• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Construct and criterion validity of the HiTOP spectra to predict dimensional and categorical somatization in a large non-western sample.HiTOP 谱图对预测大型非西方样本多维和分类躯体化的构建和标准效度。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 14;13(1):13197. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40545-3.
2
A head-to-head comparison of eight unique personality systems in predicting somatization phenomenon.八种独特人格系统预测躯体化现象的头对头比较。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Dec 5;23(1):912. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05424-1.
3
Criterion A of the AMPD in HiTOP.HiTOP 中的 AMPD 的标准 A
J Pers Assess. 2019 Jul-Aug;101(4):345-355. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1465431. Epub 2018 May 10.
4
The distinction between symptoms and traits in the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP).精神病理学分层分类体系(HiTOP)中症状与特质的区分。
J Pers. 2022 Feb;90(1):20-33. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12593. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
5
From Structure to Process: On the Integration of AMPD and HiTOP.从结构到过程:AMPd 和 HiTOP 的整合。
J Pers Assess. 2019 Jul-Aug;101(4):360-366. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1501696. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
6
Investigating the Spectra constellations of the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) model for personality disorders based on empirical data from a community sample.基于社区样本的实证数据,调查精神病理学分层分类法(HiTOP)模型中人格障碍的谱群结构。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2019 Mar-Apr;41(2):148-152. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2018-0015. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
7
Post-traumatic disorder symptom severity in the perspective of hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology spectra and dysfunctional personality domains among trauma-exposed community-dwelling women.创伤暴露的社区居住女性中,从精神病理学谱和功能失调人格领域的层次分类角度看创伤后应激障碍症状的严重程度。
Personal Ment Health. 2022 Feb;16(1):47-58. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1525. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
8
Somatization and Somatic Symptom Disorder and its overlap with dimensionally measured personality pathology: A systematic review.躯体化与躯体症状障碍及其与维度测量人格病理学的重叠:系统综述。
J Psychosom Res. 2021 Dec;151:110646. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110646. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
9
A Transdiagnostic, Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology Following Traumatic Brain Injury (HiTOP-TBI).创伤性脑损伤后精神病理学的跨诊断分层分类法(HiTOP-TBI)
J Neurotrauma. 2025 Apr;42(7-8):714-730. doi: 10.1089/neu.2024.0006. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
10
Dimensional personality traits and the prediction of DSM-IV personality disorder symptom counts in a nonclinical sample.非临床样本中的维度人格特质与DSM-IV人格障碍症状计数的预测
J Pers Disord. 2005 Feb;19(1):53-67. doi: 10.1521/pedi.19.1.53.62180.

引用本文的文献

1
Level of personality functioning and maladaptive personality traits in relation to depression and anxiety symptoms in middle and older adults.中老年人的人格功能水平和适应不良人格特质与抑郁和焦虑症状的关系
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 2;15(1):11303. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96067-7.
2
A Meta-Analysis of the Structural Validity of Original and Brief Versions of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 in Iran.伊朗版《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版人格量表原始版与简版结构效度的Meta分析
Iran J Psychiatry. 2025 Jan;20(1):126-141. doi: 10.18502/ijps.v20i1.17406.
3
An Updated Validation of Persian Versions of Six Personality Questionnaires: TEMPS-A, AFECTS, TCI, PANAS, NEO-FFI, PDQ-4.六种人格问卷波斯语版本的更新验证:TEMPS-A、AFECTS、TCI、PANAS、NEO-FFI、PDQ-4
Indian J Psychol Med. 2024 Sep 9:02537176241276741. doi: 10.1177/02537176241276741.
4
Research on the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) in Iran: A Narrative Literature Review.伊朗人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)研究:叙事性文献综述
Indian J Psychol Med. 2024 Oct 10:02537176241281888. doi: 10.1177/02537176241281888.
5
How are poor sleepers with other clinical conditions affected by maladaptive personality traits? A neural network-based analysis.患有其他临床疾病的睡眠不佳者如何受到适应不良人格特质的影响?基于神经网络的分析。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 12;15:1392525. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1392525. eCollection 2024.
6
Meta-Analytic Review of Temperamental Correlates of the Five-Factor Model and Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology Domains.五因素模型与精神病理学领域层次分类法气质相关因素的元分析综述
Indian J Psychol Med. 2024 May;46(3):208-220. doi: 10.1177/02537176231210396. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
7
A head-to-head comparison of eight unique personality systems in predicting somatization phenomenon.八种独特人格系统预测躯体化现象的头对头比较。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Dec 5;23(1):912. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05424-1.

本文引用的文献

1
dynamic : An R Package for Deriving Dynamic Fit Index Cutoffs for Factor Analysis.Dynamic:一个用于推导因子分析动态拟合指数临界值的R包。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2023 Jan-Feb;58(1):189-194. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2022.2163476. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
2
The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) Is Not an Improvement Over the DSM.精神病理学层次分类法(HiTOP)并非对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)的改进。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2022 Mar;10(2):285-290. doi: 10.1177/21677026211068873. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
3
Somatoform's placement and validity in the hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology (HiTOP).躯体形式障碍在精神病理学层级分类(HiTOP)中的定位和有效性。
Psychiatry Res. 2022 Jul;313:114593. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114593. Epub 2022 May 2.
4
Folk Classification and Factor Rotations: Whales, Sharks, and the Problems With the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP).民间分类与因素旋转:鲸鱼、鲨鱼以及精神病理学层次分类法(HiTOP)的问题
Clin Psychol Sci. 2022 Mar;10(2):259-278. doi: 10.1177/21677026211002500. Epub 2021 May 18.
5
Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): III. Emotional dysfunction superspectrum.精神病理学层次分类法(HiTOP)的有效性和实用性:III. 情绪功能障碍超谱
World Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;21(1):26-54. doi: 10.1002/wps.20943.
6
Comprehensive meta-analysis of associations between temperament and character traits in Cloninger's psychobiological theory and mental disorders.对 Cloninger 的心理生物学理论中的气质和性格特征与精神障碍之间的关联进行综合荟萃分析。
J Int Med Res. 2022 Jan;50(1):3000605211070766. doi: 10.1177/03000605211070766.
7
The interplay of self-critical rumination and resting heart rate variability on subjective well-being and somatic symptom distress: A prospective study.自我批判式沉思与静息心率变异性对主观幸福感和躯体症状困扰的相互作用:一项前瞻性研究。
J Psychosom Res. 2021 Nov 14;152:110676. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110676.
8
Somatization and Somatic Symptom Disorder and its overlap with dimensionally measured personality pathology: A systematic review.躯体化与躯体症状障碍及其与维度测量人格病理学的重叠:系统综述。
J Psychosom Res. 2021 Dec;151:110646. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110646. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
9
HiTOP Assessment of the Somatoform Spectrum and Eating Disorders.躯体形式谱系障碍和进食障碍的HiTOP评估
Assessment. 2022 Jan;29(1):62-74. doi: 10.1177/10731911211020825. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
10
Developing Preliminary Scales for Assessing the HiTOP Detachment Spectrum.开发用于评估HiTOP分离谱的初步量表。
Assessment. 2022 Jan;29(1):75-87. doi: 10.1177/10731911211015313. Epub 2021 Jun 6.

HiTOP 谱图对预测大型非西方样本多维和分类躯体化的构建和标准效度。

Construct and criterion validity of the HiTOP spectra to predict dimensional and categorical somatization in a large non-western sample.

机构信息

Neurosciences Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.

Department of Neuroscience and Psychopathology Research, Mind GPS Institute, Kermanshah, Iran.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 14;13(1):13197. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40545-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-40545-3
PMID:37580386
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10425466/
Abstract

The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) is a phenotypic data-driven framework for the classification of psychopathology. We tested the construct and criterion validity of the HiTOP spectra measured by the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) using exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) and hierarchical regressions both to predict somatic symptom and related disorders (SSRD) and a somatization factor. The case-control study used hierarchical logistic regressions to distinguish 257 cases with SSRD from 1007 healthy controls by both the maladaptive and the temperament factors. The extracted factors were also used in hierarchical linear regressions to predict the dimensional somatization factor. The seven temperament factors explained more variance above and beyond the five maladaptive factors when predicting SSRD (pseudo R = 0.169 to 0.266 versus 0.125 to 0.196; change in pseudo R = 0.055 to 0.087 versus 0.011 to 0.017). The temperament factors also explained more variance above and beyond the maladaptive factors when predicting the somatization factor (R = 0.392 versus 0.269; change in R = 0.146 versus 0.023). Although the HiTOP spectra measured by PID-5 are significant structures related to the categorical and dimensional measurements of somatoform, our findings highlight potential problems with both the construct and criterion validity of the HiTOP spectra.

摘要

精神病理学的层次分类(HiTOP)是一种基于表型数据的精神病理学分类框架。我们使用探索性结构方程建模(ESEM)和层次回归来测试人格障碍诊断与统计手册第五版人格量表(PID-5)测量的 HiTOP 谱的构念和效标效度,以预测躯体症状及相关障碍(SSRD)和躯体化因子。病例对照研究使用分层逻辑回归来区分 257 例 SSRD 病例和 1007 例健康对照,同时区分适应不良和气质因素。提取的因子也用于分层线性回归来预测维度躯体化因子。在预测 SSRD 时,七个气质因素比五个适应不良因素解释了更多的方差(伪 R=0.169 至 0.266 与 0.125 至 0.196;伪 R 的变化=0.055 至 0.087 与 0.011 至 0.017)。在预测躯体化因子时,气质因素也比适应不良因素解释了更多的方差(R=0.392 与 0.269;R 的变化=0.146 与 0.023)。虽然 PID-5 测量的 HiTOP 谱是与躯体形式的分类和维度测量相关的显著结构,但我们的研究结果强调了 HiTOP 谱的构念和效标效度存在潜在问题。