• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺癌新辅助化疗后常规标本放射成像是否有助于降低二次手术率?

Does conventional specimen radiography after neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer help to reduce the rate of second surgeries?

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Universitätsfrauenklinik, INF 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Feb;191(3):589-598. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06466-3. Epub 2021 Dec 8.

DOI:10.1007/s10549-021-06466-3
PMID:34878635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8831236/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This is the first study to systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative specimen radiography on margin level and its potential to reduce second surgeries in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 174 cases receiving breast conserving surgery (BCS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) of primary breast cancer. Conventional specimen radiography (CSR) was performed to assess potential margin infiltration and recommend an intraoperative re-excision of any radiologically positive margin. The histological workup of the specimen served as gold standard for the evaluation of the accuracy of CSR and the potential reduction of second surgeries by CSR-guided re-excisions.

RESULTS

1044 margins were assessed. Of 47 (4.5%) histopathological positive margins, CSR identified 9 correctly (true positive). 38 infiltrated margins were missed (false negative). This resulted in a sensitivity of 19.2%, a specificity of 89.2%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 7.7%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.9%. The rate of secondary procedures was reduced from 23 to 16 with a number needed to treat (NNT) of CSR-guided intraoperative re-excisions of 25. In the subgroup of patients with cCR, the prevalence of positive margins was 10/510 (2.0%), PPV was 1.9%, and the NNT was 85.

CONCLUSION

Positive margins after NACT are rare and CSR has only a low sensitivity to detect them. Thus, the rate of secondary surgeries cannot be significantly reduced by recommending targeted re-excisions, especially in cases with cCR. In summary, CSR after NACT is inadequate for intraoperative margin assessment but remains useful to document removal of the biopsy site clip.

摘要

目的

这是第一项系统评估新辅助化疗后保乳手术(BCS)术中标本放射摄影术在评估切缘水平方面的诊断准确性及其降低接受新辅助化疗的患者进行二次手术的可能性的研究。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 174 例接受新辅助化疗(NACT)后原发性乳腺癌保乳手术的患者。常规进行标本放射摄影术(CSR)以评估潜在的切缘浸润情况,并建议对任何放射学阳性切缘进行术中再次切除。标本的组织学检查结果作为评估 CSR 准确性和 CSR 指导下再次切除降低二次手术可能性的金标准。

结果

评估了 1044 个切缘。在 47 个(4.5%)组织学阳性切缘中,CSR 正确识别了 9 个(真阳性)。38 个浸润性切缘漏诊(假阴性)。这导致了 19.2%的敏感性、89.2%的特异性、7.7%的阳性预测值(PPV)和 95.9%的阴性预测值(NPV)。通过 CSR 指导的术中再次切除,将二次手术的比例从 23 例降低至 16 例,CSR 指导的术中再次切除的治疗需要数(NNT)为 25。在 cCR 患者亚组中,阳性切缘的患病率为 10/510(2.0%),PPV 为 1.9%,NNT 为 85。

结论

NACT 后的阳性切缘很少见,CSR 检测切缘的敏感性较低。因此,通过推荐有针对性的再次切除并不能显著降低二次手术的比例,尤其是在 cCR 的情况下。总之,NACT 后的 CSR 不能满足术中切缘评估的要求,但仍有助于记录活检部位夹的切除情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d968/8831236/97a02f15dbc6/10549_2021_6466_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d968/8831236/8f3aa2287549/10549_2021_6466_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d968/8831236/97a02f15dbc6/10549_2021_6466_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d968/8831236/8f3aa2287549/10549_2021_6466_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d968/8831236/97a02f15dbc6/10549_2021_6466_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Does conventional specimen radiography after neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer help to reduce the rate of second surgeries?乳腺癌新辅助化疗后常规标本放射成像是否有助于降低二次手术率?
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Feb;191(3):589-598. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06466-3. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
2
Conventional specimen radiography in breast-conserving therapy: a useful tool for intraoperative margin assessment after neoadjuvant therapy?保乳治疗中的常规标本放射摄影术:新辅助治疗后术中切缘评估的有用工具?
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Aug;201(1):57-66. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-06976-2. Epub 2023 Jun 11.
3
Efficacy of intraoperative specimen radiography as margin assessment tool in breast conserving surgery.术中标本放射摄影术作为保乳手术切缘评估工具的疗效。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan;179(2):425-433. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05476-6. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
4
Imaging of lumpectomy surface with large field-of-view confocal laser scanning microscopy 'Histolog® scanner' for breast margin assessment in comparison with conventional specimen radiography.大视场共聚焦激光扫描显微镜“Histolog® 扫描仪”对保乳手术切缘的成像评估与传统标本放射照相的对比。
Breast. 2023 Apr;68:194-200. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.02.010. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
5
Operative outcomes of conventional specimen radiography versus in-operating room specimen radiography in radioactive seed-localized segmental mastectomies.放射性粒子定位节段性乳房切除术中传统标本放射成像与手术室标本放射成像的手术结果比较。
Am J Surg. 2018 Jan;215(1):151-154. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.07.019. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
6
Is specimen radiography still necessary in patients with non-palpable breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery using radioactive I-125 seed localization?在接受放射性碘-125 种子定位保乳手术的触诊阴性乳腺癌患者中,标本 X 线摄影是否仍然必要?
Clin Imaging. 2021 Jan;69:311-317. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.10.004. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
7
The Effect of Intraoperative Margin Assessment During Breast Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer in a Dutch Cohort.荷兰队列研究中保乳手术时术中切缘评估对乳腺癌的影响。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2024 Jan;24(1):e31-e39. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.10.002. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
8
Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.保乳手术患者术中切缘评估的作用。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Apr;14(4):1458-71. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9236-0. Epub 2007 Jan 28.
9
Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?术中触摸准备细胞学检查;它在再切除乳房肿块切除术中起作用吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Mar;14(3):1045-50. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9263-x. Epub 2007 Jan 6.
10
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast-conserving surgery - Consequences on margin status and excision volumes: A nationwide pathology study.保乳手术中的新辅助化疗——对切缘状态和切除体积的影响:一项全国性病理学研究
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jul;42(7):986-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.02.252. Epub 2016 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Utility of photoacoustic patterns in intra-operative margin assessment of breast cancer post neoadjuvant chemotherapy.光声模式在新辅助化疗后乳腺癌术中切缘评估中的应用
Photoacoustics. 2025 Feb 23;43:100701. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2025.100701. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
The underused potential of breast conserving therapy after neoadjuvant system treatment - Causes and solutions.新辅助系统治疗后保乳治疗未充分利用的潜力-原因和解决方案。
Breast. 2023 Feb;67:110-115. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.01.008. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
3
Pathological examination of breast cancer samples before and after neoadjuvant therapy: recommendations from the Italian Group for the Study of Breast Pathology - Italian Society of Pathology (GIPaM-SIAPeC).

本文引用的文献

1
In Search of the Lost Clip: Outcome of Women After Needle-Guided Lumpectomy of a Marking Clip.寻找丢失的夹:标记夹引导下乳腺肿块切除术的女性患者结局。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;28(9):4974-4980. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09800-7. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
2
Identification of breast cancer patients with pathologic complete response in the breast after neoadjuvant systemic treatment by an intelligent vacuum-assisted biopsy.智能真空辅助活检识别新辅助全身治疗后乳腺病理完全缓解的乳腺癌患者。
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Jan;143:134-146. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.11.006. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
3
Patients should be the tipping point of individualizing breast cancer surgery: Commentary on 'Eliminating the breast cancer surgery paradigm after neoadjuvant systemic therapy: current evidence and future challenges'.
新辅助治疗前后乳腺癌样本的病理检查:意大利乳腺病理学研究组-意大利病理学会(GIPaM-SIAPeC)的建议。
Pathologica. 2022 Apr;114(2):104-110. doi: 10.32074/1591-951X-747. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
患者应成为乳腺癌手术个体化的转折点:对《新辅助全身治疗后摒弃乳腺癌手术模式:当前证据与未来挑战》的评论
Ann Oncol. 2020 Sep;31(9):1264. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.05.021. Epub 2020 May 28.
4
Nab-paclitaxel and atezolizumab for the treatment of PD-L1-positive, metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: review and future directions.纳武利尤单抗联合阿替利珠单抗治疗PD-L1阳性转移性三阴性乳腺癌:综述与未来方向
Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev. 2020;5(2):59-65. doi: 10.1080/23808993.2020.1730694. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
5
Eliminating the breast cancer surgery paradigm after neoadjuvant systemic therapy: current evidence and future challenges.新辅助全身治疗后消除乳腺癌手术模式:当前证据和未来挑战。
Ann Oncol. 2020 Jan;31(1):61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2019.10.012.
6
Efficacy of intraoperative specimen radiography as margin assessment tool in breast conserving surgery.术中标本放射摄影术作为保乳手术切缘评估工具的疗效。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan;179(2):425-433. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05476-6. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
7
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Intraoperative Margin Assessment during Breast-Conserving Surgery.数字乳腺断层摄影术在保乳手术中用于术中切缘评估。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;26(6):1720-1728. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07226-w. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
8
Does intra-operative margin assessment improve margin status and re-excision rates? A population-based analysis of outcomes in breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ.术中切缘评估能否改善切缘状态及再次切除率?一项基于人群的导管原位癌保乳手术结局分析。
J Surg Oncol. 2018 Dec;118(7):1205-1211. doi: 10.1002/jso.25248. Epub 2018 Oct 7.
9
Breast-specific factors determine cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction after breast-conserving therapy: Results from the randomized COBALT study.保乳治疗后,乳房特异性因素决定美容效果和患者满意度:随机COBALT研究结果
J Surg Oncol. 2018 Apr;117(5):1001-1008. doi: 10.1002/jso.25012. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
10
Performance characteristics of specimen radiography for margin assessment for ductal carcinoma in situ: a systematic review.乳腺导管原位癌切缘评估的标本放射学表现的性能特征:系统评价。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Dec;166(3):669-679. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4475-2. Epub 2017 Aug 22.