• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

犹他州死产相关风险研究(SOARS)的设计与方法学。

Design and Methodology of the Study of Associated Risks of Stillbirth (SOARS) in Utah.

机构信息

Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chamblee, GA, USA.

Bureau of Maternal and Child Health, Utah Department of Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Rep. 2022 Jan-Feb;137(1):87-93. doi: 10.1177/0033354921994895. Epub 2021 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1177/0033354921994895
PMID:33673777
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8721751/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Utah Study of Associated Risks of Stillbirth (SOARS) collects data about stillbirths that are not included in medical records or on fetal death certificates. We describe the design, methods, and survey response rate from the first year of SOARS.

METHODS

The Utah Department of Health identified all Utah women who experienced a stillbirth from June 1, 2018, through May 31, 2019, via fetal death certificates and invited them to participate in SOARS. The research team based the study protocol on the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System surveillance of women with live births and modified it to be sensitive to women's recent experience of a stillbirth. We used fetal death certificates to examine survey response rates overall and by maternal characteristics, gestational age of the fetus, and month in which the loss occurred.

RESULTS

Of 288 women invited to participate in the study, 167 (58.0%) completed the survey; 149 (89.2%) responded by mail and 18 (10.8%) by telephone. A higher proportion of women who were non-Hispanic White (vs other races/ethnicities), were married (vs unmarried), and had ≥high school education (vs <high school education) responded to the survey. Differences between responders and nonresponders by maternal age, gestational age of the fetus, or month of delivery were not significant. Among responders, item nonresponse rates were low (range, 0.6%-5.4%). The question about income (4.8%) and the questions about tests offered and performed during the hospital stay had the highest item nonresponse rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The response rate suggests that a mail- and telephone-based survey can be successful in collecting self-reported information about risk factors for stillbirths not currently included in medical records or fetal death certificates.

摘要

目的

犹他州出生后相关风险研究(SOARS)收集了未包含在病历或胎儿死亡证明中的死胎数据。我们描述了 SOARS 第一年的设计、方法和调查响应率。

方法

犹他州卫生部通过胎儿死亡证明确定了 2018 年 6 月 1 日至 2019 年 5 月 31 日期间所有经历死胎的犹他州女性,并邀请她们参加 SOARS。研究小组以活产妇女妊娠风险评估监测系统监测为基础制定研究方案,并对其进行了修改,使其对女性近期死胎经历更为敏感。我们使用胎儿死亡证明检查了总体和按产妇特征、胎儿胎龄以及死亡发生月份的调查响应率。

结果

在 288 名受邀参与研究的女性中,167 名(58.0%)完成了调查;149 名(89.2%)通过邮件回复,18 名(10.8%)通过电话回复。与其他种族/民族相比,非西班牙裔白人(vs. 其他种族/民族)、已婚(vs. 未婚)和具有≥高中学历(vs. <高中学历)的女性更有可能回复调查。产妇年龄、胎儿胎龄或分娩月份的应答者与非应答者之间没有显著差异。在应答者中,项目无应答率较低(范围为 0.6%-5.4%)。关于收入的问题(4.8%)和关于住院期间提供和进行的检查的问题具有最高的项目无应答率。

结论

响应率表明,基于邮件和电话的调查可以成功收集目前未包含在病历或胎儿死亡证明中的死产风险因素的自我报告信息。

相似文献

1
Design and Methodology of the Study of Associated Risks of Stillbirth (SOARS) in Utah.犹他州死产相关风险研究(SOARS)的设计与方法学。
Public Health Rep. 2022 Jan-Feb;137(1):87-93. doi: 10.1177/0033354921994895. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
2
Improving surveillance for the hidden half of fetal-infant mortality: a pilot study of the expansion of the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System to include stillbirth.加强对胎儿和婴儿隐性死亡的监测:将妊娠风险评估监测系统扩展至纳入死产的试点研究
Ann Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;26(6):401-4. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.03.012. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
3
Levels, Trends, and Risk Factors for Stillbirths in the United States: 2000-2017.美国 2000-2017 年死产率的水平、趋势和危险因素。
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e601-e611. doi: 10.1055/a-1925-2131. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
4
Factors Associated with Stillbirth Autopsy in Georgia and Utah, 2010-2014: The Importance of Delivery Location.2010-2014 年佐治亚州和犹他州死产尸检相关因素:分娩地点的重要性。
Am J Perinatol. 2018 Nov;35(13):1271-1280. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1648234. Epub 2018 May 3.
5
Sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics of stillbirths in China: a census of nearly 4 million health facility births between 2012 and 2014.中国死产的社会人口学和产科特征:2012 年至 2014 年近 400 万例医疗机构分娩的普查。
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Feb;4(2):e109-18. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00271-5. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
6
Fetal death certificate data quality: a tale of two U.S. counties.胎儿死亡证明数据质量:美国两个县的故事
Ann Epidemiol. 2017 Aug;27(8):466-471.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
7
Use of active surveillance methodologies to examine over-reporting of stillbirths on fetal death certificates.使用主动监测方法来检查胎儿死亡证明上死产报告的过度报告情况。
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2011 Dec;91(12):1004-10. doi: 10.1002/bdra.22856. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
8
Postpartum readmission risk: a comparison between stillbirths and live births.产后再入院风险:死胎与活产的比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Oct;231(4):463.e1-463.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.02.017. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
9
Using routine data to examine factors associated with stillbirth in three tertiary maternity facilities in Kabul, Afghanistan.利用常规数据研究阿富汗喀布尔三家三级产科机构中与死产相关的因素。
Reprod Health. 2025 Jan 3;22(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01916-9.
10
Fetal growth and risk of stillbirth: a population-based case-control study.胎儿生长与死产风险:基于人群的病例对照研究。
PLoS Med. 2014 Apr 22;11(4):e1001633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001633. eCollection 2014 Apr.

引用本文的文献

1
Participation in survey research among mothers with a recent live birth: A comparison of mothers with living versus deceased infants - Findings from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 2016-2019.有近期活产的母亲参与调查研究:比较有存活与死亡婴儿的母亲 - 来自 2016-2019 年妊娠风险评估监测系统的结果。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2022 Nov;36(6):827-838. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12875. Epub 2022 Apr 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Cause-of-death Data From the Fetal Death File, 2015-2017.2015 - 2017年胎儿死亡档案中的死因数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2020 Apr;69(4):1-20.
2
Obstetric Care Consensus #10: Management of Stillbirth: (Replaces Practice Bulletin Number 102, March 2009).产科护理共识第10号:死产的管理(取代2009年3月发布的第102号实践公告)
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;222(3):B2-B20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.017. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
3
The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): Overview of Design and Methodology.妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS):设计与方法概述。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Oct;108(10):1305-1313. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304563. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
4
Fetal death certificate data quality: a tale of two U.S. counties.胎儿死亡证明数据质量:美国两个县的故事
Ann Epidemiol. 2017 Aug;27(8):466-471.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
5
Improving surveillance for the hidden half of fetal-infant mortality: a pilot study of the expansion of the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System to include stillbirth.加强对胎儿和婴儿隐性死亡的监测:将妊娠风险评估监测系统扩展至纳入死产的试点研究
Ann Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;26(6):401-4. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.03.012. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
6
Stillbirths: economic and psychosocial consequences.死产:经济和心理社会后果。
Lancet. 2016 Feb 6;387(10018):604-616. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00836-3. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
7
Implications for Improving Fetal Death Vital Statistics: Connecting Reporters' Self-Identified Practices and Barriers to Third Trimester Fetal Death Data Quality in New York City.改善死胎生命统计数据的意义:将报告者自我认定的做法及障碍与纽约市孕晚期死胎数据质量相联系
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Feb;20(2):337-46. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1833-8.
8
The association of stillbirth with depressive symptoms 6-36 months post-delivery.死产与产后6至36个月抑郁症状的关联。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2015 Mar;29(2):131-43. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12176. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
9
Using an existing birth defects surveillance program to enhance surveillance data on stillbirths.利用现有的出生缺陷监测项目加强死产监测数据。
J Registry Manag. 2014 Spring;41(1):13-8.
10
Understanding perinatal death: a systematic analysis of New York City fetal and neonatal death vital record data and implications for improvement, 2007-2011.理解围产期死亡:对2007 - 2011年纽约市胎儿和新生儿死亡生命记录数据的系统分析及改进建议
Matern Child Health J. 2014 Oct;18(8):1945-54. doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1440-0.