• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长达 4 年的时间里,接受那他珠单抗和芬戈莫德治疗的多发性硬化症患者无疾病活动(NEDA-3)状态的长期对比分析。

Long-term comparative analysis of no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) status between multiple sclerosis patients treated with natalizumab and fingolimod for up to 4 years.

机构信息

Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza G. Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.

出版信息

Neurol Sci. 2021 Nov;42(11):4647-4655. doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05127-z. Epub 2021 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1007/s10072-021-05127-z
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Comparative effectiveness of natalizumab and fingolimod over a follow-up longer than 2 years has been not addressed yet.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effect on no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients treated with natalizumab or fingolimod for at least 4 years.

METHODS

We included RRMS patients switched from first-line agents to natalizumab or fingolimod. Patients were propensity score (PS)-matched on a 1-to-1 basis. Percentages of patients reaching NEDA-3 status at 2 and 4 years of follow-up were compared using the chi-square test. The risk of not achieving NEDA-3 at 4 years was explored in matched samples by Cox regression models.

RESULTS

We evaluated 174 PS-matched patients. Patients receiving natalizumab reached a NEDA-3 status at 2 and 4 years more frequently than those exposed to fingolimod (63% vs 44%, p=0.037; 45.7% vs 25.8%, p=0.015, respectively). Patients receiving natalizumab were at a significant lower risk of not achieving the NEDA-3 status at 4 years compared to those exposed to fingolimod (hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 0.54 (0.36-0.80), p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Although both medications were effective in patients non-responding to first-line agents, natalizumab seems to be superior to fingolimod in RRMS in obtaining NEDA-3 status at 4 years.

摘要

背景

尚无研究比较那他珠单抗和芬戈利莫德在超过 2 年的随访时间内的疗效。

目的

比较至少接受那他珠单抗或芬戈利莫德治疗 4 年以上的复发缓解型多发性硬化(RRMS)患者在无疾病活动(NEDA-3)方面的疗效。

方法

我们纳入了从一线药物转换为那他珠单抗或芬戈利莫德的 RRMS 患者。对患者进行 1:1 倾向评分匹配。采用卡方检验比较两组患者在 2 年和 4 年随访时达到 NEDA-3 状态的比例。在匹配样本中,采用 Cox 回归模型探讨 4 年时未达到 NEDA-3 的风险。

结果

我们评估了 174 对匹配的患者。接受那他珠单抗治疗的患者在 2 年和 4 年时达到 NEDA-3 状态的比例明显高于接受芬戈利莫德治疗的患者(63%比 44%,p=0.037;45.7%比 25.8%,p=0.015)。与接受芬戈利莫德治疗的患者相比,接受那他珠单抗治疗的患者在 4 年时未达到 NEDA-3 状态的风险显著降低(风险比(95%置信区间):0.54(0.36-0.80),p=0.002)。

结论

尽管两种药物对一线治疗药物无应答的患者均有效,但那他珠单抗在 RRMS 患者中似乎在 4 年时获得 NEDA-3 状态方面优于芬戈利莫德。

相似文献

1
Long-term comparative analysis of no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) status between multiple sclerosis patients treated with natalizumab and fingolimod for up to 4 years.长达 4 年的时间里,接受那他珠单抗和芬戈莫德治疗的多发性硬化症患者无疾病活动(NEDA-3)状态的长期对比分析。
Neurol Sci. 2021 Nov;42(11):4647-4655. doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05127-z. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
2
Natalizumab versus fingolimod in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis non-responding to first-line injectable therapies.那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德治疗一线注射治疗应答不佳的复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的疗效比较。
Mult Scler. 2016 Sep;22(10):1315-26. doi: 10.1177/1352458516650736. Epub 2016 May 26.
3
The real-world effectiveness of natalizumab and fingolimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. An Italian multicentre study.那他珠单抗和芬戈莫德治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的真实世界疗效。一项意大利多中心研究。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Aug;33:146-152. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.05.026. Epub 2019 May 31.
4
Comparative analysis of natalizumab versus fingolimod as second-line treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.比较那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德作为复发缓解型多发性硬化二线治疗的疗效分析。
Mult Scler. 2018 May;24(6):777-785. doi: 10.1177/1352458518768433. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
5
Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of natalizumab and fingolimod in rapidly evolving severe relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the United Kingdom.在英国,对比那珠单抗和芬戈莫德治疗快速进展性重度复发缓解型多发性硬化的疗效和成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):109-125. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2293379. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
6
Effects of Natalizumab and Fingolimod on Clinical, Cognitive, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures in Multiple Sclerosis.那他珠单抗和芬戈莫德对多发性硬化症的临床、认知和磁共振成像指标的影响。
Neurotherapeutics. 2020 Jan;17(1):208-217. doi: 10.1007/s13311-019-00781-w.
7
Natalizumab Versus Fingolimod in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Subgroup Analysis From Three International Cohorts.那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者:来自三个国际队列的亚组分析。
CNS Drugs. 2021 Nov;35(11):1217-1232. doi: 10.1007/s40263-021-00860-7. Epub 2021 Sep 18.
8
The comparative effectiveness of fingolimod, natalizumab, and ocrelizumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.芬戈莫德、那他珠单抗和奥瑞珠单抗在复发缓解型多发性硬化症中的比较疗效。
Neurol Sci. 2023 Jun;44(6):2121-2129. doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-06608-z. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
9
Treatment effectiveness of alemtuzumab compared with natalizumab, fingolimod, and interferon beta in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a cohort study.在复发缓解型多发性硬化症中,与那他珠单抗、芬戈莫德和干扰素β相比,阿仑单抗的治疗效果:一项队列研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2017 Apr;16(4):271-281. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30007-8. Epub 2017 Feb 11.
10
Effectiveness of fingolimod in real-world relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis Italian patients: the GENIUS study.芬戈莫德在意大利复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者真实世界中的疗效:GENIUS研究
Neurol Sci. 2020 Oct;41(10):2843-2851. doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-04380-y. Epub 2020 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.那他珠单抗相关的进行性多灶性白质脑病
Front Neurol. 2025 Jun 20;16:1575653. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1575653. eCollection 2025.
2
NEDA-state, psychological symptoms and quality of life are stable in natalizumab-treated multiple sclerosis patients: An up to 6-years long follow-up study.那他珠单抗治疗的多发性硬化症患者的无疾病活动状态、心理症状和生活质量稳定:一项长达6年的随访研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 18;10(20):e39536. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39536. eCollection 2024 Oct 30.
3
Effects of fingolimod on focal and diffuse damage in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis - The "EVOLUTION" study.
芬戈莫德对复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者局灶性和弥漫性损伤的影响 - “EVOLUTION”研究。
J Neurol. 2024 Sep;271(9):6181-6196. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12590-z. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
4
A two-years real-word study with fingolimod: early predictors of efficacy and an association between EBNA-1 IgG titers and multiple sclerosis progression.一项为期两年的芬戈莫德真实世界研究:疗效的早期预测指标以及 EBNA-1 IgG 滴度与多发性硬化进展之间的关联。
Front Immunol. 2024 Jun 7;15:1384411. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1384411. eCollection 2024.
5
High frequency of circulating non-classical monocytes is associated with stable remission in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.循环非经典单核细胞的高频与复发性缓解型多发性硬化症的稳定缓解相关。
Immunol Med. 2024 Sep;47(3):151-165. doi: 10.1080/25785826.2024.2331271. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
6
Comparative Effectiveness of Natalizumab, Fingolimod, and Injectable Therapies in Pediatric-Onset Multiple Sclerosis: A Registry-Based Study.基于注册登记研究的比较:那他珠单抗、芬戈莫德和注射用药物在儿童发病多发性硬化症中的疗效。
Neurology. 2024 Apr 9;102(7):e208114. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000208114. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
7
Clinical predictors of NEDA-3 one year after diagnosis of pediatric multiple sclerosis: an exploratory single-center study.儿童多发性硬化症诊断后一年达到无疾病活动状态3(NEDA-3)的临床预测因素:一项探索性单中心研究
Front Neurosci. 2023 Sep 14;17:1259306. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1259306. eCollection 2023.