Ma Xinran, Bellomo Lawrence, Magee Kelly, Bennette Caroline S, Tymejczyk Olga, Samant Meghna, Tucker Melisa, Nussbaum Nathan, Bowser Bryan E, Kraut Joshua S, Bourla Ariel Bulua
Flatiron Health, Inc, New York, NY, USA.
New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Adv Ther. 2021 Apr;38(4):1843-1859. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01659-0. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
Effectiveness metrics for real-word research, analogous to clinical trial ones, are needed. This study aimed to develop a real-world response (rwR) variable applicable to solid tumors and to evaluate its clinical relevance and meaningfulness.
This retrospective study used patient cohorts with advanced non-small cell lung cancer from a nationwide, de-identified electronic health record (EHR)-derived database. Disease burden information abstracted manually was classified into response categories anchored to discrete therapy lines (per patient-line). In part 1, we quantified the feasibility and reliability of data capture, and estimated the association between rwR status and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and real-world overall survival (rwOS). In part 2, we investigated the correlation between published clinical trial overall response rates (ORRs) and real-world response rates (rwRRs) from corresponding real-world patient cohorts.
In part 1, 85.4% of patients (N = 3248) had at least one radiographic assessment documented. Median abstraction time per patient-line was 15.0 min (IQR 7.8-28.1). Inter-abstractor agreement on presence/absence of at least one assessment was 0.94 (95% CI 0.92-0.96; n = 503 patient-lines abstracted in duplicate); inter-abstractor agreement on best confirmed response category was 0.82 (95% CI 0.78-0.86; n = 384 with at least one captured assessment). Confirmed responders at a 3-month landmark showed significantly lower risk of death and progression in rwOS and rwPFS analyses across all line settings. In part 2, rwRRs (from 12 rw cohorts) showed a high correlation with trial ORRs (Spearman's ρ = 0.99).
We developed a rwR variable generated from clinician assessments documented in EHRs following radiographic evaluations. This variable provides clinically meaningful information and may provide a real-world measure of treatment effectiveness.
需要类似于临床试验的真实世界研究有效性指标。本研究旨在开发一种适用于实体瘤的真实世界反应(rwR)变量,并评估其临床相关性和意义。
这项回顾性研究使用了来自全国范围、经过去识别处理的电子健康记录(EHR)数据库中的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者队列。手动提取的疾病负担信息被分类到基于离散治疗线(每位患者的治疗线)的反应类别中。在第1部分,我们量化了数据采集的可行性和可靠性,并估计了rwR状态与真实世界无进展生存期(rwPFS)和真实世界总生存期(rwOS)之间的关联。在第2部分,我们研究了已发表的临床试验总缓解率(ORR)与相应真实世界患者队列的真实世界缓解率(rwRR)之间的相关性。
在第1部分,85.4%的患者(N = 3248)有至少一次影像学评估记录。每位患者治疗线的中位提取时间为15.0分钟(IQR 7.8 - 28.1)。关于是否存在至少一次评估的提取者间一致性为0.94(95%CI 0.92 - 0.96;n = 503条患者治疗线进行了重复提取);关于最佳确认反应类别的提取者间一致性为0.82(95%CI 0.78 - 0.86;n = 384例有至少一次捕获评估)。在3个月时间点的确认缓解者在所有治疗线设置的rwOS和rwPFS分析中显示出显著更低的死亡和进展风险。在第2部分,rwRRs(来自12个rw队列)与试验ORR显示出高度相关性(Spearman's ρ = 0.99)。
我们开发了一种rwR变量,它由影像学评估后EHR中记录的临床医生评估生成。该变量提供了具有临床意义的信息,并可能提供治疗有效性的真实世界衡量指标。