Natelson B H, Ottenweller J E, Pitman D, Tapp W N
Primate Neuro-behavioral Unit, VA Medical Center, East Orange, NJ.
Life Sci. 1988;42(17):1597-602. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(88)90438-9.
On an every other day basis, chronically catheterized male rats were subjected to a 30 sec grid shock in either an ascending (0.0, 0.25, 1.0, 4.0 mA) or descending order. A third group was repeatedly subjected to 1.0 mA shock over the same time frame. In 85% of the shock trials, plasma prolactin increased from baseline levels, thus indicating that prolactin is a relatively reliable index of stress. However prolactin did not change in a step-wise fashion with stressor intensity for a significant number of rats. Data from the group given repeated exposure to the 1 mA stressor showed no evidence of habituation--a process which might have explained the findings. This study indicates that prolactin levels do not sensitively track stressor intensity for individual rats.
每隔一天,长期插有导管的雄性大鼠会接受30秒的格栅电击,电击强度按升序(0.0、0.25、1.0、4.0毫安)或降序进行。第三组大鼠在相同时间段内反复接受1.0毫安的电击。在85%的电击试验中,血浆催乳素水平从基线水平升高,这表明催乳素是应激的一个相对可靠指标。然而,对于相当数量的大鼠来说,催乳素水平并未随应激源强度呈逐步变化。反复暴露于1毫安应激源组的数据未显示出习惯化的迹象——而习惯化过程本可解释这些研究结果。这项研究表明,催乳素水平并不能灵敏地追踪个体大鼠的应激源强度。