Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Eur Urol. 2021 May;79(5):665-673. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.01.003. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy as second-line treatment for metastatic clear cell renal cancer (mRCC) has not been evaluated prospectively.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab + bevacizumab following disease progression on atezolizumab or sunitinib monotherapy in patients with mRCC.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: IMmotion150 was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 study of patients with untreated mRCC. Patients randomized to the atezolizumab or sunitinib arm who had investigator-assessed progression as per RECIST 1.1 could be treated with second-line atezolizumab + bevacizumab.
Patients received atezolizumab 1200 mg intravenously (IV) plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg IV every 3 wk following disease progression on either atezolizumab or sunitinib monotherapy.
The secondary endpoints analyzed during the second-line part of IMmotion150 included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. PFS was examined using Kaplan-Meier methods.
Fifty-nine patients in the atezolizumab arm and 78 in the sunitinib arm were eligible, and 103 initiated second-line atezolizumab + bevacizumab (atezolizumab arm, n = 44; sunitinib arm, n = 59). ORR (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 27% (19-37%). The median PFS (95% CI) from the start of second line was 8.7 (5.6-13.7) mo. The median event follow-up duration was 19.4 (12.9-21.9) mo among the 25 patients without a PFS event. Eighty-six (83%) patients had treatment-related adverse events; 31 of 103 (30%) had grade 3/4 events. Limitations were the small sample size and selection for progressors.
The atezolizumab + bevacizumab combination had activity and was tolerable in patients with progression on atezolizumab or sunitinib. Further studies are needed to investigate sequencing strategies in mRCC.
Patients with advanced kidney cancer whose disease had worsened during treatment with atezolizumab or sunitinib began second-line treatment with atezolizumab + bevacizumab. Tumors shrank in more than one-quarter of patients treated with this combination, and side effects were manageable.
免疫检查点抑制剂联合血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)靶向治疗作为转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌(mRCC)的二线治疗尚未前瞻性评估。
评估阿替利珠单抗联合贝伐珠单抗在 mRCC 患者中用于治疗接受阿替利珠单抗或舒尼替尼单药治疗后疾病进展的疗效和安全性。
设计、地点和参与者:IMmotion150 是一项多中心、随机、开放标签、二期研究,纳入未经治疗的 mRCC 患者。根据 RECIST 1.1 评估,随机分配至阿替利珠单抗或舒尼替尼组的患者出现研究者评估的进展后,可接受二线阿替利珠单抗联合贝伐珠单抗治疗。
患者接受阿替利珠单抗 1200mg 静脉输注(IV)联合贝伐珠单抗 15mg/kg IV,每 3 周一次,随后是接受阿替利珠单抗或舒尼替尼单药治疗后疾病进展。
在 IMmotion150 的二线部分分析的次要终点包括客观缓解率(ORR)、无进展生存期(PFS)和安全性。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法检查 PFS。
阿替利珠单抗组 59 例和舒尼替尼组 78 例患者符合条件,103 例患者开始二线阿替利珠单抗联合贝伐珠单抗治疗(阿替利珠单抗组 n=44;舒尼替尼组 n=59)。ORR(95%置信区间[CI])为 27%(19-37%)。从二线开始的中位 PFS(95%CI)为 8.7(5.6-13.7)mo。在 25 例无 PFS 事件的患者中,中位事件随访时间为 19.4(12.9-21.9)mo。86(83%)例患者发生与治疗相关的不良事件;103 例中有 31 例(30%)发生 3/4 级事件。局限性是样本量小且选择了进展患者。
在接受阿替利珠单抗或舒尼替尼治疗后疾病进展的患者中,阿替利珠单抗联合贝伐珠单抗具有疗效且可耐受。需要进一步研究来探讨 mRCC 中的治疗顺序策略。
接受阿替利珠单抗或舒尼替尼治疗后病情恶化的晚期肾癌患者开始接受阿替利珠单抗联合贝伐珠单抗二线治疗。该联合治疗使超过四分之一的患者肿瘤缩小,且副作用可管理。