A Longitudinal Comparison of Alternatives to Body Mass Index Z-Scores for Children with Very High Body Mass Indexes.

OBJECTIVE

The current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) body mass index (BMI) z-scores are inaccurate for BMIs of ≥97th percentile. We, therefore, considered 5 alternatives that can be used across the entire BMI distribution: modified BMI-for-age z-score (BMIz), BMI expressed as a percentage of the 95th percentile (%CDC95th percentile), extended BMIz, BMI expressed as a percentage of the median (%median), and %median adjusted for the dispersion of BMIs.

STUDY DESIGN

We illustrate the behavior of the metrics among children of different ages and BMIs. We then compared the longitudinal tracking of the BMI metrics in electronic health record data from 1.17 million children in PEDSnet using the intraclass correlation coefficient to determine if 1 metric was superior.

RESULTS

Our examples show that using CDC BMIz for high BMIs can result in nonsensical results. All alternative metrics showed higher tracking than CDC BMIz among children with obesity. Of the alternatives, modified BMIz performed poorly among children with severe obesity, and %median performed poorly among children who did not have obesity at their first visit. The highest intraclass correlation coefficients were generally seen for extended BMIz, adjusted %median, and %CDC95th percentile.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the examples of differences in the BMI metrics, the longitudinal tracking results and current familiarity BMI z-scores and percentiles. Both extended BMIz and extended BMI percentiles may be suitable replacements for the current z-scores and percentiles. These metrics are identical to those in the CDC growth charts for BMIs of <95th percentile and are superior for very high BMIs. Researchers' familiarity with the current CDC z-scores and clinicians with the CDC percentiles may ease the transition to the extended BMI scale.