• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氧化铝喷砂预处理牙本质对粘结修复体的影响。一项体外研究。

Influence of Dentine Pre-Treatment by Sandblasting with Aluminum Oxide in Adhesive Restorations. An In Vitro Study.

作者信息

Sinjari Bruna, Santilli Manlio, D'Addazio Gianmaria, Rexhepi Imena, Gigante Alessia, Caputi Sergio, Traini Tonino

机构信息

Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.

Electron Microscopy Laboratory, University G. d'Annunzio Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2020 Jul 7;13(13):3026. doi: 10.3390/ma13133026.

DOI:10.3390/ma13133026
PMID:32645819
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7372407/
Abstract

Dentine pretreatment through sandblasting procedures has been widely studied but no curve test results are currently available. Thus, the aim herein was to in vitro compare the adhesive strength in sandblasted or not samples using a universal testing machine. Thirty -two bovine teeth were divided into two groups, namely test ( = 16 bars), sandblasting with aluminum oxide particles (50 µm) was performed before the adhesion procedures), and control ( = 16 bars), where no sandblasting procedure was performed. A bi-material curve test was used to evaluate the characteristics of the dentine pretreatment in terms of tensile stress and fracture strength. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to analyze the fracture topography in the composite, bonding, dentin, and at the relative interfaces. The results demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of tensile stress at maximum load showing values of 84.300 ± 51.342 MPa and 35.071 ± 16.609 MPa, respectively for test and control groups ( = 0.033). Moreover, a fracture strength test showed values of 18.543 ± 8.145 MPa for test and 8.186 ± 2.833 MPa for control group ( = 0.008). In conclusion, the sandblasting treatment of the dentine significantly influenced the mechanical resistance of the adhesion in this in vitro study.

摘要

通过喷砂程序进行牙本质预处理已得到广泛研究,但目前尚无弯曲试验结果。因此,本研究的目的是使用万能试验机在体外比较喷砂或未喷砂样本的粘结强度。将32颗牛牙分为两组,即试验组(n = 16),在粘结程序前用氧化铝颗粒(50 µm)进行喷砂处理,以及对照组(n = 16),未进行喷砂处理。采用双材料弯曲试验来评估牙本质预处理在拉伸应力和断裂强度方面的特性。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析复合材料、粘结剂、牙本质及其相对界面处的断裂形貌。结果表明,两组在最大载荷下的拉伸应力方面存在统计学显著差异,试验组和对照组的值分别为84.300±51.342 MPa和35.071±16.609 MPa(p = 0.033)。此外,断裂强度试验显示试验组的值为18.543±8.145 MPa,对照组为8.186±2.833 MPa(p = 0.008)。总之,在本体外研究中,牙本质的喷砂处理显著影响了粘结的机械抗力。

相似文献

1
Influence of Dentine Pre-Treatment by Sandblasting with Aluminum Oxide in Adhesive Restorations. An In Vitro Study.氧化铝喷砂预处理牙本质对粘结修复体的影响。一项体外研究。
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jul 7;13(13):3026. doi: 10.3390/ma13133026.
2
Effect of three surface treatments on the adhesive properties of indirect composite restorations.三种表面处理对间接复合树脂修复体粘结性能的影响。
J Adhes Dent. 2007 Jun;9(3):319-26.
3
Do Different Pretreatments of Dentine Surface Affect the Bond Strength with a Self-adhesive Resin Cement?牙本质表面的不同预处理是否会影响与自粘结树脂水门汀的粘结强度?
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2020 Apr 3;18(2):145-152. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a43355.
4
Effects of different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite on dentine adhesion and the recovery application of sodium erythorbate.不同浓度次氯酸钠对牙本质粘结的影响及赤藻糖酸钠的回收应用。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Feb 28;47(2):226-237. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.200994.
5
The Effect of Clinical Sandblasting With Different Powders on the Surface Roughness of Cores for Metal-Ceramic Crowns and Their Fracture Resistance After the Addition of Repair Material: An In-Vitro Study.不同粉末临床喷砂处理对金属烤瓷冠核表面粗糙度及其添加修复材料后抗折强度的影响:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2022 Dec 27;14(12):e33012. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33012. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Tensile bond strength of different adhesive systems between bone and composite compared: an in vitro study.不同粘接系统在骨与复合材料之间的拉伸粘接强度比较:一项体外研究。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2004 Apr;32(2):85-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2003.11.001.
7
Sandblasting increases the microtensile bond strength between resin and sclerotic dentin in noncarious cervical lesions.喷砂处理能提高非龋性牙颈部缺损中树脂与牙本质的微拉伸粘结强度。
Am J Dent. 2024 Jun;37(3):121-125.
8
Effects of dentine surface cleaning on bonding of a self-etch adhesive to root canal sealer-contaminated dentine.牙本质表面清洁对自酸蚀黏结剂与玷污根管封闭剂的牙本质黏结效果的影响。
J Dent. 2021 Sep;112:103766. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103766. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
9
Shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets to zirconium crowns treated by sandblasting compared to enamel using a universal adhesive: An in vitro study.喷砂处理的氧化锆全瓷冠与牙釉质相比,采用通用粘结剂对金属正畸托槽的粘结强度:一项体外研究。
Int Orthod. 2022 Jun;20(2):100640. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100640. Epub 2022 May 30.
10
Micro-tensile bond strength to bovine sclerotic dentine: influence of surface treatment.对牛硬化牙本质的微拉伸粘结强度:表面处理的影响。
J Dent. 2008 Nov;36(11):922-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.07.009. Epub 2008 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Bonding to Demineralized Dentin: Impact of Immediate and Delayed Dentin Sealing over Time.与脱矿牙本质的粘结:即时和延迟牙本质封闭随时间的影响。
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Aug 5;13(8):354. doi: 10.3390/dj13080354.
2
The effect of sandblasting distances on the shear bond strength of a self-etch and total-etch adhesive system to cervical dentin in the gingival wall of Class II restorations.喷砂距离对II类修复体龈壁处自酸蚀和全酸蚀粘结系统与颈部牙本质之间剪切粘结强度的影响。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2025 Jul 24;22:30. doi: 10.4103/drj.drj_398_24. eCollection 2025.
3
Air Particle Abrasion in Dentistry: An Overview of Effects on Dentin Adhesion and Bond Strength.

本文引用的文献

1
Fracture Resistance of Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramic Crowns Cemented with Conventional or Adhesive Systems: An In Vitro Study.用传统或粘结系统粘结的氧化锆增强硅酸锂陶瓷冠的抗折性:一项体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2020 Apr 25;13(9):2012. doi: 10.3390/ma13092012.
2
Penetration of Different Impression Materials into Exposed Dentinal Tubules during the Impression Procedure.印模过程中不同印模材料渗入暴露牙本质小管的情况。
Materials (Basel). 2020 Mar 14;13(6):1321. doi: 10.3390/ma13061321.
3
Avoidance of Interaction between Impression Materials and Tooth Surface Treated for Immediate Dentin Sealing: An In Vitro Study.
牙科中的空气颗粒磨损:对牙本质黏附及粘结强度影响的概述
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Dec 29;13(1):16. doi: 10.3390/dj13010016.
4
Accuracy of laser fluorescence in assessment of various caries removal techniques: an in vitro validation.激光荧光在评估各种龋病去除技术中的准确性:一项体外验证研究
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 21;24(1):1529. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05323-1.
5
Fracture strength and marginal and internal adaptation of lithium disilicate and hybrid ceramic endocrowns and non-retentive overlays for endodontically treated molar teeth.牙髓治疗后磨牙的二硅酸锂和混合陶瓷内冠及非固位覆盖体的断裂强度、边缘及内部适应性
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 20;24(1):1524. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05327-x.
6
Tests of Dental Properties of Composite Materials Containing Nanohybrid Filler.含纳米混合填料的复合材料的牙科性能测试
Materials (Basel). 2022 Dec 30;16(1):348. doi: 10.3390/ma16010348.
7
Resin Cement Residue Removal Techniques: In Vitro Analysis of Marginal Defects and Discoloration Intensity Using Micro-CT and Stereomicroscopy.树脂水门汀残留去除技术:使用微型计算机断层扫描和体视显微镜对边缘缺损和变色强度的体外分析
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Apr 1;10(4):55. doi: 10.3390/dj10040055.
8
Water-Airborne-Particle Abrasion as a Pre-Treatment to Improve Bioadhesion and Bond Strength of Glass-Ceramic Restorations: From In Vitro Study to 15-Year Survival Rate.水基空气颗粒磨损作为一种预处理方法以提高玻璃陶瓷修复体的生物粘附性和粘结强度:从体外研究到15年生存率
Materials (Basel). 2021 Aug 31;14(17):4966. doi: 10.3390/ma14174966.
9
Micro-CT and Microscopy Study of Internal and Marginal Gap to Tooth Surface of Crenelated versus Conventional Dental Indirect Veneers.微 CT 和显微镜研究牙面内边缘间隙的牙釉质牙骨质界与常规牙间接贴面。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jul 29;57(8):772. doi: 10.3390/medicina57080772.
10
Carbon Nanotubes for Improved Performances of Endodontic Sealer.用于改善根管封闭剂性能的碳纳米管
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jul 29;14(15):4248. doi: 10.3390/ma14154248.
避免印模材料与经即刻牙本质封闭处理的牙面之间的相互作用:一项体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2019 Oct 22;12(20):3454. doi: 10.3390/ma12203454.
4
A 10-year retrospective comparative human study on screw-retained versus cemented dental implant abutments.10 年回顾性比较研究:螺钉固位与粘结固位牙科种植体基台的临床效果。
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2019 May-Jun;33(3):787-797.
5
Modifying Adhesive Materials to Improve the Longevity of Resinous Restorations.改性黏接材料以提高树脂修复体的寿命。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Feb 8;20(3):723. doi: 10.3390/ijms20030723.
6
Adhesion of resin cement to dentin: effects of adhesive promoters, immediate dentin sealing strategies, and surface conditioning.树脂水门汀与牙本质的黏附:黏附促进剂、即时牙本质封闭策略及表面处理的影响
Int J Esthet Dent. 2019;14(1):52-63.
7
A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic single crowns.氧化锆陶瓷-陶瓷和金属-陶瓷单冠的存活率和并发症发生率的系统评价。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:199-214. doi: 10.1111/clr.13306.
8
Properties of Experimental Dental Composites Containing Antibacterial Silver-Releasing Filler.含抗菌性银释放填料的实验性牙科复合材料的性能
Materials (Basel). 2018 Jun 18;11(6):1031. doi: 10.3390/ma11061031.
9
Effect of smear layer deproteinization on bonding of self-etch adhesives to dentin: a systematic review and meta-analysis.玷污层脱蛋白处理对自酸蚀黏结剂与牙本质黏结的影响:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Restor Dent Endod. 2018 Mar 6;43(2):e14. doi: 10.5395/rde.2018.43.e14. eCollection 2018 May.
10
Influence of dentin and enamel on the fracture resistance of restorations at several thicknesses.牙本质和牙釉质对不同厚度修复体抗折性的影响。
Am J Dent. 2018 Feb;31(1):34-38.