• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SIMARD-MD并非用于确定驾驶适宜性的有效驾驶筛查工具。

The SIMARD-MD is not an Effective Driver Screening Tool for Determining Fitness-To-Drive.

作者信息

Crizzle Alexander M, Mullen Nadia, Mychael Diane, Meger Natasha, Toxopeus Ryan, Gibbons Carrie, Ostap Simeon, Dubois Sacha, Bédard Michel

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Can Geriatr J. 2021 Mar 2;24(1):14-21. doi: 10.5770/cgj.24.444. eCollection 2021 Mar.

DOI:10.5770/cgj.24.444
PMID:33680259
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7904326/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies have reported poor sensitivity and specificity of the Screen for the Identification of Cognitively Impaired Medically At-Risk Drivers, a modification of the DemTech (SIMARD-MD) to screen for drivers with cognitive impairment. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the SIMARD-MD can accurately predict pass/fail on a road test in drivers with cognitive impairment (CI) and healthy drivers.

METHODS

Data from drivers with CI were collected from two comprehensive driving assessment centres (n=86) and compared with healthy drivers (n=30). All participants completed demographic measures, clinical measures, and a road rest (pass/fail). Analyses consisted of correlations between the SIMARD-MD and the other clinical measures, and a receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve to determine the predictive ability of the SIMARD-MD.

RESULTS

All healthy drivers passed the road test compared with 44.2% of the CI sample. On the SIMARD-MD, the CI sample scored significantly worse than healthy drivers ( < .001). The ROC curve showed the SIMARD-MD, regardless of any cut-point, misclassified a large number of CI individuals (AUC=.692; 95% CI = 0.578, 0.806).

CONCLUSIONS

Given the high level of misclassification, the SIMARD-MD should not be used with either healthy drivers or those with cognitive impairment for making decisions about driving.

摘要

背景

研究报告称,用于识别有医学风险的认知障碍驾驶员的筛查工具(SIMARD-MD,DemTech的一种改良版)在筛查认知障碍驾驶员方面的敏感性和特异性较差。本研究的目的是确定SIMARD-MD能否准确预测认知障碍(CI)驾驶员和健康驾驶员在路考中的通过/失败情况。

方法

从两个综合驾驶评估中心收集了CI驾驶员的数据(n = 86),并与健康驾驶员(n = 30)进行比较。所有参与者都完成了人口统计学测量、临床测量和路考(通过/失败)。分析包括SIMARD-MD与其他临床测量之间的相关性,以及用于确定SIMARD-MD预测能力的受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线。

结果

所有健康驾驶员都通过了路考,而CI样本中只有44.2%通过。在SIMARD-MD测试中,CI样本的得分明显低于健康驾驶员(P <.001)。ROC曲线显示,无论设定何种临界点,SIMARD-MD都会将大量CI个体误分类(AUC = 0.692;95%CI = 0.578, 0.806)。

结论

鉴于误分类水平较高,SIMARD-MD不应被用于健康驾驶员或认知障碍驾驶员的驾驶决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8d3/7904326/c63eaed40720/cgj-24-14f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8d3/7904326/c63eaed40720/cgj-24-14f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8d3/7904326/c63eaed40720/cgj-24-14f1.jpg

相似文献

1
The SIMARD-MD is not an Effective Driver Screening Tool for Determining Fitness-To-Drive.SIMARD-MD并非用于确定驾驶适宜性的有效驾驶筛查工具。
Can Geriatr J. 2021 Mar 2;24(1):14-21. doi: 10.5770/cgj.24.444. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
It is premature to test older drivers with the SIMARD-MD.用 SIMARD-MD 测试老年驾驶员为时尚早。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Dec;61:317-21. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.001. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
3
The Introduction of a New Screening Tool for the Identification of Cognitively Impaired Medically At-Risk Drivers: The SIMARD A Modification of the DemTect.一种用于识别存在医疗风险的认知障碍驾驶员的新型筛查工具的介绍:SIMARD(对DemTect的一种改进)
J Prim Care Community Health. 2010 Jul 1;1(2):119-27. doi: 10.1177/2150131910369156.
4
Comparison of the SIMARD MD to Clinical Impression in Assessing Fitness to Drive in Patients with Cognitive Impairment.在评估认知障碍患者的驾驶适宜性时,SIMARD MD与临床印象的比较。
Can Geriatr J. 2014 Jun 3;17(2):63-9. doi: 10.5770/cgj.17.100. eCollection 2014 Jun.
5
Using Serial Trichotomization to Determine Fitness to Drive in Medically At-Risk Drivers.使用连续三分法来确定医学高危驾驶员的驾驶能力。
Am J Occup Ther. 2024 Jan 1;78(1). doi: 10.5014/ajot.2024.050134.
6
How effective is the Trail Making Test (Parts A and B) in identifying cognitively impaired drivers?简易精神状态检查表(A 和 B 部分)在识别认知障碍驾驶员方面的效果如何?
Age Ageing. 2013 Sep;42(5):577-81. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft073. Epub 2013 Jul 28.
7
Driving Errors Predicting Pass/Fail On-Road Assessment Outcomes Among Cognitively Impaired Older Drivers.认知障碍老年驾驶员驾驶失误预测路考通过/失败结果。
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2023 Jan;43(1):144-153. doi: 10.1177/15394492221076494. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
8
Performance Analysis of Driving Ability (P-Drive): Investigating Construct Validity and Concordance of Australasian Data.驾驶能力表现分析(P-Drive):澳大利亚数据的构念效度与一致性研究。
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2025 Jan;45(1):95-104. doi: 10.1177/15394492231221960. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
9
The SIMARD Screening Tool to Identify Unfit Drivers: Are We There Now?用于识别不适合驾车者的西马尔德筛查工具:我们现在做到了吗?
J Prim Care Community Health. 2011 Apr;2(2):133-5. doi: 10.1177/2150131910397704.
10
Can a novel web-based computer test predict poor simulated driving performance? a pilot study with healthy and cognitive-impaired participants.一种新型的基于网络的计算机测试能否预测模拟驾驶表现不佳?一项针对健康参与者和认知障碍参与者的试点研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Oct 21;15(10):e232. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2943.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between car driving and successful ageing. A cross sectional study on the "S.AGES" cohort.驾驶汽车与成功老龄化的关联。对“S.AGES”队列的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2023 May 4;18(5):e0285313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285313. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Update on the Risk of Motor Vehicle Collision or Driving Impairment with Dementia: A Collaborative International Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.关于痴呆症与机动车碰撞或驾驶障碍风险的更新:一项合作性国际系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 Dec;25(12):1376-1390. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 15.
2
Prediction of Fitness to Drive in Patients with Alzheimer's Dementia.阿尔茨海默病痴呆患者驾驶适宜性的预测
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 24;11(2):e0149566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149566. eCollection 2016.
3
Predicting On-Road Driving Performance and Safety in Cognitively Impaired Older Adults.
预测认知障碍老年人的道路驾驶性能与安全性
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Nov;63(11):2365-9. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13712. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
4
Driving Errors in Persons with Dementia.痴呆患者的驾驶错误。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Jul;63(7):1373-80. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13508. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
5
Comparison of the SIMARD MD to Clinical Impression in Assessing Fitness to Drive in Patients with Cognitive Impairment.在评估认知障碍患者的驾驶适宜性时,SIMARD MD与临床印象的比较。
Can Geriatr J. 2014 Jun 3;17(2):63-9. doi: 10.5770/cgj.17.100. eCollection 2014 Jun.
6
The SIMARD Screening Tool to Identify Unfit Drivers: Are We There Now?用于识别不适合驾车者的西马尔德筛查工具:我们现在做到了吗?
J Prim Care Community Health. 2011 Apr;2(2):133-5. doi: 10.1177/2150131910397704.
7
The Introduction of a New Screening Tool for the Identification of Cognitively Impaired Medically At-Risk Drivers: The SIMARD A Modification of the DemTect.一种用于识别存在医疗风险的认知障碍驾驶员的新型筛查工具的介绍:SIMARD(对DemTect的一种改进)
J Prim Care Community Health. 2010 Jul 1;1(2):119-27. doi: 10.1177/2150131910369156.
8
It is premature to test older drivers with the SIMARD-MD.用 SIMARD-MD 测试老年驾驶员为时尚早。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Dec;61:317-21. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.001. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
9
Papers that might change your practice: review of the introduction of a new screening tool for the identification of cognitively impaired medically at-risk drivers.可能改变您临床实践的论文:一种用于识别有医学风险的认知受损驾驶员的新型筛查工具的引入综述。
Can Geriatr J. 2011 Jun;14(2):51-4. doi: 10.5770/cgj.v14i2.12. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
10
Road test and naturalistic driving performance in healthy and cognitively impaired older adults: does environment matter?健康认知正常老年人和认知障碍老年人的道路测试和自然驾驶性能:环境重要吗?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Nov;60(11):2056-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04206.x. Epub 2012 Oct 30.