Dennis Matthew J
Technische Universiteit Delft, Delft, Netherlands.
Ethics Inf Technol. 2021;23(3):435-445. doi: 10.1007/s10676-021-09584-0. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
The COVID-19 pandemic has catalysed what may soon become a permanent digital transition in the domains of work, education, medicine, and leisure. This transition has also precipitated a spike in concern regarding our digital well-being. Prominent lobbying groups, such as the Center for Humane Technology (CHT), have responded to this concern. In April 2020, the CHT has offered a set of 'Digital Well-Being Guidelines during the COVID-19 Pandemic.' These guidelines offer a rule-based approach to digital well-being, one which aims to mitigate the effects of moving much of our lives online. The CHT's guidelines follow much recent interest in digital well-being in the last decade. Ethicists of technology have recently argued that character-based strategies and redesigning of online architecture have the potential to promote the digital well-being of online technology users. In this article, I evaluate (1) the CHT's rule-based approach, comparing it with (2) character-based strategies and (3) approaches to redesigning online architecture. I argue that all these approaches have some merit, but that each needs to contribute to an integrated approach to digital well-being in order to surmount the challenges of a post-COVID world in which we may well spend much of our lives online.
新冠疫情推动了工作、教育、医学和休闲领域可能很快会成为永久性的数字转型。这一转型也引发了人们对数字健康的高度关注。一些知名游说团体,如人道技术中心(CHT),已对这一关注做出回应。2020年4月,CHT发布了一套“新冠疫情期间的数字健康指南”。这些指南提供了一种基于规则的数字健康方法,旨在减轻我们生活大量转移到线上所带来的影响。CHT的指南顺应了过去十年人们对数字健康的广泛关注。技术伦理学家最近认为,基于性格的策略和重新设计在线架构有可能促进在线技术用户的数字健康。在本文中,我评估了(1)CHT基于规则的方法,并将其与(2)基于性格的策略以及(3)重新设计在线架构的方法进行比较。我认为所有这些方法都有一定的优点,但每种方法都需要为数字健康的综合方法做出贡献,以便应对后新冠时代的挑战,在后新冠时代我们很可能会有大量时间在线上度过。