Tepedino Michele, Iancu Potrubacz Maciej, Imperiale Antonella, Chimenti Claudio, Capogreco Mario, D'Amario Maurizio
Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Int J Dent. 2021 Feb 17;2021:6649578. doi: 10.1155/2021/6649578. eCollection 2021.
The aim of the present study was to in vitro evaluate the effect of dentin conditioning with hydroabrasion on the microtensile bond strengths of three adhesive systems, compared to the standard etch-and-rinse technique. Sixty extracted human third molars were collected, and their midcoronal occlusal dentin was used for the microtensile bond strength test. Teeth were randomly assigned to three groups according to the adhesive system used: ExciTE F DSC, ENA Bond, and Scotchbond Universal. Specimens from each group were further divided into four subgroups: control specimens were treated with standard adhesive procedures; hydroabraded (HA) specimens were subjected to preventive hydroabrasion with three different intensity levels. After bonding procedures, composite crowns were incrementally built up. After thermocycling, specimens were subsequently sectioned into 1 × 1 mm sticks, and microtensile bond strengths were measured. Data were statistically analyzed. Failure mode analysis was performed. There were no significant differences in terms of bond strength between standard adhesion protocols and adhesion with HA preconditionings. On the other hand, the type of adhesive used had a significant effect on the tensile bond strength. Subgroups treated with hydroabrasion at higher intensity showed a slightly increased frequency of cohesive fractures. In conclusion, hydroabrasion can be used for dentin cavity preparation or finishing, since it does not seem to affect the bonding effectiveness.
本研究的目的是在体外评估与标准酸蚀冲洗技术相比,使用水激光预备牙本质对三种粘接系统微拉伸粘接强度的影响。收集了60颗拔除的人类第三磨牙,其牙冠中部的咬合面牙本质用于微拉伸粘接强度测试。根据所使用的粘接系统,将牙齿随机分为三组:ExciTE F DSC、ENA Bond和Scotchbond Universal。每组标本进一步分为四个亚组:对照组采用标准粘接程序处理;水激光预备(HA)标本采用三种不同强度水平进行预防性水激光预备。粘接程序完成后,逐层堆塑复合树脂全冠。热循环后,将标本切成1×1mm的小条,测量微拉伸粘接强度。对数据进行统计学分析,并进行失效模式分析。标准粘接方案与HA预处理后的粘接强度之间没有显著差异。另一方面,所使用的粘接剂类型对拉伸粘接强度有显著影响。高强度水激光预备处理的亚组显示内聚性断裂的频率略有增加。总之,水激光预备可用于牙本质窝洞预备或修整,因为它似乎不会影响粘接效果。