Centre for Brain Science, Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, CO4 3SQ, United Kingdom.
Endurance Research Group, School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Kent, Chatham Maritime, ME4 4AG, United Kingdom.
Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2021 Jul;289:103652. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2021.103652. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
This study aimed at investigating whether: 1) different sinusoidal linear drifts would affect the estimation of the dynamic parameters amplitude (A) and phase lag (φ) of minute ventilation (V˙), oxygen uptake, carbon dioxide production and heart rate (HR) sinusoidal responses when the frequency analysis technique (F) is performed; 2) the Marquardt-Levenberg non-linear fitting technique (ML) would provide more precise estimations of A and φ of drifted sinusoidal responses compared to F. For each cardiorespiratory variable, fifteen responses to sinusoidal forcing of different sinusoidal periods were simulated by using a first-order dynamic linear model. A wide range of linear drifts were subsequently applied. A and φ were computed for all drifted and non-drifted responses by using both F (A and φ) and ML (A and φ). For non-drifted responses, no differences between A vs A and φ vs φ were found. Whereas A and φ were affected by the sinusoidal linear drifts, A and φ were not. Significant interaction effects (technique x drift) were found for A (P < 0.001; ƞ > 0.247) and φ (P < 0.001; ƞ > 0.851). Higher goodness of fit values were observed when using ML for drifted V˙ and HR responses only. The present findings suggest ML as a recommended technique to use when sinusoidal linear drifts occur during sinusoidal exercise, and provide new insights on how to analyse drifted cardiorespiratory sinusoidal responses.
1)不同的正弦线性漂移是否会影响频率分析技术(F)在分析分钟通气量(V˙)、摄氧量、二氧化碳产生量和心率(HR)的正弦响应的动态参数幅度(A)和相位滞后(φ)时的估计;2)Marquardt-Levenberg 非线性拟合技术(ML)是否比 F 更能精确地估计漂移正弦响应的 A 和 φ。对于每个心肺变量,使用一阶动态线性模型模拟了十五个不同正弦周期的正弦强制响应。随后应用了广泛的线性漂移。使用 F(A 和 φ)和 ML(A 和 φ)对所有漂移和非漂移响应进行了 A 和 φ 的计算。对于非漂移响应,A 与 A 之间和 φ 与 φ 之间没有差异。而 A 和 φ 受到正弦线性漂移的影响。A 和 φ 之间存在显著的交互效应(技术 x 漂移)(P < 0.001;ƞ > 0.247)。仅在使用 ML 分析漂移的 V˙ 和 HR 响应时,观察到更好的拟合值。当正弦运动期间发生正弦线性漂移时,建议使用 ML 作为推荐技术,为分析漂移的心肺正弦响应提供了新的见解。