Department of Philosophy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Department of Philosophy, Unit for the Ethics of Technology, Center for Applied Ethics, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Mar 27;30(2):10. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00474-4.
In this paper, I introduce a "promises and perils" framework for understanding the "soft" impacts of emerging technology, and argue for a eudaimonic conception of well-being. This eudaimonic conception of well-being, however, presupposes that we have something like stable character traits. I therefore defend this view from the "situationist challenge" and show that instead of viewing this challenge as a threat to well-being, we can incorporate it into how we think about living well with technology. Human beings are susceptible to situational influences and are often unaware of the ways that their social and technological environment influence not only their ability to do well, but even their ability to know whether they are doing well. Any theory that attempts to describe what it means for us to be doing well, then, needs to take these contextual features into account and bake them into a theory of human flourishing. By paying careful attention to these contextual factors, we can design systems that promote human flourishing.
在本文中,我介绍了一个“承诺与危险”框架,用于理解新兴技术的“软性”影响,并主张采用幸福论的幸福概念。然而,这种幸福论的幸福概念预设了我们具有稳定的性格特征。因此,我从“情境主义挑战”的角度为这种观点辩护,并表明我们可以将其纳入我们思考如何与技术共同生活的方式中,而不是将其视为对幸福的威胁。人类容易受到情境的影响,而且常常没有意识到他们的社会和技术环境不仅影响他们做得好的能力,甚至影响他们知道自己是否做得好的能力。任何试图描述我们做得好意味着什么的理论都需要考虑这些语境特征,并将其融入到人类繁荣的理论中。通过仔细关注这些情境因素,我们可以设计出促进人类繁荣的系统。