O'Hagan Maria J H, Pascual-Linaza Ana V, Couzens Catherine, Holmes Clare, Bell Colin, Spence Nessie, Huey Robert J, Murphy Julie A, Devaney Ryan, Lahuerta-Marin Angela
Veterinary Epidemiology Unit, Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Surveillance and Antimicrobial Resistance Branch, Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Front Microbiol. 2021 Feb 18;12:596891. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.596891. eCollection 2021.
Antimicrobial resistant (AMR) bacteria can be shared between humans and animals, through food, water, and the environment. Wild animals are not only potential reservoirs of AMR, but are also sentinels mirroring the presence of AMR zoonotic bacteria in the environment. In Northern Ireland, little is known about levels of AMR in bacteria in wildlife, thus the current study aimed to estimate the prevalence of AMR bacteria in wildlife using wildlife species from two ongoing surveys as a proxy. Nasopharyngeal swabs and faecal samples from European badgers () (146 faecal samples; 118 nasal samples) and red foxes () (321 faecal samples; 279 nasal samples) were collected throughout Northern Ireland and were used to survey for the presence of extended spectrum beta lactamase resistant and AmpC-type beta lactamases (ESBL/AmpC), spp. (only in badgers) and methicillin resistant (MRSA). ESBLs were detected in 13 out of 146 badger faecal samples (8.90%) and 37 out of 321 of fox faecal samples (11.53%), all of them presenting multi-drug resistance (MDR). Fourteen out of 146 (9.59%) badger faecal samples carried spp. [ ( = 9), Newport ( = 4) and subsp. ( = 1)]. Overall, AMR was found only in the subsp. isolate (1/14, 7.14%). No MRSA were detected in nasopharyngeal swabs from badgers ( = 118) and foxes ( = 279). This is the first attempt to explore the prevalence of AMR in the two common wildlife species in Northern Ireland. These findings are important as they can be used as a base line for further research exploring the origin of the found resistance. These results should encourage similar surveys where environmental samples are included to bring better understanding of AMR dynamics, and the impact on wildlife, domestic livestock and humans.
抗菌药物耐药(AMR)细菌可通过食物、水和环境在人类与动物之间传播。野生动物不仅是AMR的潜在宿主,也是反映环境中AMR人畜共患病细菌存在情况的哨兵。在北爱尔兰,人们对野生动物体内细菌的AMR水平了解甚少,因此当前研究旨在以两项正在进行的调查中的野生动物物种为代表,估算野生动物中AMR细菌的流行率。在北爱尔兰各地收集了来自欧洲獾(146份粪便样本;118份鼻拭子样本)和赤狐(321份粪便样本;279份鼻拭子样本)的鼻咽拭子和粪便样本,用于检测产超广谱β-内酰胺酶和AmpC型β-内酰胺酶(ESBL/AmpC)、沙门氏菌属(仅在獾中检测)以及耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的存在情况。在146份獾粪便样本中有13份(8.90%)检测到ESBLs,在321份狐狸粪便样本中有37份(11.53%)检测到ESBLs,所有这些样本均呈现多重耐药(MDR)。146份(9.59%)獾粪便样本中有14份携带沙门氏菌属[肠炎沙门氏菌(9份)、纽波特沙门氏菌(4份)和猪霍乱沙门氏菌亚种(1份)]。总体而言,仅在猪霍乱沙门氏菌亚种分离株中发现AMR(1/14,7.14%)。在獾(n = 118)和狐狸(n = 279)的鼻咽拭子中未检测到MRSA。这是首次尝试探究北爱尔兰两种常见野生动物物种中AMR的流行情况。这些发现很重要,因为它们可作为进一步研究耐药性来源的基线。这些结果应鼓励开展类似调查,纳入环境样本,以更好地了解AMR动态以及对野生动物、家畜和人类的影响。