Suppr超能文献

驾驶能力表现分析(P-Drive):澳大利亚数据的构念效度与一致性研究。

Performance Analysis of Driving Ability (P-Drive): Investigating Construct Validity and Concordance of Australasian Data.

机构信息

The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.

Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2025 Jan;45(1):95-104. doi: 10.1177/15394492231221960. Epub 2024 Jan 25.

Abstract

On-road assessment is optimal for determining medical fitness-to-drive but unreliable if determined by global pass/fail decisions alone. Occupational therapists need standardized, psychometrically sound on-road scoring procedures. Performance Analysis of Driving Ability (P-Drive) is a promising on-road test developed in Sweden, but it has not been standardized for Australasia. We investigated the psychometric properties and concordance with an on-road decision of data gathered with the Australasian version of P-Drive. P-Drive was administered to older and cognitively impaired drivers ( = 134) aged 18 to 91 years (mean age 68) who were referred to 10 driving clinics in Australia and New Zealand to determine driving performance. Rasch analysis provided evidence for construct validity and concordance of the data gathered. An optimal cut-off score of 85 was set, yielding evidence of good sensitivity at 88% and specificity at 88%. The Australasian version of P-Drive produces valid and reliable data regarding on-road driving performance.

摘要

路考是确定驾驶适能的最佳方法,但仅通过全球通过/失败的决定来确定则不可靠。职业治疗师需要标准化的、心理测量学上可靠的路考评分程序。驾驶能力绩效分析(P-Drive)是在瑞典开发的一种很有前途的路考测试,但尚未在澳大拉西亚标准化。我们研究了与澳大利亚版 P-Drive 的路考决定相关的数据的心理测量特性和一致性。P-Drive 对 18 至 91 岁(平均年龄 68 岁)的老年和认知受损驾驶员( = 134)进行了评估,这些驾驶员被转诊到澳大利亚和新西兰的 10 个驾驶诊所,以确定驾驶性能。Rasch 分析为收集到的数据的结构有效性和一致性提供了证据。设定了 85 分的最佳截断分数,敏感性为 88%,特异性为 88%。澳大利亚版 P-Drive 可提供有关路考驾驶性能的有效且可靠的数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a446/11571594/004c68e7b112/10.1177_15394492231221960-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Performance Analysis of Driving Ability (P-Drive): Investigating Construct Validity and Concordance of Australasian Data.
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2025 Jan;45(1):95-104. doi: 10.1177/15394492231221960. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
2
Predicting Fitness to Drive for Medically At-Risk Drivers Using Touchscreen DriveSafe DriveAware.
Am J Occup Ther. 2023 Jan 1;77(1). doi: 10.5014/ajot.2023.050048.
3
Development of a standardised Occupational Therapy--Driver Off-Road Assessment Battery to assess older and/or functionally impaired drivers.
Aust Occup Ther J. 2012 Feb;59(1):23-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2011.00979.x. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
4
Validation of Brief Screening Tools to Identify Impaired Driving Among Older Adults in Australia.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e208263. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8263.
5
Visual attention outperforms visual-perceptual parameters required by law as an indicator of on-road driving performance.
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 14;15(8):e0236147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236147. eCollection 2020.
6
Aiding medical professionals in fitness-to-drive screenings for elderly drivers: development of an office-based screening tool.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 Aug;30(8):1211-1225. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217002678. Epub 2017 Dec 10.
8
Predicting fitness-to-drive following stroke using the Occupational Therapy - Driver Off Road Assessment Battery.
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Jul;41(15):1797-1802. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1445784. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
9
Vision screening of older drivers for preventing road traffic injuries and fatalities.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 21;2014(2):CD006252. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006252.pub4.
10
Psychometrics of the Fitness-to-Drive Screening Measure.
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2015 Jan;35(1):42-52. doi: 10.1177/1539449214561761.

本文引用的文献

1
The revision of competency standards for occupational therapy driver assessors in Australia: A mixed methods approach.
Aust Occup Ther J. 2021 Jun;68(3):257-271. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12722. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
2
Standardized on-road tests assessing fitness-to-drive in people with cognitive impairments: A systematic review.
PLoS One. 2020 May 18;15(5):e0233125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233125. eCollection 2020.
3
Reliability and validity of on-road driving tests in vulnerable adults: a systematic review.
Int J Rehabil Res. 2019 Dec;42(4):289-299. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000374.
4
The MMSE should not be the sole indicator of fitness to drive in mild Alzheimer's dementia.
Acta Neurol Belg. 2018 Dec;118(4):637-642. doi: 10.1007/s13760-018-1036-3. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
6
Rasch Analysis for Instrument Development: Why, When, and How?
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Winter;15(4). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-04-0148.
7
Development and Validity of Western University's On-Road Assessment.
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2017 Jan;37(1):14-29. doi: 10.1177/1539449216672859. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
8
Driving Errors in Persons with Dementia.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Jul;63(7):1373-80. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13508. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
9
Interrater Reliability of the Record of Driving Errors (RODE).
Am J Occup Ther. 2015 Mar-Apr;69(2):6902350020p1-6. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2015.013128.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验