Vázquez-García José G, Rojano-Delgado Antonia M, Alcántara-de la Cruz Ricardo, Torra Joel, Dellaferrera Ignacio, Portugal João, De Prado Rafael
Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Edaphology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Departamento de Química, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil.
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Feb 12;12:617040. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.617040. eCollection 2021.
The levels of resistance to glyphosate of 13 barnyard grass () populations harvested across different agriculture areas in the Southern Iberian Peninsula were determined in greenhouse and laboratory experiments. Shikimate accumulation fast screening separated the populations regarding resistance to glyphosate: susceptible (S) E2, E3, E4, and E6 and resistant (R) E1, E5, E7, E8, E9, E10, E11, E12, and E13. However, resistance factor (GR E1-E13/GR E6) values separated these populations into three groups: (S) E2, E3, E4, and E6, (R) E1, E5, E7, E8, and E9, and very resistant (VR) E10, E11, E12, and E13. C-glyphosate assays performed on two S populations (E2 and E6) showed greater absorption and translocation than those found for R (E7 and E9) and VR (E10 and E12) populations. No previous population metabolized glyphosate to amino methyl phosphonic acid (AMPA) and glyoxylate, except for the E10 population that metabolized 51% to non-toxic products. The VR populations showed two times more 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) activity without herbicide than the rest, while the inhibition of the EPSPS activity by 50% (I) required much higher glyphosate in R and VR populations than in S populations. These results indicated that different target-site and non-target-site resistance mechanisms were implicated in the resistance to glyphosate in . Our results conclude that resistance is independent of climate, type of crop, and geographic region and that the level of glyphosate resistance was mainly due to the selection pressure made by the herbicide on the different populations of studied.
在温室和实验室实验中,测定了从伊比利亚半岛南部不同农业区采集的13个稗草种群对草甘膦的抗性水平。莽草酸积累快速筛选将种群分为对草甘膦敏感(S)的E2、E3、E4和E6种群以及抗性(R)的E1、E5、E7、E8、E9、E10、E11、E12和E13种群。然而,抗性因子(GR E1 - E13/GR E6)值将这些种群分为三组:(S)E2、E3、E4和E6,(R)E1、E5、E7、E8和E9,以及高抗(VR)E10、E11、E12和E13。对两个敏感种群(E2和E6)进行的C - 草甘膦测定显示,其吸收和转运能力高于抗性(E7和E9)和高抗(E10和E12)种群。除E10种群将51%的草甘膦代谢为无毒产物外,之前没有种群将草甘膦代谢为氨基甲基膦酸(AMPA)和乙醛酸。高抗种群在无除草剂情况下的5 - 烯醇丙酮酸莽草酸 - 3 - 磷酸合酶(EPSPS)活性比其他种群高出两倍,而使EPSPS活性抑制50%(I)所需的草甘膦浓度,抗性和高抗种群比敏感种群高得多。这些结果表明,不同靶标位点和非靶标位点抗性机制均与稗草对草甘膦的抗性有关。我们的结果表明,抗性与气候、作物类型和地理区域无关,草甘膦抗性水平主要归因于除草剂对所研究的不同稗草种群的选择压力。