Suppr超能文献

阿立哌唑与利培酮治疗首发精神分裂症的急性期:一项 6 周随机、灵活剂量、开放标签临床试验。

Aripiprazole vs Risperidone for the acute-phase treatment of first-episode psychosis: A 6-week randomized, flexible-dose, open-label clinical trial.

机构信息

University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla-IDIVAL, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Cantabria, Avda. Valdecilla n 25, 39008, SANTANDER, Cantabria, Santander, Spain.

University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla-IDIVAL, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Cantabria, Avda. Valdecilla n 25, 39008, SANTANDER, Cantabria, Santander, Spain; CIBERSAM, Centro Investigación Biomédica en Red Salud Mental, Madrid, Spain; Servicio de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, Hospital El Bierzo, GASBI, Servicio de Salud de Castilla y León (SACYL), Ponferrada (León), Spain.

出版信息

Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021 Jun;47:74-85. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Mar 5.

Abstract

Selecting the first antipsychotic agent for the acute phase of a first episode of psychosis (FEP) is a critical task that may impact on the long-term outcome. Despite that, there is a lack of research comparing head-to-head different second-generation antipsychotics at this stage. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of aripiprazole and risperidone in the treatment of the acute phase after a FEP. For that purpose, from February 2011 to October 2018, a prospective, randomized, open-label study was undertaken. Two hundred-sixty-six first-episode, drug-naïve patients were randomly assigned to aripiprazole (n = 136), or risperidone (n = 130) and followed-up for 6-weeks. The primary effectiveness measure was all-cause treatment discontinuation. In addition, an analysis based on intention-to-treat principle was conducted to assess clinical efficacy. The overall dropout rate at 6-week reached 19.5%. Effectiveness measures were similar between both treatment groups as treatment discontinuation rates (χ2 = 1.863; p = 0.172) and mean time until all-cause discontinuation (log rank = 1.421; p = 0.233) showed no statistically significant differences. In terms of clinical efficacy, risperidone proved a statistically significant better performance according to BPRS mean change between baseline and 6-week total score (t = 3.187; p = 0.002). Patients under risperidone treatment were significantly more likely to suffer sex-related adverse events. In conclusion, no differences regarding effectiveness were found between aripiprazole and risperidone for the acute-phase treatment of FEP. Despite the importance of efficacy during this phase of treatment, selecting the most effective treatment for the long-term outcome, requires addressing safety and patient´s preferences.

摘要

选择第一代抗精神病药物治疗首发精神分裂症(FEP)的急性期是一项关键任务,可能会影响长期预后。尽管如此,在这一阶段,仍然缺乏对头对头比较不同第二代抗精神病药物的研究。本研究旨在比较阿立哌唑和利培酮在 FEP 急性期的治疗效果。为此,从 2011 年 2 月到 2018 年 10 月,进行了一项前瞻性、随机、开放标签的研究。266 例首发、未经药物治疗的患者被随机分配到阿立哌唑(n=136)或利培酮(n=130)组,并随访 6 周。主要有效性指标为全因治疗中断。此外,还进行了基于意向治疗原则的分析,以评估临床疗效。6 周时的总辍学率为 19.5%。两组治疗的有效性指标相似,包括治疗中断率(χ2=1.863;p=0.172)和全因停药的平均时间(对数秩检验=1.421;p=0.233)均无统计学显著差异。在临床疗效方面,利培酮在 BPRS 基线至 6 周总分的平均变化方面表现出统计学上的显著优势(t=3.187;p=0.002)。利培酮治疗的患者更有可能出现与性别相关的不良事件。总之,在 FEP 的急性期治疗中,阿立哌唑和利培酮的疗效没有差异。尽管在治疗的这一阶段疗效很重要,但为了长期预后,选择最有效的治疗方法,还需要考虑安全性和患者的偏好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验