Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Injury. 2022 Mar;53 Suppl 1:S13-S18. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.02.071. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
Type III supracondylar fractures represent a difficult injury to treat and there is no universal consensus regarding the best treatment. The purpose of this study is to assess the incidence of complication associated with open reduction and compare open reduction vs closed reduction, in order to determine which treatment lead to better clinical and radiological outcomes. Is open reduction really associated with a higher number of iatrogenic complication and worse clinical outcomes in comparison to closed reduction?
A total of 55 patients, affected by type III supracondylar humerus fracture, were retrospectively selected and divided into two groups according to which type of treatment they received (open reduction or closed reduction). Major complications correlated with surgical procedure, such as infections, neurovascular iatrogenic lesions, elbow stiffness and painful scarring were assessed. The treatment outcomes and clinical features were compared among the two groups. A statistical analysis to find association between the type of reduction, the restored elbow anatomy and the clinical outcomes were performed. The follow-up varies between 1 year and 7 years.
No major complications occurred in our series of patients. Excellent and good outcomes were reported among all 26 patients that underwent an open reduction surgery and in 23 out of the 29 patients who received a closed reduction surgery. A higher number of patients in the open reduction group presented angles with normal values; moreover 3 out of the 6 patients with unsatisfactory outcomes presented with angles not in range, underlying the presence of a connection between the restored elbow anatomy and the clinical outcomes. There were no differences among the two groups regarding the presence of complications.
Open reduction should not be considered as a first line option of treatment in any pediatric patient with a type III supracondylar humerus fracture, but in several cases open surgery must be viewed as the choice with the best outcomes not only in presence of neurovascular lesion but also in case of irreducible fracture.
III 型肱骨髁上骨折是一种治疗困难的损伤,目前对于最佳治疗方法尚无共识。本研究旨在评估与切开复位相关的并发症发生率,并比较切开复位与闭合复位,以确定哪种治疗方法能带来更好的临床和影像学结果。与闭合复位相比,切开复位真的会导致更多的医源性并发症和更差的临床结果吗?
回顾性选择了 55 例 III 型肱骨髁上骨折患者,根据接受的治疗类型(切开复位或闭合复位)将其分为两组。评估了与手术相关的主要并发症,如感染、神经血管医源性损伤、肘部僵硬和疼痛性瘢痕。比较了两组的治疗结果和临床特征。对两种复位方式、复位后肘部解剖结构与临床结果之间的关系进行了统计学分析。随访时间为 1 年至 7 年。
本系列患者均未发生重大并发症。26 例行切开复位手术的患者和 29 例行闭合复位手术的患者中有 23 例报告结果优良。切开复位组有更多的患者的角度恢复正常;此外,6 例不满意结果中有 3 例的角度不在正常范围内,这表明恢复后的肘部解剖结构与临床结果之间存在关联。两组患者的并发症发生率无差异。
对于任何 III 型肱骨髁上骨折的儿童患者,切开复位都不应作为首选治疗方法,但在某些情况下,开放性手术不仅在存在神经血管损伤的情况下,而且在骨折无法复位的情况下,也应被视为获得最佳结果的选择。