Transtrum M Bryant, Sanchez Diego, Griffith Shauna, Godinez Brianna, Singh Vishwajeet, Klahs Kyle J, Abdelgawad Amr, Thabet Ahmed M
Department of Emergency Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, El Paso, Texas.
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
JB JS Open Access. 2024 Aug 6;9(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00011. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
Supracondylar humerus (SCH) fractures are some of the most common fractures in pediatric patients with surgery typically consisting of either open or closed reduction with internal fixation. The aim of this meta-analysis was to identify patient, injury, and administrative factors that are associated with treating pediatric SCH fractures with open techniques.
Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, PubMed and CINAHL database searches were conducted for studies from 2010 to 2023 that made direct comparisons between open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) for treating SCH fractures in the pediatric population. The search terms used were "pediatric" AND "SCH fracture" OR "distal humerus fracture." Screening, quality assessment, and data extraction were performed by 4 reviewers. After testing for heterogeneity between studies, data were aggregated using random-effects model analysis.
Forty-nine clinical studies were included in the meta-analysis. Summated, there were 94,415 patients: 11,329 treated with ORIF and 83,086 treated with CRPP. Factors that were significantly associated with greater rates of ORIF included obesity (p = 0.001), Gartland type IV fractures (p < 0.001), general neurological deficits (p = 0.019), and ulnar nerve deficits (p = 0.003). Gartland type II (p = 0.033) and medially displaced fractures (p = 0.011) were significantly associated with lower rates of ORIF. Secondary analysis showed cross-pinning constructs (p = 0.033) and longer hospital stays (p = 0.005) are more likely to be observed in patients undergoing ORIF compared with CRPP.
This meta-analysis demonstrates that factors such as obesity, fracture displacement, and concomitant nerve deficits are more likely to require ORIF as opposed to CRPP.
Therapeutic Level III.
肱骨髁上骨折(SCH)是儿科患者中最常见的骨折类型之一,手术通常包括切开复位或闭合复位内固定。本荟萃分析的目的是确定与采用切开技术治疗儿科SCH骨折相关的患者、损伤和管理因素。
按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南,对2010年至2023年期间在PubMed和CINAHL数据库中进行的研究进行检索,这些研究直接比较了切开复位内固定(ORIF)和闭合复位经皮穿针固定(CRPP)治疗儿科人群SCH骨折的效果。使用的检索词为“儿科”和“SCH骨折”或“肱骨远端骨折”。由4名评审员进行筛选、质量评估和数据提取。在对研究间的异质性进行检验后,使用随机效应模型分析汇总数据。
49项临床研究纳入了荟萃分析。总计有94415例患者:11329例接受ORIF治疗,83086例接受CRPP治疗。与更高的ORIF发生率显著相关的因素包括肥胖(p = 0.001)、Gartland IV型骨折(p < 0.001)、一般神经功能缺损(p = 0.019)和尺神经缺损(p = 0.003)。Gartland II型(p = 0.033)和内侧移位骨折(p = 0.011)与较低的ORIF发生率显著相关。二次分析显示,与CRPP相比,接受ORIF治疗的患者更有可能出现交叉穿针结构(p = 0.033)和更长的住院时间(p = 0.005)。
本荟萃分析表明,肥胖、骨折移位和伴随的神经缺损等因素与CRPP相比更有可能需要ORIF治疗。
治疗性III级。