Suppr超能文献

急诊科虚弱干预(EDIFY):前门老年护理可减少急性入院。

Emergency Department Interventions for Frailty (EDIFY): Front-Door Geriatric Care Can Reduce Acute Admissions.

机构信息

Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital (TTSH), Singapore; Institute of Geriatrics and Active Ageing (IGA), TTSH, Singapore.

Department of Nursing Services, TTSH, Singapore.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Apr;22(4):923-928.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.01.083. Epub 2021 Mar 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The EDIFY program was developed to deliver early geriatric specialist interventions at the emergency department (ED) to reduce the number of acute admissions by identifying patients for safe discharge or transfer to low-acuity care settings. We evaluated the effectiveness of EDIFY in reducing potentially avoidable acute admissions.

DESIGN

A quasi-experimental study.

SETTING

ED of a 1700-bed tertiary hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

ED patients aged ≥85 years.

MEASUREMENTS

We compared EDIFY interventions versus standard care. Patients with plans for acute admission were screened and recruited. Data on demographics, premorbid function, frailty status, comorbidities, and acute illness severity were gathered. We examined the primary outcome of "successful acute admission avoidance" among the intervention group, which was defined as no ED attendance within 72 hours of discharge from ED, no transfer to an acute ward from subacute-care units (SCU) within 72-hours, or no transfer to an acute ward from the short-stay unit (SSU). Secondary outcomes were rehospitalization, ED re-attendance, institutionalization, functional decline, mortality, and frailty transitions at 1, 3, and 6 months.

RESULTS

We recruited 100 participants (mean age 90.0 ± 4.1 years, 66.0% women). There were no differences in baseline characteristics between intervention (n = 43) and nonintervention (n = 57) groups. Thirty-five (81.4%) participants in the intervention group successfully avoided an acute admission (20.9% home, 23.3% SCU, and 44.2% SSU). All participants in the nonintervention group were hospitalized. There were no differences in rehospitalization, ED re-attendance, institutionalization and mortality over the study period. Additionally, we observed a higher rate of progression to a poorer frailty category at all time points among the nonintervention group (1, 3, and 6 months: all P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Results from our single-center study suggest that early geriatric specialist interventions at the ED can reduce potentially avoidable acute admissions without escalating the risk of rehospitalization, ED re-attendance, or mortality, and with possible benefit in attenuating frailty progression.

摘要

目的

EDIFY 计划在急诊科提供早期老年专科干预,通过识别适合安全出院或转移到低强度护理环境的患者,减少急性入院人数。我们评估了 EDIFY 在减少潜在可避免的急性入院方面的有效性。

设计

准实验研究。

设置

1700 床位三级医院的急诊科。

参与者

年龄≥85 岁的急诊科患者。

测量

我们比较了 EDIFY 干预与标准护理。对有急性入院计划的患者进行筛查和招募。收集人口统计学、发病前功能、虚弱状态、合并症和急性疾病严重程度的数据。我们检查了干预组的主要结果“成功避免急性入院”,定义为从急诊科出院后 72 小时内无急诊科就诊、从亚急性护理病房(SCU)转至急性病房 72 小时内无转科、或从短期留观病房(SSU)转至急性病房。次要结果是再住院、急诊科再就诊、住院、功能下降、死亡率和 1、3 和 6 个月时的虚弱状态转变。

结果

我们招募了 100 名参与者(平均年龄 90.0±4.1 岁,66.0%为女性)。干预组(n=43)和非干预组(n=57)之间的基线特征无差异。干预组 35 名(81.4%)患者成功避免了急性入院(20.9%居家、23.3% SCU、44.2% SSU)。非干预组所有患者均住院治疗。在研究期间,再住院、急诊科再就诊、住院和死亡率均无差异。此外,我们观察到非干预组在所有时间点向更差的虚弱状态分类进展的比例更高(1、3 和 6 个月:均 P<0.05)。

结论和意义

我们的单中心研究结果表明,急诊科的早期老年专科干预可以减少潜在可避免的急性入院,而不会增加再住院、急诊科再就诊或死亡率的风险,并可能有助于减缓虚弱状态的进展。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验