• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科虚弱干预(EDIFY):通过多组分虚弱干预改善急诊科老年人的功能结局。

Emergency department interventions for frailty (EDIFY): improving functional outcomes in older persons at the emergency department through a multicomponent frailty intervention.

机构信息

Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital (TTSH), Singapore.

Institute of Geriatrics and Active Ageing (IGA), TTSH, Singapore.

出版信息

Age Ageing. 2022 Feb 2;51(2). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afab251.

DOI:10.1093/ageing/afab251
PMID:35134848
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

emergency department interventions for frailty (EDIFY) delivers frailty-centric interventions at the emergency department (ED). We evaluated the effectiveness of a multicomponent frailty intervention (MFI) in improving functional outcomes among older persons.

DESIGN

a quasi-experimental study.

SETTING

a 30-bed ED observation unit within a 1,700-bed acute tertiary hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

patients aged ≥65 years, categorised as Clinical Frailty Scale 4-6, and planned for discharge from the unit.

METHODS

we compared patients receiving the MFI versus usual-care. Data on demographics, function, frailty, sarcopenia, comorbidities and medications were gathered. Our primary outcome was functional status-Modified Barthel Index (MBI) and Lawton's iADL. Secondary outcomes include hospitalisation, ED re-attendance, mortality, frailty, sarcopenia, polypharmacy and falls. Follow-up assessments were at 3, 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

we recruited 140 participants (mean age 79.7 ± 7.6 years; 47% frail and 73.6% completed the study). Baseline characteristics between groups were comparable (each n = 70). For the intervention group, MBI scores were significantly higher at 6 months (mean: 94.5 ± 11.2 versus 88.5 ± 19.5, P = 0.04), whereas Lawton's iADL scores experienced less decline (change-in-score: 0.0 ± 1.7 versus -1.1 ± 1.8, P = 0.001). Model-based analyses revealed greater odds of maintaining/improving MBI in the intervention group at 6 months [odds ratio (OR) 2.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-6.03, P = 0.04] and 12 months (OR 2.98, 95% CI 1.18-7.54, P = 0.02). This was similar for Lawton's iADL at 12 months (OR 4.01, 95% CI 1.70-9.48, P = 0.002). ED re-attendances (rate ratio 0.35, 95% CI 0.13-0.90, P = 0.03) and progression to sarcopenia (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.94, P = 0.04) were also lower at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

the MFI delivered to older persons at the ED can possibly improve functional outcomes and reduce ED re-attendances while attenuating sarcopenia progression.

摘要

目的

急诊科虚弱干预(EDIFY)在急诊科提供以虚弱为中心的干预措施。我们评估了一种多成分虚弱干预(MFI)在改善老年人功能结局方面的有效性。

设计

准实验研究。

地点

一家 1700 张床位的急性三级医院的 30 张床位急诊科观察单元。

参与者

年龄≥65 岁、临床虚弱量表 4-6 分、计划从单元出院的患者。

方法

我们比较了接受 MFI 与常规护理的患者。收集了人口统计学、功能、虚弱、肌少症、合并症和药物的数据。我们的主要结局是功能状态-改良巴氏量表(MBI)和劳顿的 iADL。次要结局包括住院、急诊科再就诊、死亡率、虚弱、肌少症、多药和跌倒。随访评估在 3、6 和 12 个月进行。

结果

我们招募了 140 名参与者(平均年龄 79.7±7.6 岁;47%虚弱,73.6%完成了研究)。组间基线特征相当(每组 n=70)。对于干预组,6 个月时 MBI 评分明显更高(平均:94.5±11.2 与 88.5±19.5,P=0.04),而劳顿的 iADL 评分下降较少(评分变化:0.0±1.7 与-1.1±1.8,P=0.001)。基于模型的分析显示,干预组在 6 个月时维持/改善 MBI 的可能性更大[优势比(OR)2.51,95%置信区间(CI)1.04-6.03,P=0.04]和 12 个月时(OR 2.98,95%CI 1.18-7.54,P=0.02)。12 个月时劳顿的 iADL 也类似(OR 4.01,95%CI 1.70-9.48,P=0.002)。6 个月时急诊科再就诊(率比 0.35,95%CI 0.13-0.90,P=0.03)和进展为肌少症(OR 0.19,95%CI 0.04-0.94,P=0.04)的发生率也较低。

结论

在急诊科为老年人提供的 MFI 可能可以改善功能结局,减少急诊科再就诊次数,同时减缓肌少症的进展。

相似文献

1
Emergency department interventions for frailty (EDIFY): improving functional outcomes in older persons at the emergency department through a multicomponent frailty intervention.急诊科虚弱干预(EDIFY):通过多组分虚弱干预改善急诊科老年人的功能结局。
Age Ageing. 2022 Feb 2;51(2). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afab251.
2
Emergency Department Interventions for Frailty (EDIFY): Front-Door Geriatric Care Can Reduce Acute Admissions.急诊科虚弱干预(EDIFY):前门老年护理可减少急性入院。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Apr;22(4):923-928.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.01.083. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
3
SARC-F at the Emergency Department: Diagnostic Performance for Frailty and Predictive Performance for Reattendances and Acute Hospitalizations.急诊科的SARC-F:用于评估衰弱的诊断效能以及预测再次就诊和急性住院的预测效能。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(9):1084-1089. doi: 10.1007/s12603-021-1676-5.
4
Evaluating Quality-of-Life, Length of Stay and Cost-Effectiveness of a Front-Door Geriatrics Program: An Exploratory Proof-of-Concept Study.评估老年病学前门方案的生活质量、住院时间和成本效益:探索性概念验证研究。
J Frailty Aging. 2023;12(3):214-220. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2022.40.
5
The impact of frailty Screening of Older adults with muLtidisciplinary assessment of those At Risk during emergency hospital attendance on the quality, safety and cost-effectiveness of care (SOLAR): a randomised controlled trial.多学科评估风险老年人的虚弱筛查对急诊就诊期间护理质量、安全性和成本效益的影响(SOLAR):一项随机对照试验。
Trials. 2021 Aug 31;22(1):581. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05525-w.
6
Systematic geriatric assessment for older patients with frailty in the emergency department: a randomised controlled trial.急诊科衰弱老年患者的系统老年评估:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jul 2;21(1):408. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02351-2.
7
A multicomponent frailty intervention for socioeconomically vulnerable older adults: a designed-delay study.多组分虚弱干预措施用于社会经济脆弱的老年人:一项设计延迟研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2018 Sep 19;13:1799-1814. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S177018. eCollection 2018.
8
Functional Dependency as a Marker for Positive SARC-F Screen among Older Persons at the Emergency Department.功能依赖作为急诊科老年患者SARC-F筛查阳性的标志物
Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2024 Dec;28(4):401-409. doi: 10.4235/agmr.24.0091. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
9
Screening for Frailty and Sarcopenia Among Older Persons in Medical Outpatient Clinics and its Associations With Healthcare Burden.在医疗门诊中筛查老年人虚弱和肌少症及其与医疗负担的关系。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jul 1;18(7):583-587. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
10
Impact of MidMed, a general practitioner-led modified comprehensive geriatric assessment for patients with frailty.中医疗法对衰弱患者的影响,一种由全科医生主导的改良全面老年评估。
Age Ageing. 2023 Mar 1;52(3). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad006.

引用本文的文献

1
Can laboratory test-based frailty indices contribute to frailty screening in emergency departments?基于实验室检测的衰弱指数能否有助于急诊科的衰弱筛查?
Age Ageing. 2025 Jul 1;54(7). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf192.
2
Perspectives on Frailty Among Emergency Physicians: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.急诊医生对衰弱的看法:一项定性描述性研究。
Cureus. 2024 Dec 13;16(12):e75670. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75670. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
The Association Between Frailty Evaluated by Clinical Frailty Scale and Mortality of Older Patients in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Cohort Study.
临床虚弱量表评估的虚弱与急诊科老年患者死亡率的相关性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2024 Jul 25;19:1383-1392. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S472991. eCollection 2024.
4
Functional Dependency as a Marker for Positive SARC-F Screen among Older Persons at the Emergency Department.功能依赖作为急诊科老年患者SARC-F筛查阳性的标志物
Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2024 Dec;28(4):401-409. doi: 10.4235/agmr.24.0091. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
5
Strategies to improve care for older adults who present to the emergency department: a systematic review.改善老年急诊患者护理的策略:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 8;24(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10576-1.