School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Clin Interv Aging. 2024 Feb 7;19:189-201. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S434641. eCollection 2024.
This study aimed to explore the process, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes of older adults who received an interdisciplinary Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in the emergency department (ED) over a six-month period after their initial ED attendance.
A prospective cohort study recruited older adults aged ≥65 years who presented to the ED of a university teaching hospital in Ireland. Baseline assessment data comprising a battery of demographic variables and validated indices were obtained at the index ED attendance. Telephone interviews were completed with participants at 30- and 180-day follow-up. The primary outcome was incidence of hospital admission following the index ED attendance. Secondary outcomes included participant satisfaction, incidence of functional decline, health-related quality of life, incidence of unscheduled ED re-attendance(s), hospital (re)admission(s), nursing home admission, and death.
A total of 133 participants (mean age 82.43 years, standard deviation = 6.89 years; 71.4% female) were recruited; 21.8% of the cohort were admitted to hospital following the index ED attendance with a significant decline in function reported at hospital discharge (Z = 2.97, = 0.003). Incidence of 30- and 180-day unscheduled ED re-attendance was 10.5% and 24.8%, respectively. The outcome at the index ED attendance was a significant predictor of adverse outcomes whereby those who were discharged home had significantly lower odds of multiple adverse process outcomes at 30- and 180-day follow-up, and significantly higher function and health-related quality of life at 30-day follow-up.
While this study was observational in nature, findings suggest CGA in the ED may improve outcomes by mitigating against the adverse effects of potentially avoidable hospital admissions and focusing on a longitudinal approach to healthcare delivery at the primary-secondary care interface. Future research should be underpinned by an experimental study design to address key limitations in this study.
本研究旨在探讨在初始急诊科就诊后 6 个月内,接受跨学科综合老年评估(CGA)的老年患者的治疗过程、临床和患者报告结局。
前瞻性队列研究招募了年龄≥65 岁的老年人,他们在爱尔兰一所大学教学医院的急诊科就诊。在急诊科就诊时,收集了包括一系列人口统计学变量和经过验证的指数在内的基线评估数据。在 30 天和 180 天的随访中,通过电话采访完成了对参与者的调查。主要结局是在急诊科就诊后发生住院的发生率。次要结局包括患者满意度、功能下降发生率、健康相关生活质量、未计划的急诊科再就诊发生率、医院(再)入院率、养老院入院率和死亡率。
共招募了 133 名参与者(平均年龄 82.43 岁,标准差=6.89 岁;71.4%为女性);21.8%的患者在急诊科就诊后住院,出院时功能明显下降(Z=2.97,=0.003)。30 天和 180 天的未计划急诊科再就诊发生率分别为 10.5%和 24.8%。急诊科就诊的结局是不良结局的显著预测因素,与出院回家的患者相比,在 30 天和 180 天随访时,有更多不良过程结局的患者比例显著降低,而 30 天随访时的功能和健康相关生活质量显著提高。
虽然本研究是观察性的,但研究结果表明,急诊科的 CGA 可以通过减轻潜在可避免的住院治疗的不利影响并专注于初级保健-二级保健接口的纵向医疗服务方法,从而改善结局。未来的研究应基于实验研究设计,以解决本研究中的关键限制。