• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“进行思考”的具身表现。儿童论证活动中思考展示的认知与互动功能。

Embodied Displays of "Doing Thinking." Epistemic and Interactive Functions of Thinking Displays in Children's Argumentative Activities.

作者信息

Heller Vivien

机构信息

Department of German Studies, School of Humanities and Cultural Studies, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 18;12:636671. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.636671. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.636671
PMID:33679563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7935546/
Abstract

This study investigates moments in which one participant in an interaction embodies that he is "doing thinking," a display that is commonly referred to as "thinking face. " From an interactional perspective, it is assumed that embodied displays of "doing thinking" are a recurring social practice and serve interactive functions. While previous studies have examined thinking faces primarily in word searches and storytelling, the present study focuses on argumentative activities, in which children engage in processes of joint decision-making. The paper has two interrelated aims. The first aim is to describe how multiple modalities-beyond the face-are temporally coordinated to create multimodal gestalts of "doing thinking." It is shown that thinking displays not only involve dynamic imaginative gaze but also stylized bodily postures. The second aim is to generate knowledge about the functions of thinking displays in children's argumentative activities. The analysis describes how both speakers and recipients use thinking displays in different turn positions and align them with verbal talk or silence. The data for this study comprise video recordings of decision-making processes in groups of older children. Drawing on a multimodal approach to situated interaction, it will be proposed that embodied displays of "doing thinking" provide a resource to shape participation frameworks, mark epistemic stances and create epistemic ecologies for collaborative reasoning. By investigating thinking displays in a particular conversational activity, the study sheds light on the diversity and context-sensitive functionality of thinking displays. It also contributes to recent research on children's collaborative reasoning as an embodied discursive practice.

摘要

本研究考察了互动中的一方体现出自己正在“进行思考”的时刻,这种表现通常被称为“思考脸”。从互动的角度来看,人们认为“进行思考”的身体表现是一种反复出现的社会实践,并具有互动功能。虽然先前的研究主要在单词搜索和讲故事中考察思考脸,但本研究聚焦于论证活动,即儿童参与共同决策的过程。本文有两个相互关联的目标。第一个目标是描述除面部之外的多种模态如何在时间上进行协调,以创造出“进行思考”的多模态整体。研究表明,思考表现不仅涉及动态的想象性注视,还包括程式化的身体姿势。第二个目标是生成关于思考表现在儿童论证活动中的功能的知识。分析描述了说话者和接收者如何在不同的话轮位置使用思考表现,并使其与言语交谈或沉默相协调。本研究的数据包括年龄较大儿童群体决策过程的视频记录。借鉴情境互动的多模态方法,我们将提出,“进行思考”的身体表现为塑造参与框架、标记认知立场以及为协作推理创造认知生态提供了一种资源。通过在特定对话活动中研究思考表现,该研究揭示了思考表现的多样性和情境敏感性功能。它也为近期将儿童协作推理视为一种身体话语实践的研究做出了贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e57/7935546/3438102972b9/fpsyg-12-636671-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e57/7935546/4c8b86601e6e/fpsyg-12-636671-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e57/7935546/912d0491eeb1/fpsyg-12-636671-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e57/7935546/0723ffb6f3f6/fpsyg-12-636671-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e57/7935546/0dbec9a97b6f/fpsyg-12-636671-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e57/7935546/3438102972b9/fpsyg-12-636671-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e57/7935546/4c8b86601e6e/fpsyg-12-636671-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e57/7935546/912d0491eeb1/fpsyg-12-636671-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e57/7935546/0723ffb6f3f6/fpsyg-12-636671-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e57/7935546/0dbec9a97b6f/fpsyg-12-636671-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e57/7935546/3438102972b9/fpsyg-12-636671-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Embodied Displays of "Doing Thinking." Epistemic and Interactive Functions of Thinking Displays in Children's Argumentative Activities.“进行思考”的具身表现。儿童论证活动中思考展示的认知与互动功能。
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 18;12:636671. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.636671. eCollection 2021.
2
Children as Investigators of Brunerian "Possible Worlds". The Role of Narrative Scenarios in children's Argumentative Thinking.作为布鲁纳式“可能世界”探索者的儿童。叙事场景在儿童论证性思维中的作用。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2019 Dec;53(4):679-693. doi: 10.1007/s12124-019-09505-3.
3
Deixis, Meta-Perceptive Gaze Practices, and the Interactional Achievement of Joint Attention.指示、元感知注视行为与共同注意的互动实现
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 11;11:1779. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01779. eCollection 2020.
4
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.人类为什么要推理?论证理论的论证。
Behav Brain Sci. 2011 Apr;34(2):57-74; discussion 74-111. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10000968.
5
Curious, thoughtful and affirmative-Young children's meanings of participation in healthcare situations when using an interactive communication tool.好奇、深思熟虑和肯定——幼儿使用互动交流工具时参与医疗保健情境的意义。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jan;27(1-2):235-246. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13878. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
6
Exploring Conversational and Physiological Aspects of Psychotherapy Talk.探索心理治疗谈话中的对话与生理方面
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 5;11:591124. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591124. eCollection 2020.
7
Look together: analyzing gaze coordination with epistemic network analysis.共同注视:运用认知网络分析来分析注视协调
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 21;6:1016. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01016. eCollection 2015.
8
"Be rational!" Epistemic aims and socio-cognitive tension in argumentation about dietary choices.“保持理性!” 关于饮食选择的论证中的认知目标与社会认知张力
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 11;13:933062. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.933062. eCollection 2022.
9
Children's Judgments of Epistemic and Moral Agents: From Situations to Intentions.儿童对认知和道德主体的判断:从情境到意图。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 May;14(3):344-360. doi: 10.1177/1745691618805452. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
10
Demonstrating consensus in argumentative settings: Co-constructions in children's peer discussions.在辩论情境中展现共识:儿童同伴讨论中的共同建构
Eur J Psychol Educ. 2024;39(3):1739-1757. doi: 10.1007/s10212-024-00840-7. Epub 2024 May 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Silence after narratives by patients in psychodynamic psychotherapy: a conversation analytic study.精神动力心理治疗中患者叙述后的沉默:一项会话分析研究。
Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 28;15:1397523. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1397523. eCollection 2024.
2
Displaying epistemic stance through same-turn self-repair in Chinese civil courtroom interaction.在中国民事法庭互动中通过同轮自我修正展现认知立场。
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 20;14:1285759. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1285759. eCollection 2023.
3
"Be rational!" Epistemic aims and socio-cognitive tension in argumentation about dietary choices.

本文引用的文献

1
Facial Displays Are Tools for Social Influence.面部表情是影响社交的工具。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 May;22(5):388-399. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.006. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
2
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF POSTURE IN COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS.姿势在通信系统中的重要性。
Psychiatry. 1964 Nov;27:316-31. doi: 10.1080/00332747.1964.11023403.
3
Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking.在自然口语中使用“呃”和“嗯”。
“保持理性!” 关于饮食选择的论证中的认知目标与社会认知张力
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 11;13:933062. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.933062. eCollection 2022.
4
Helping as a Concurrent Activity: How Students Engage in Small Groups While Pursuing Classroom Tasks.作为并行活动的帮助行为:学生在完成课堂任务时如何参与小组活动。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 13;12:784906. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.784906. eCollection 2021.
Cognition. 2002 May;84(1):73-111. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00017-3.
4
Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction.社交互动中目光方向的一些功能。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1967;26(1):22-63. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(67)90005-4.