• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

寻找丢失的夹:标记夹引导下乳腺肿块切除术的女性患者结局。

In Search of the Lost Clip: Outcome of Women After Needle-Guided Lumpectomy of a Marking Clip.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.

The Breast Imaging Unit, Tel Aviv Soursaky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;28(9):4974-4980. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09800-7. Epub 2021 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-021-09800-7
PMID:33677760
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Needle localization of a marking clip is required to guide accurate removal of many breast lesions. When the clip is not visualized on specimen radiography, concerns regarding the completeness of cancer removal and long-term outcomes arise. Using a large cohort of women undergoing breast conservation, we examined the magnitude of the problem and the outcome of women with a missing clip.

METHODS

We conducted a case-control study including all women undergoing mammographic wire-guided localization between 2013 and 2018 with a specimen radiograph showing a missing clip. The control group included women with successful removal of the clip(s). Data included demographics, cancer and treatment characteristics, and outcome. The groups were compared in regard to margin status, repeat surgery, and recurrence rates.

RESULTS

The research group included 43 women [5% of the cohort; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.9-7.2] with a missing clip. Positive margins were comparable (7, 17% of cases; 29, 15% of 196 cases in the control group; p = 0.96). Eleven women (33%) had a residual clip visualized on post-operative mammography; in four cases, a percutaneous biopsy of the clip was successful, all with no residual tumor. There was no significant difference in re-excision rates (14% vs. 8%, p = 0.23) or in local or distant recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

In the majority of women with a missing clip, the clip is not visualized on post-operative mammography. Those with a residual clip can be managed with percutaneous biopsy as long as the lesion was removed with clear margins, with comparable outcomes as women in whom the clip is visualized on specimen radiograph.

摘要

背景

为了指导准确切除许多乳腺病变,需要对标记夹进行针定位。当标本放射照相术无法观察到夹时,会引起对癌症切除的完整性和长期结果的担忧。我们使用了一组接受保乳手术的大量女性患者,研究了该问题的严重程度以及夹缺失的女性患者的结果。

方法

我们进行了一项病例对照研究,包括所有在 2013 年至 2018 年间接受乳腺导丝定位的女性患者,其标本放射照相术显示夹缺失。对照组包括成功切除夹的女性患者。数据包括人口统计学,癌症和治疗特征以及结果。比较了两组的切缘状态,重复手术和复发率。

结果

研究组包括 43 名女性(队列的 5%;95%置信区间[CI] 3.9-7.2)夹缺失。阳性切缘相似(7 例;17%的病例;29 例;对照组 196 例中的 15%;p=0.96)。11 名女性(33%)在术后乳房 X 线照相术上可见残留夹;在 4 例中,经皮夹活检成功,均无残留肿瘤。再次切除率无显着差异(14%对 8%,p=0.23)或局部或远处复发。

结论

在大多数夹缺失的女性中,术后乳房 X 线照相术无法观察到夹。只要病变切除边缘清晰,夹残留的患者可以通过经皮活检进行管理,其结果与标本放射照相术上观察到夹的女性患者相似。

相似文献

1
In Search of the Lost Clip: Outcome of Women After Needle-Guided Lumpectomy of a Marking Clip.寻找丢失的夹:标记夹引导下乳腺肿块切除术的女性患者结局。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;28(9):4974-4980. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09800-7. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
2
Intraoperative loss of core biopsy clips: clinical implications.术中粗针活检夹丢失:临床意义
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Mar;190(3):W196-200. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2569.
3
Ultrasound-Guided Segmental Mastectomy and Excisional Biopsy Using Hydrogel-Encapsulated Clip Localization as an Alternative to Wire Localization.使用水凝胶包裹夹定位替代钢丝定位的超声引导下节段性乳房切除术和切除活检术
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(10):3284-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5325-x. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
4
High resolution intra-operative two-dimensional specimen mammography and its impact on second operation for re-excision of positive margins at final pathology after breast conservation surgery.高分辨率术中二维标本乳房 X 线摄影及其对保乳手术后最终病理切缘阳性再次切除的二次手术的影响。
Am J Surg. 2011 Oct;202(4):387-94. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.09.031.
5
Outcomes of multiple wire localization for larger breast cancers: when can mastectomy be avoided?较大乳腺癌的多钢丝定位结果:何时可避免乳房切除术?
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Sep;207(3):342-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.04.019. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
6
Radio-guided vs clip-guided localization of nonpalpable mass-like lesions of the breast from a screened population: A propensity score-matched study.筛查人群中乳腺不可触及的类肿块病变的放射性引导与夹子引导定位:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;119(7):916-924. doi: 10.1002/jso.25409. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
7
Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?术中触摸准备细胞学检查;它在再切除乳房肿块切除术中起作用吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Mar;14(3):1045-50. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9263-x. Epub 2007 Jan 6.
8
Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer.乳腺癌的肿块切除术切缘、再次切除及局部复发
Am J Surg. 2000 Feb;179(2):81-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00272-5.
9
Does intra-operative margin assessment improve margin status and re-excision rates? A population-based analysis of outcomes in breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ.术中切缘评估能否改善切缘状态及再次切除率?一项基于人群的导管原位癌保乳手术结局分析。
J Surg Oncol. 2018 Dec;118(7):1205-1211. doi: 10.1002/jso.25248. Epub 2018 Oct 7.
10
Long-Term Outcomes of Multiple-Wire Localizations for More Extensive Breast Cancer: Multiple-Wire Excision Does Not Increase Recurrence, Unplanned Imaging, or Biopsies.更广泛乳腺癌多线定位的长期结果:多线切除不会增加复发、意外成像或活检的发生率。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2020 Jun;20(3):215-219. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2019.11.006. Epub 2019 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-Invasive 3D Breast Tumor Localization: A Viable Alternative to Invasive Tumor Marking.非侵入性3D乳腺肿瘤定位:侵入性肿瘤标记的可行替代方法。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jul 17;16(14):2564. doi: 10.3390/cancers16142564.
2
Does conventional specimen radiography after neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer help to reduce the rate of second surgeries?乳腺癌新辅助化疗后常规标本放射成像是否有助于降低二次手术率?
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Feb;191(3):589-598. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06466-3. Epub 2021 Dec 8.