Rezaei Farzin, Hemmati Azad, Rahmani Khaled, Komasi Saeid
Neurosciences Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.
Department of Psychology, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.
Indian J Psychiatry. 2020 Sep-Oct;62(5):462-469. doi: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_345_20. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
The systematic review aims to identify four personality temperament models related to somatoform disorder with the main focus on the meta-analysis of temperaments and characters in Cloninger's theory. The literature search was performed on PubMed (Medline), Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and ProQuest for all articles published in English from January 1990 to April 2019. Due to heterogeneity, pooled estimates of the standard mean difference between cases and controls were calculated using the random-effects model. Based on our inclusion criteria, 14 studies were identified, 7 of which were included in the meta-analysis. The results show that there is a significant difference between cases and controls with regard to harm avoidance (HA) ( = 5.322, < 0.001), self-directedness ( = -4.719, < 0.001), and self-transcendence ( = 2.848, = 0.004). Compared to controls, HA and self-transcendence were higher and self-directedness was lower in cases. With regard to other subscales, there was no difference between the two groups ( > 0.05). The publication bias was not seen ( > 0.05 for Egger statistics). Up to now, very few studies have been focused on the relationship between personality temperament models and somatoform disorder. Among the components of the Cloninger's model, the poor self-directedness along with the abnormally high self-transcendence and HA is the personality component related to the somatoform disorder. Thus, Cloninger's model may potentially draw a personality profile for vulnerability to somatoform disorder. Given the limited number of studies available, future studies may challenge the results of the present study.
本系统评价旨在识别与躯体形式障碍相关的四种人格气质模型,主要侧重于对克隆宁格理论中的气质和性格进行荟萃分析。在PubMed(Medline)、Scopus、Web of Science、Cochrane和ProQuest上检索了1990年1月至2019年4月发表的所有英文文章。由于存在异质性,使用随机效应模型计算病例组和对照组之间标准均数差的合并估计值。根据纳入标准,共识别出14项研究,其中7项纳入荟萃分析。结果显示,病例组和对照组在回避伤害(HA)方面存在显著差异( = 5.322, < 0.001)、自我导向方面( = -4.719, < 0.001)以及自我超越方面( = 2.848, = 0.004)。与对照组相比,病例组的HA和自我超越得分更高,自我导向得分更低。在其他分量表方面,两组之间没有差异( > 0.05)。未发现发表偏倚(Egger检验统计量 > 0.05)。到目前为止,很少有研究关注人格气质模型与躯体形式障碍之间的关系。在克隆宁格模型的组成部分中,自我导向能力差以及自我超越和HA异常高是与躯体形式障碍相关的人格组成部分。因此,克隆宁格模型可能潜在地描绘出易患躯体形式障碍的人格特征。鉴于现有研究数量有限,未来的研究可能会对本研究结果提出挑战。