a public policy. It had constrained the characteristics of PPS as a complex and open system. Understanding the municipal PPS as a sociotechnical system can push the development of a new level of policy and practice to ensure the population's right to the access to and rational use of medicines.
巴西卫生系统的分权要求各市负责当地的药品政策与服务(PPS)体系。本文介绍并分析了将市级PPS诊断为社会技术系统的创新经验。我们采用了多方法途径和各种数据来源。社会技术理论是系统评估与设计方法的框架,分析外部系统(卫生系统、利益相关者、融资)和内部系统(目标、管理、劳动力、基础设施、流程、技术和文化)。PPS系统的“客观”组成部分被确定为核心要素。缺乏统一目标以及中央协调和无管理的药品服务阻碍了内部综合规划以及与其他部门的规划。利益相关者和文件仅提及系统的技术要素:基础设施、技术流程和技术。劳动力和文化的社会组成部分未被提及。所建立的组织文化是孤立文化:“各人自扫门前雪”。在市卫生系统工作的药剂师互不相识。药剂师与其工作流程之间没有整合策略。因此,市级PPS作为一项公共政策的作用有限。它限制了PPS作为一个复杂且开放系统的特性。将市级PPS理解为社会技术系统可以推动政策和实践发展到新的水平,以确保民众获得药品并合理用药的权利。